BACKGROUND: Recent studies revealed that colorectal tumors are composed of genetically diverse subclones. We aimed to clarify whether the surface microstructures of colorectal tumors are associated with genetic intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH). METHODS: The surface microstructures (pit patterns) of colorectal tumors were observed using magnifying endoscopy, and biopsy specimens were obtained from respective areas when tumors exhibited multiple pit patterns. A total of 711 specimens from 477 colorectal tumors were analyzed for BRAF, KRAS and TP53 mutations using pyrosequencing and direct sequencing. A panel of cancer-related genes was analyzed through targeted sequencing in 7 tumors. RESULTS: Colorectal tumors with multiple pit patterns exhibited more advanced pit patterns and higher frequencies of KRAS and/or TP53 mutations than tumors with a single pit pattern. In tumors with multiple pit patterns, mutations were observed as public (common to all areas) or private (specific to certain areas), and private KRAS and/or TP53 mutations were often variable and unrelated to the pit pattern grade. Notably, invasive CRCs frequently exhibited public TP53 mutations, even in adenomatous areas, which is indicative of their early malignant potential. Targeted sequencing revealed additional public and private mutations in tumors with multiple pit patterns, indicating their single clonal origin. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest intratumoral pit pattern variation does not simply reflect the process of colorectal tumor evolution, but instead represents genetically diverse subclones, and this diversity may be associated with malignant potential.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies revealed that colorectal tumors are composed of genetically diverse subclones. We aimed to clarify whether the surface microstructures of colorectal tumors are associated with genetic intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH). METHODS: The surface microstructures (pit patterns) of colorectal tumors were observed using magnifying endoscopy, and biopsy specimens were obtained from respective areas when tumors exhibited multiple pit patterns. A total of 711 specimens from 477 colorectal tumors were analyzed for BRAF, KRAS and TP53 mutations using pyrosequencing and direct sequencing. A panel of cancer-related genes was analyzed through targeted sequencing in 7 tumors. RESULTS:Colorectal tumors with multiple pit patterns exhibited more advanced pit patterns and higher frequencies of KRAS and/or TP53 mutations than tumors with a single pit pattern. In tumors with multiple pit patterns, mutations were observed as public (common to all areas) or private (specific to certain areas), and private KRAS and/or TP53 mutations were often variable and unrelated to the pit pattern grade. Notably, invasive CRCs frequently exhibited public TP53 mutations, even in adenomatous areas, which is indicative of their early malignant potential. Targeted sequencing revealed additional public and private mutations in tumors with multiple pit patterns, indicating their single clonal origin. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest intratumoral pit pattern variation does not simply reflect the process of colorectal tumor evolution, but instead represents genetically diverse subclones, and this diversity may be associated with malignant potential.
Authors: M R Novelli; J A Williamson; I P Tomlinson; G Elia; S V Hodgson; I C Talbot; W F Bodmer; N A Wright Journal: Science Date: 1996-05-24 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Haeyoun Kang; Matthew P Salomon; Andrea Sottoriva; Junsong Zhao; Morgan Toy; Michael F Press; Christina Curtis; Paul Marjoram; Kimberly Siegmund; Darryl Shibata Journal: J Pathol Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Gillian Smith; Francis A Carey; Julie Beattie; Murray J V Wilkie; Tracy J Lightfoot; Jonathan Coxhead; R Colin Garner; Robert J C Steele; C Roland Wolf Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-07-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephan E Baldus; Karl-L Schaefer; Rainer Engers; Dinah Hartleb; Nikolas H Stoecklein; Helmut E Gabbert Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-01-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marco Gerlinger; Andrew J Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Gronroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Charles Swanton; M Math; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron C Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P Andrew Futreal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrea Sottoriva; Haeyoun Kang; Zhicheng Ma; Trevor A Graham; Matthew P Salomon; Junsong Zhao; Paul Marjoram; Kimberly Siegmund; Michael F Press; Darryl Shibata; Christina Curtis Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Chelsie K Sievers; Luli S Zou; Perry J Pickhardt; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Dawn M Albrecht; Linda Clipson; Jeffery W Bacher; B Dustin Pooler; Fouad J Moawad; Brooks D Cash; Mark Reichelderfer; Tien N Vo; Michael A Newton; Bret R Larget; Richard B Halberg Journal: Gut Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 23.059