Literature DB >> 29946953

The Cost of Complications Following Major Resection of Malignant Neoplasia.

Cheryl K Zogg1,2, Taylor D Ottesen3, Kareem J Kebaish3, Anoop Galivanche3, Shilpa Murthy4,5, Navin R Changoor4, Donald L Zogg6, Timothy M Pawlik7, Adil H Haider4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rising healthcare costs have led to increased focus on the need to achieve a higher "value of care." As value-maximization efforts expand to include more complex surgical patients, evidence to support meaningful implementation of complication-based initiatives is lacking. The objective of this study was to compare incremental costs of complications following major gastrointestinal (GI) resections for organ-specific malignant neoplasia using nationally representative data.
METHODS: National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample data, 2001-2014, were queried for adult (≥ 18 years) patients undergoing major resections for malignant neoplasia. Based on system-based complications considered relevant to the long-term treatment of GI disease, stratified differences in risk-adjusted incremental hospital costs and complication probabilities were compared. Differences in surgical outcomes and costs over time were also assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 293,967 patients were included, weighted to represent 1,408,117 patients nationwide. One fourth (26.1%; 95% CI, 25.7-26.4%) experienced ≥ 1 pre-discharge complication (range, 45.3% esophagectomy to 24.0% rectal resection). Resultant annual risk-adjusted incremental hospital costs totaled $540 million nationwide (19.5% of the overall cost of care and an average of $20,900 per patient). Costs varied substantially with both cancer/resection type and complication group, ranging from $76.7 million for colectomies with infectious complications to $0.2 million for rectal resections with urinary complications. For each resection type, infectious ($154.7 million), GI ($85.5 million), and pulmonary ($77.9 million) complications were among the most significant drivers of increased hospital cost.
CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying and comparing the impact of complications on an indication-specific level in more complex patients offers an important step toward allowing providers/payers to meaningfully prioritize the design of novel and adaptation of existing value-maximization approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Complication; Cost; Infection; Oncology; Quality; Value

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29946953      PMCID: PMC6224301          DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3850-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  31 in total

1.  Are Bundled Payments a Viable Reimbursement Model for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Authors:  P Maxwell Courtney; Blair S Ashley; Eric L Hume; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Changes in Hospital Quality Associated with Hospital Value-Based Purchasing.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Sam Krinsky; Kristin A Maurer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Defining payments associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Faiz Gani; Marcelo Cerullo; Joseph K Canner; Alison Conca-Cheng; Alan E Harzman; Syed G Husain; William C Cirocco; Mark W Arnold; Amber Traugott; Fabian M Johnston; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Including physicians in bundled hospital care payments: time to revisit an old idea?

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Peter Hussey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; William B Weeks; Raj J Karia; Smita Das; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Access to Quaternary Care Surgery: Implications for Accountable Care Organizations.

Authors:  J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Matthew G Mullen; Max O Meneveau; Bruce Schirmer; Irving L Kron; R Scott Jones; Peter T Hallowell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Does pay-for-performance improve surgical outcomes? An evaluation of phase 2 of the Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration.

Authors:  Terry Shih; Lauren H Nicholas; Jyothi R Thumma; John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program in Surgery May Disproportionately Affect Minority-serving Hospitals.

Authors:  Terry Shih; Andrew M Ryan; Andrew A Gonzalez; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Surgery and Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations.

Authors:  Scott R Hawken; Andrew M Ryan; David C Miller
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Complications, Not Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique, Are Associated with Increased Cost after Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Sue J Fu; Vanessa P Ho; Jennifer Ginsberg; Yaron Perry; Conor P Delaney; Philip A Linden; Christopher W Towe
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2016-12-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk reduction in kidney surgery.

Authors:  Martin Marszalek
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

2.  COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF THE USE OF ACERTO PROTOCOL IN MAJOR DIGESTIVE SURGERY.

Authors:  José Eduardo de Aguilar-Nascimento; Alberto Bicudo-Salomão; Mara Regina Rosa Ribeiro; Diana Borges Dock-Nascimento; Cervantes Caporossi
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-06-24

Review 3.  Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project.

Authors:  Mauro Podda; Patricia Sylla; Gianluca Baiocchi; Michel Adamina; Vanni Agnoletti; Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Alberto Arezzo; Nicola Avenia; Walter Biffl; Antonio Biondi; Simona Bui; Fabio C Campanile; Paolo Carcoforo; Claudia Commisso; Antonio Crucitti; Nicola De'Angelis; Gian Luigi De'Angelis; Massimo De Filippo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Giorgio Ercolani; Gustavo P Fraga; Francesco Gabrielli; Federica Gaiani; Mario Guerrieri; Angelo Guttadauro; Yoram Kluger; Ari K Leppaniemi; Andrea Loffredo; Tiziana Meschi; Ernest E Moore; Monica Ortenzi; Francesco Pata; Dario Parini; Adolfo Pisanu; Gilberto Poggioli; Andrea Polistena; Alessandro Puzziello; Fabio Rondelli; Massimo Sartelli; Neil Smart; Michael E Sugrue; Patricia Tejedor; Marco Vacante; Federico Coccolini; Justin Davies; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Financial burden of postoperative complications following colonic resection: A systematic review.

Authors:  Maleck Louis; Samuel A Johnston; Leonid Churilov; Ronald Ma; Christopher Christophi; Laurence Weinberg
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.