Literature DB >> 29948155

The mechanical leg response to vibration stimuli in cave crickets and implications for vibrosensory organ functions.

Nataša Stritih Peljhan1, Johannes Strauß2.   

Abstract

We investigate the influence of leg mechanics on the vibration input and function of vibrosensitive organs in the legs of the cave cricket Troglophilus neglectus, using laser Doppler vibrometry. By varying leg attachment, leg flexion, and body posture, we identify important influences on the amplitude and frequency parameters of transmitted vibrations. The legs respond best to relatively high-frequency vibration (200-2000 Hz), but in strong dependence on the leg position; the response peak shifts progressively over 500-1400 Hz towards higher frequencies following leg flexion. The response is amplified most strongly on the tibia, where specialised vibrosensory organs occur, and the response amplitude increases with the increasing frequency. Leg responses peaking at 800 and 1400 Hz closely resemble the tuning of the intermediate organ receptors in the proximal tibia of T. neglectus, which may be highly sensitive to positional change. The legs of free-standing animals with the abdomen touching the vibrating substrate show a secondary response peak below 150 Hz, induced by body vibration. Such responses may significantly increase the sensitivity of low-frequency receptors in the tibial accessory organ and the femoral chordotonal organ. The cave cricket legs appear suitable especially for detection of high-frequency vibration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biotremology; Mechanoreception; Sensory evolution; Vibration reception; Vibration transmission

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29948155     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-018-1271-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  26 in total

1.  How many mechanosensory organs in the bushcricket leg? Neuroanatomy of the scolopidial accessory organ in Tettigoniidae (Insecta: Orthoptera).

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Anja S Riesterer; Reinhard Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  Arthropod Struct Dev       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Structure and sensory physiology of the leg scolopidial organs in Mantophasmatodea and their role in vibrational communication.

Authors:  M J B Eberhard; D Lang; B Metscher; G Pass; M D Picker; H Wolf
Journal:  Arthropod Struct Dev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.010

3.  Vibrational sensitivity of the subgenual organ complex in female Sipyloidea sipylus stick insects in different experimental paradigms of stimulus direction, leg attachment, and ablation of a connective tibial sense organ.

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Reinhard Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.320

4.  Sensory neuroanatomy of stick insects highlights the evolutionary diversity of the orthopteroid subgenual organ complex.

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Reinhard Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Vibratory interneurons in the non-hearing cave cricket indicate evolutionary origin of sound processing elements in Ensifera.

Authors:  Natasa Stritih; Andreas Stumpner
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The vibrational startle response of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria.

Authors:  T Friedel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Transmission of vibration across honeycombs and its detection by bee leg receptors

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  The subgenual organ complex in the cave cricket Troglophilus neglectus (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae): comparative innervation and sensory evolution.

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Nataša Stritih; Reinhard Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Micro- and nano-structural details of a spider's filter for substrate vibrations: relevance for low-frequency signal transmission.

Authors:  Maxim Erko; Osnat Younes-Metzler; Alexander Rack; Paul Zaslansky; Seth L Young; Garrett Milliron; Marius Chyasnavichyus; Friedrich G Barth; Peter Fratzl; Vladimir Tsukruk; Igor Zlotnikov; Yael Politi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  An analytical model for the propagation of bending waves on a plant stem due to vibration of an attached insect.

Authors:  R N Miles
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2016-03-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Central processing of leg proprioception in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sweta Agrawal; Evyn S Dickinson; Anne Sustar; Pralaksha Gurung; David Shepherd; James W Truman; John C Tuthill
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Drosophila females receive male substrate-borne signals through specific leg neurons during courtship.

Authors:  Eleanor G Z McKelvey; James P Gyles; Kyle Michie; Violeta Barquín Pancorbo; Louisa Sober; Laura E Kruszewski; Alice Chan; Caroline C G Fabre
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 10.900

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.