Frank-Peter Tillmann1, Lars Christian Rump2, Ivo Quack2. 1. Klinik für Nephrologie, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. frank.tillmann@uni-duesseldorf.de. 2. Klinik für Nephrologie, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pre-diabetes, a risk factor for post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), represents an early therapeutic target for prevention of PTDM. We evaluated glucose metabolism post-transplantation and the ability to predict pre-diabetes and PTDM from haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels at 90 days, at 1 year, and at 3 years in long-term post-transplantation follow-up. METHODS: HbA1c levels were measured in 71 non-diabetic deceased-donor transplant recipients at four time points (during transplantation, 90-days post-transplantation, 1-year post-transplantion, and at the final post-transplantation follow-up visit 2.71 ± 1.26 years after transplantation). The predictive power of HbA1c levels at 90 days post-transplantation was determined by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rates, and false-negative rates. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for pre-diabetes and PTDM at 1-year post-transplantation and at the last follow-up visit (2.71 ± 1.26 years after renal transplantation). RESULTS: HbA1c values ≥ 5.7% were seen in 79% of patients at 90 days post-transplant, in 83% at 1 year, and in 69% of patients on follow-up. HbA1c cut-off levels of < 5.7% or ≥ 5.7% showed the highest predictive sensitivity for pathological HbA1c levels (≥ 5.7%) at 1 year post-transplantation (0.83) and at last follow-up (0.86), whereas cut-off levels of < 6.2% or .≥ 6.2% showed the highest specificity (0.97 and 1.00, respectively). The HbA1c level at 90 days was a risk factor for disturbed glucose-metabolism at 1 year (p = 0.000) and at the final follow-up (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: HbA1c levels at 90 days post-transplantation are predictive of disturbed glucose metabolism at 1 year and on long-term follow-up and may serve as predictive tools for early therapeutic interventions to prevent PTDM.
PURPOSE: Pre-diabetes, a risk factor for post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), represents an early therapeutic target for prevention of PTDM. We evaluated glucose metabolism post-transplantation and the ability to predict pre-diabetes and PTDM from haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels at 90 days, at 1 year, and at 3 years in long-term post-transplantation follow-up. METHODS: HbA1c levels were measured in 71 non-diabetic deceased-donor transplant recipients at four time points (during transplantation, 90-days post-transplantation, 1-year post-transplantion, and at the final post-transplantation follow-up visit 2.71 ± 1.26 years after transplantation). The predictive power of HbA1c levels at 90 days post-transplantation was determined by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rates, and false-negative rates. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for pre-diabetes and PTDM at 1-year post-transplantation and at the last follow-up visit (2.71 ± 1.26 years after renal transplantation). RESULTS: HbA1c values ≥ 5.7% were seen in 79% of patients at 90 days post-transplant, in 83% at 1 year, and in 69% of patients on follow-up. HbA1c cut-off levels of < 5.7% or ≥ 5.7% showed the highest predictive sensitivity for pathological HbA1c levels (≥ 5.7%) at 1 year post-transplantation (0.83) and at last follow-up (0.86), whereas cut-off levels of < 6.2% or .≥ 6.2% showed the highest specificity (0.97 and 1.00, respectively). The HbA1c level at 90 days was a risk factor for disturbed glucose-metabolism at 1 year (p = 0.000) and at the final follow-up (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: HbA1c levels at 90 days post-transplantation are predictive of disturbed glucose metabolism at 1 year and on long-term follow-up and may serve as predictive tools for early therapeutic interventions to prevent PTDM.
Authors: Fernando G Cosio; Yogish Kudva; Marije van der Velde; Timothy S Larson; Stephen C Textor; Matthew D Griffin; Mark D Stegall Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Tone G Valderhaug; Trond Jenssen; Anders Hartmann; Karsten Midtvedt; Hallvard Holdaas; Anna V Reisaeter; Jøran Hjelmesaeth Journal: Transplantation Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: V K Tutone; P B Mark; V Revanur; J Traynor; L J Buist; C C Geddes; D Deardon; A G Jardine Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Esteban L Porrini; Jose M Díaz; Francisco Moreso; Patricia I Delgado Mallén; Irene Silva Torres; Meritxell Ibernon; Beatriz Bayés-Genís; Rocío Benitez-Ruiz; Ildefonso Lampreabe; Ricardo Lauzurrica; Jose M Osorio; Antonio Osuna; Rosa Domínguez-Rollán; Juan C Ruiz; Alejandro Jiménez-Sosa; Ana González-Rinne; Domingo Marrero-Miranda; Manuel Macía; Javier García; Armando Torres Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Martina Guthoff; Dorothea Vosseler; Julia Langanke; Silvio Nadalin; Alfred Königsrainer; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Andreas Fritsche; Nils Heyne Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Débora Dias de Lucena; João Roberto de Sá; José O Medina-Pestana; Érika Bevilaqua Rangel Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 4.011