Literature DB >> 29947009

Thulium (Tm:YAG) laser vaporesection of prostate and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yu Lan1,2, Wenqi Wu1, Luhao Liu1, Shiyu Zhou3,4, Chuangxin Lan1, Irene Raphael Ketegwe1, Guohua Zeng5.   

Abstract

Thulium laser vaporesection (ThuVARP) and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) are novel surgeries for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). This paper is a systematic review and analysis of literatures comparing efficacy indicators, operative parameters, as well as safety indicators between ThuVARP and B-TURP for the treatment of BPH. A systematic search of electronic databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), was carried out up to December 1, 2015 (updated on March 1, 2016). The captivating outcomes included basic clinical characteristics, perioperative parameters, local complications, and efficacy indicators which included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum flow rate (Qmax), and postvoid residual (PVR). After assessing the quality of methodology and extracting data, a meta-analysis was carried out by using STATA 12.0 software. Five studies involving 500 patients met the standard. The outcomes of this analysis were as follows: (a) efficacy indicators: there were no significant differences in IPSS, QoL, PVR, and Qmax between the two groups (all P > 0.05); (b) perioperative indicators: ThuVARP had longer operative time [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.843; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.391, 1.296; P < 0.001] but less serum hemoglobin decreased (SMD = - 0.561; 95% CI - 0.796, - 0.327; P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD = - 1.558; 95% CI - 2.709, - 0.407; P < 0.01), and catheterization time (SMD = - 1.274; 95% CI - 2.158, - 0.390; P < 0.01). Additionally, no significant difference was found in estimated resected weight (P > 0.05); (c) safety indicators: no significant difference was found in local complication rates (all P > 0.05) between ThuVARP and B-TURP. In our analysis, there exists no statistical difference between ThuVARP and B-TURP group in efficacy. However, in spite of requiring longer surgical time, ThuVARP was better in terms of less blood loss as well as shorter hospitalization and catheterization time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B-TURP; BPH; Efficacy; Perioperative indicators; Safety; ThuVARP

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29947009     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-018-2539-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  18 in total

1.  Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Marco de Sio; Riccardo Autorino; Giuseppe Quarto; Rocco Damiano; Sisto Perdonà; Giuseppe di Lorenzo; Salvatore Mordente; Massimo D'Armiento
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Dogu Teber; Rainer Kuntz; Rainer Hofmann
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Thulium:YAG vapoenucleation in large volume prostates.

Authors:  Thorsten Bach; Christopher Netsch; Laura Pohlmann; Thomas R W Herrmann; Andreas J Gross
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  High prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy in the community.

Authors:  W M Garraway; G N Collins; R J Lee
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction.

Authors:  Christian Gratzke; Alexander Bachmann; Aurelien Descazeaud; Marcus J Drake; Stephan Madersbacher; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Matthias Oelke; Kari A O Tikkinen; Stavros Gravas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  A comparative study of thulium laser resection of the prostate and bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Bo Peng; Guang-chun Wang; Jun-hua Zheng; Sheng-qiang Xia; Jiang Geng; Jian-ping Che; Yang Yan; Jian-hua Huang; Yun-fei Xu; Bin Yang
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Endoscopic vaporesection of the prostate using the continuous-wave 2-microm thulium laser: outcome and demonstration of the surgical technique.

Authors:  Roman Szlauer; Robert Götschl; Aria Razmaria; Ljiljana Paras; Nikolaus T Schmeller
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Comparison between thulium laser resection of prostate and transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate or transurethral resection of prostate.

Authors:  Hong DeCao; Jia Wang; Yu Huang; Ren LiangLiu; Hao JunLei; Liang Gao; Zhuang Tang; Chun YingHu; Xiang Li; Hong JiuYuan; Qiang Dong; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  An Analytical Comparison of Short-term Effectiveness and Safety Between Thulium:YAG Laser Vaporesection of the Prostate and Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Joon Woo Kim; Yeon Joo Kim; Yoon Hyung Lee; Joon Beom Kwon; Sung Ryong Cho; Jae Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-01-15

10.  Different lasers in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xingming Zhang; Pengfei Shen; Qiying He; Xiaoxue Yin; Zhibin Chen; Haojun Gui; Kunpeng Shu; Qidun Tang; Yaojing Yang; Xiuyi Pan; Jia Wang; Ni Chen; Hao Zeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  How I Handle Retreatment of LUTS Following a Failed MIST.

Authors:  Alexis E Te; Ahra Cho; Bilal I Chughtai
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Thulium laser transurethral vaporesection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate for men with lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention (UNBLOCS): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hashim Hashim; Jo Worthington; Paul Abrams; Grace Young; Hilary Taylor; Sian M Noble; Sara T Brookes; Nikki Cotterill; Tobias Page; K Satchi Swami; J Athene Lane
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Comparison of Multipulse Laser Vaporesection versus Plasmakinetic Resection for Treatment of Benign Prostate Obstruction.

Authors:  Fu-Shun Hsu; Chen-Wei Chou; Hong-Chiang Chang; Yuan-Po Tu; Shing-Jia Sha; Huang-Hsin Chung; Kuo-How Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Retrospective analysis of the changes in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia during an 11-year period: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Zhu-Feng Peng; Jing Zhou; Pan Song; Lu-Chen Yang; Bo Yang; Zheng-Ju Ren; Lin-Chun Wang; Qiang Wei; Qiang Dong
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.