Literature DB >> 29945994

Clonal Structures of Regionally Synchronous Gastric Adenomas and Carcinomas.

Seung-Hyun Jung1,2, Shin Young Kim2,3, Chang Hyeok An3, Sung Hak Lee4, Eun Sun Jung4, Hyeon-Chun Park2, Min Sung Kim1,5, Yeun-Jun Chung6,2,7, Sug Hyung Lee6,5.   

Abstract

Purpose: Gastric adenoma (GA) is a premalignant lesion that precedes intestinal-type gastric carcinoma (GC). However, genetic progression mechanisms from GA to GC have not been clarified.Experimental Design: We performed whole-exome sequencing-based mutational analyses for 15 synchronous pairs of attached GAs and GCs.
Results: There was no significant difference in the number of driver mutations or copy-number alterations between GAs and GCs. Well-known mutations of TP53, APC, RNF43, and RPL22 were recurrently detected in synchronous GA/GC pairs. In addition, we discovered novel KDM6A, PREX2, FAT1, KMT2C, GLI3, and RPL22 mutations and hypermutation in GAs, but did not identify recurrent drivers for GA-to-GC progression. Clonal structure analyses revealed that most GA/GC pairs exhibit parallel evolution with early divergence rather than stepwise evolution during GA-to-GC progression. Of note, three cases were identified as clonally nonrelated GA/GC pairs despite the lack of histologic differences. We found differences in dominant mutational signatures 1, 6, 15, and 17 in GA/GC trunks, GA branches, and GC branches. Compared with our previous work on synchronous colon adenoma/carcinoma genome structures, where most drivers were in the trunk with parallel evolution, synchronous GA/GC genomes showed a different model of parallel evolution, with many drivers in the branches.Conclusions: The preferred sequence of mutational events during GA-to-GC progression might be more context-dependent than colon adenoma progression. Our results show that nonclonal synchronous GA/GC is common and that GA genomes have already acquired distinct genomic alterations, suggesting caution in the diagnosis of synchronous GA and GC, especially in residual or recurrent cases. Clin Cancer Res; 24(19); 4715-25. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29945994     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  3 in total

1.  Mutation Analysis of Colorectal and Gastric Carcinomas Originating from Adenomas: Insights into Genomic Evolution Associated with Malignant Progression.

Authors:  Sung Hak Lee; Jinseon Yoo; Young Soo Song; Chul-Hyun Lim; Tae-Min Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Differences in Somatic Mutation Profiles between Korean Gastric Cancer and Gastric Adenoma Patients.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Taekyu Lee; Hae Jung Sul; Ki Cheol Park; Joonhong Park
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  The role of histone methylation in the development of digestive cancers: a potential direction for cancer management.

Authors:  Yuan Chen; Bo Ren; Jinshou Yang; Huanyu Wang; Gang Yang; Ruiyuan Xu; Lei You; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-08-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.