Literature DB >> 29947730

Sex Differences in the Association between Heavy Drinking and Behavioral Distress Tolerance and Emotional Reactivity Among Non-Depressed College Students.

Paola Pedrelli1,2, Laura MacPherson3, Amanda J Khan4, Benjamin G Shapero1,2, Lauren B Fisher1,2, Maren Nyer1,2, Paolo Cassano1,2, Lindsey Parnarouskis1, Amy Farabaugh1,2, Maurizio Fava1,2, Marisa M Silveri2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heavy episodic drinking (HED) is a common behavior among college students that is associated with severe negative consequences. Negative reinforcement processes have been applied to elucidate mechanisms underlying relationships between consumption of alcohol and the desire to alleviate negative feelings. Distress tolerance (DT) and emotional reactivity are two mechanisms that are consistent with the self-medication model that may contribute to HED. The current study investigated relationships between DT, emotional reactivity, defined as frustration reactivity and irritability reactivity, and HED in a non-depressed college population. Given differential patterns of consumption and motivation for drinking between males and females, sex differences were also examined. SHORT
SUMMARY: The study examined two constructs consistent with negative reinforcement processes, behavioral distress tolerance (DT) and emotional reactivity (frustration reactivity and irritability reactivity), to explain heavy episodic drinking (HED) among non-depressed college students. Behavioral DT and frustration reactivity independently predicted HED. Higher HED was associated with higher frustration reactivity and lower behavioral DT in women, but nor in men.
METHODS: One-hundred-ten college students without depressive symptoms completed alcohol use measures and the Paced Auditory Serial Attention Task (PASAT-C) to assess behavioral DT and emotional reactivity.
RESULTS: DT and frustration reactivity independently predicted HED. The association between DT and HED was moderated by sex such that higher levels of DT predicted higher HED among females, but not among males. Higher frustration reactivity scores were associated with a greater number of HED.
CONCLUSIONS: Results provide supporting evidence that DT and emotional reactivity are distinct factors, and that they predict HED independently. Results underscore the importance of examining sex differences when evaluating the association between HED and negative reinforcement processes in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29947730      PMCID: PMC6454502          DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agy045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol        ISSN: 0735-0414            Impact factor:   2.826


  46 in total

1.  Distress tolerance and duration of past smoking cessation attempts.

Authors:  Richard A Brown; C W Lejuez; Christopher W Kahler; David R Strong
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2002-02

2.  The short-term effects and unintended long-term consequences of binge drinking in college: a 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Karen M Jennison
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.829

3.  Distress tolerance as a predictor of early treatment dropout in a residential substance abuse treatment facility.

Authors:  Stacey B Daughters; C W Lejuez; Marina A Bornovalova; Christopher W Kahler; David R Strong; Richard A Brown
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2005-11

4.  Alcohol use, urinary cortisol, and heart rate variability in apparently healthy men: Evidence for impaired inhibitory control of the HPA axis in heavy drinkers.

Authors:  Julian F Thayer; Martica Hall; John J Sollers; Joachim E Fischer
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Problematic alcohol and cannabis use among young adults: the roles of depression and discomfort and distress tolerance.

Authors:  Julia D Buckner; Meghan E Keough; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Cold pressor task reactivity: predictors of alcohol use among alcohol-dependent individuals with and without comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Kathleen T Brady; Sudie E Back; Angela E Waldrop; Aimee L McRae; Raymond F Anton; Himanshu P Upadhyaya; Michael E Saladin; Patrick K Randall
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Stress reactivity: biological and subjective responses to the cold pressor and Trier Social stressors.

Authors:  Aimee L McRae; Michael E Saladin; Kathleen T Brady; Himanshu Upadhyaya; Sudie E Back; Mary Ann Timmerman
Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.672

8.  Life stress, physiological and subjective indexes of negative emotionality, and coping reasons for drinking: is there evidence for a self-medication model of alcohol use?

Authors:  C R Colder
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2001-09

9.  Gender differences in stress reactivity among cocaine-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Sudie E Back; Kathleen T Brady; Joan L Jackson; Seoka Salstrom; Heidi Zinzow
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Is gender relevant only for problem alcohol behaviors? An examination of correlates of alcohol use among college students.

Authors:  Zaje A T Harrell; Nidal M Karim
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A biological framework for emotional dysregulation in alcohol misuse: from gut to brain.

Authors:  Carina Carbia; Séverine Lannoy; Pierre Maurage; Eduardo López-Caneda; Kenneth J O'Riordan; Timothy G Dinan; John F Cryan
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 15.992

2.  Large-scale brain network activation during emotional inhibitory control: Associations with alcohol misuse in college freshmen.

Authors:  Julia E Cohen-Gilbert; Lisa D Nickerson; Anna M Seraikas; Emily N Oot; Maya M Rieselbach; Eleanor M Schuttenberg; Jennifer T Sneider; Marisa M Silveri
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.455

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.