Literature DB >> 29945913

High Burden of 30-Day Readmissions After Acute Venous Thromboembolism in the United States.

Eric A Secemsky1,2,3, Kenneth Rosenfield1,2, Kevin F Kennedy4, Michael Jaff1,2,5, Robert W Yeh6,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third leading cause of vascular disease and accounts for $10 billion in annual US healthcare costs. The nationwide burden of 30-day readmissions after such events has not been comprehensively assessed. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analyzed adults ≥18 years of age with hospitalizations associated with acute VTE between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014, in the Nationwide Readmissions Database. International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify hospitalizations associated with acute pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. The primary outcome was the rate of unplanned 30-day readmission. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to calculate hospital-specific 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates, a marker of healthcare quality. Among 1 176 335 hospitalizations with acute VTE, in-hospital death occurred in 6.2%. VTE was associated with malignancy in 19.7%, recent surgery in 19.3%, recent trauma in 4.6%, hypercoagulability in 3.3%, and pregnancy in 1.0%. Among survivors to discharge, the 30-day readmission rate was 17.5%, with no significant difference in rates across study years (17.4%-17.7%; P=0.10 for trend). Major predictors of readmission were malignancy (relative risk, 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.47-1.50), Medicaid insurance (relative risk, 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.46-1.50), and nonelective index admission (relative risk, 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.29-1.33). Top causes of readmission included sepsis (9.6%) and procedural complications (8.1%). Median rehospitalization costs were $9781.7 (interquartile range, $5430.7-$18 784.1), and 8.1% died during readmission. The interquartile range in risk-standardized readmission rates was 16.6% to 18.3%, suggesting modest interhospital heterogeneity in readmission risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 1 in 5 patients with acute VTE were readmitted within 30 days. Predictors and causes of readmission were primarily related to patient characteristics and complications from comorbid conditions, whereas healthcare quality had a moderate impact on readmission risk.
© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; readmission; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29945913      PMCID: PMC6064903          DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc        ISSN: 2047-9980            Impact factor:   5.501


Clinical Perspective

What Is New?

Nearly 1 in 5 patients with acute venous thromboembolism in the United States are readmitted within 30 days. These readmissions are associated with high healthcare costs and mortality. Predictors and causes of readmission were primarily associated with patient characteristics and complications related to comorbid conditions, whereas a smaller proportion of readmissions were associated with recurrent venous thromboembolism or disease processes directly consequential to acute venous thromboembolism. After standardizing for hospital case mix, there was only modest heterogeneity in readmission rates between institutions, suggesting that healthcare quality had only a moderate impact on readmission risk.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

Further research is needed to identify and validate effective interventions to reduce these frequent and costly readmissions that follow acute venous thromboembolism events. Because variations between risk‐standardized readmission rates among studied institutions were only modest, programs designed to penalize institutional outliers, similar to the mandate of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, may have less of an impact on improving outcomes for this disease process.

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), consisting of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), constitutes a major global health issue. With nearly 10 million annual cases worldwide and an individual lifetime risk of >8%, VTE represents the third leading cause of vascular disease.1, 2, 3 VTE is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, accounting for >200 000 deaths in the United States annually.4 The yearly economic burden of VTE is substantial, with estimated US healthcare costs totaling $10 billion.5 In September 2008, the US Surgeon General released a Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism,6 urging a coordinated multifaceted plan to reduce the number of VTE cases nationwide. At the same time, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services discontinued reimbursing hospitals for the marginal cost of treating certain preventable hospital‐acquired conditions, including VTE after joint arthroplasty surgeries.7 More recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services instituted the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program,8, 9 penalizing hospitals for greater than expected 30‐day readmission rates after certain conditions and procedures. These programs have to date been successful10, 11 and have motivated interest in expanding the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program to other disorders. Despite the commonality of VTE and its significant costs to the healthcare system, the burden of nationwide readmissions has not yet been comprehensively assessed. With these data, practitioners can identify areas for intervention and opportunities for prevention. Therefore, we examined nationwide hospital readmission data from 2010 through 2014 to determine the rate, predictors, and causes of 30‐day readmission after acute VTE. In addition, we sought to examine whether variations in risk‐standardized readmission rates (RSRRs), a measure of healthcare quality, exist between US hospitals.

Methods

Data Source

The data used in this analysis are available to other researchers for purposes of reproducing the results or replicating the procedure. The data set is publicly available for purchase online.12 We examined data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) between 2010 and 2014. The NRD is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality as part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and collects discharge data from 22 geographically dispersed states. The NRD includes data from all payers and the uninsured and is composed of >100 clinical and nonclinical variables for each hospital stay. These data include International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) diagnosis and procedure codes, Clinical Classification Software (CCS) diagnosis and procedure classifications, patient demographics, expected payment sources, and total charges and hospital costs based on cost/charge ratios. Weights are provided to calculate national estimates. Research using the NRD was deemed not to qualify as human subjects research by the Institutional Review Board at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA) because of the deidentified nature of the data, and no informed consent was required.

Study Population

All adult hospitalizations (>18 years of age) between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014, associated with a diagnosis code for acute VTE were identified (N=1 431 552) (Figure S1). Acute VTE included PE and DVT. Diagnosis codes in any billing position were included to capture all admissions associated with acute VTE. These codes are shown in Table S1. Because the NRD does not track readmissions between years, data from December of each year did not contribute admissions (N=115 659), allowing 30 days of follow‐up for every patient. All analyses were performed using unweighted data. Of 1 315 893 hospitalizations associated with acute VTE, admissions were excluded if the hospitalization occurred in a state outside the patient's primary residence (N=66 873), because any readmission in a state different from the index hospital's state would not be captured by the NRD. Multiple VTE hospitalizations involving the same patient were allowed as long as they occurred >30 days after any previously included VTE hospitalization or readmission. However, a second VTE hospitalization within 30 days of another by the same patient was counted only as a readmission (excluded N=72 685).

Patient, Hospitalization, and Institutional Characteristics

Chronic conditions were determined on the basis of the 29 Elixhauser comorbidities provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.13 Because tobacco use is not included in this list, we used ICD‐9‐CM diagnosis codes to define smoking status (Table S1). To ascertain comorbid conditions associated with acute VTE, we identified claims codes for surgical procedures, trauma, malignancy, hypercoagulability, and pregnancy charged during the same admission (Table S1). Acute VTE associated with recent surgery was defined by a surgical billing code charged during the same hospitalization as the VTE event. Surgical procedures were included if they met at least 2 of 3 criteria: (1) surgery that typically requires ≥1 night stay; (2) surgery that requires some period of immobility; and (3) surgery that is likely to require general anesthesia. Acute VTE associated with recent trauma was defined by a billing code for trauma charged during the same hospitalization as the VTE event. Characteristics of the index hospitalization included type of acute VTE, length of stay, discharge destination, and costs. Institutional characteristics included bed volume, ownership, and teaching status. In‐hospital procedures included systemic thrombolysis, pulmonary endarterectomy, mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal circulation, and inferior vena cava filter placement. In‐hospital adverse events included major bleeding, acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina, cardiogenic shock, cardiorespiratory arrest, and acute heart failure.

Study Outcomes

For the first objective, the outcome was unplanned all‐cause 30‐day readmission rate, defined as the occurrence of a hospitalization for any cause within 30 days of discharge after an index hospitalization. Readmissions that were coded as “nonelective” within the NRD were considered unplanned. To further explore this outcome, we analyzed predictors and causes of unplanned 30‐day readmission. Reasons for readmission were determined on the basis of CCS codes, a categorization scheme developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality based on ICD‐9‐CM coding14 (Data S1). We used CCS categories 103 (pulmonary heart disease) and 118 (phlebitis; thrombophlebitis and thromboembolism) to categorize causes of readmission attributable to recurrent VTE or disease processes directly related to acute VTE. The CCS categorization of “pulmonary heart disease” includes diagnosis codes for recurrent PE; chronic pulmonary heart disease, including pulmonary hypertension; and other diseases of the pulmonary circulation. The CCS categorization of “thrombophlebitis” includes diagnosis codes for thrombophlebitis, recurrent DVT, and chronic DVT. For the second objective, the primary outcome was hospital‐specific 30‐day RSRRs. To make these estimates, a hierarchical logistic regression model accounting for differences in hospital case mix was developed, as described later.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were reported as counts and percentages, and continuous variables were reported as means with SDs. Between‐group differences were assessed using Fisher's exact or χ2 tests for categorical variables and Student t or Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables. The Mantel‐Haenszel test for trend was used to assess for changes in readmission rates across study years. To derive predictors of 30‐day readmission, hierarchical modified Poisson models were developed. We estimated risk ratios directly using modified Poisson regression models with robust standard errors instead of odds ratios because of the high readmission rates.15 These models were clustered by hospital per year, because the NRD does not track hospitals across years. Candidate variables for the models were determined on the basis of clinical experience and prior literature (Table S2). To establish parsimonious models, we used a backward selection process until 90% of the full model R2 was retained.16 To estimate RSRRs across hospitals, we used hospital data from 2014, because the NRD does not track hospitals across years. For this analysis, we adapted a previously established approach.17 First, we created a logistic regression model predicting 30‐day readmission to identify variables for risk adjustment. Candidate variables for the model included patient factors, as reported in Table S3. We excluded covariates, such as in‐hospital complications, certain patient demographics (eg, type of insurance), and discharge disposition, because these characteristics may be more related to hospital quality and resource availability. To inform variable selection, we used a modified stepwise logistic regression approach, which involved creating 500 bootstrap samples from the data set. For each sample, we ran a logistic stepwise regression, with both backward and forward selection. The P value to enter was set at 0.05, and the P value to exit was set at 0.01. We retained all risk‐adjustment variables above a 70% cutoff because these demonstrated a strong association with readmission and were clinically relevant. The results of this model are displayed in Table S4. Next, we used hierarchical generalized linear models to estimate RSRRs.17 This approach accounts for within‐hospital correlation of the observed readmissions and assumes that, after adjusting for patient risk and sampling variability, the remaining heterogeneity is attributable to hospital quality.18, 19 Analyses were stratified by type of acute VTE during the index hospitalization (PE versus DVT). For stratified analyses, patients who had both types of VTE during the index admission only contributed data to the PE group. In addition, we examined hospitalizations in which acute VTE was the primary billing diagnosis. Because of the inability to track out‐of‐hospital deaths, we performed a sensitivity analysis examining predictors and causes of readmission among those discharged to home. This was to ensure that discharge to a care facility, which may be associated with greater risk of short‐term death, did not affect our primary findings. A 2‐sided P<0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software v9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Readmissions After Acute VTE

During the study period, there were 1 176 335 hospitalizations associated with acute VTE. In‐hospital death occurred in 6.2% (PE, 7.8%; DVT, 5.5%; both, 5.5%). Among 1 103 742 admissions in which patients survived to discharge, 193 632 were associated with nonelective readmissions at 30 days at a rate of 17.5% (PE, 15.8%; DVT, 19.4%; both, 14.3%). There were an additional 19 536 (1.8%) planned readmissions, which were excluded from the analysis. Weighted on a national level, there were 2 742 947 hospitalizations associated with acute VTE, with 2 577 387 involving patients who survived to discharge, and there were 441 562 readmissions at 30 days. Between years, readmission rates did not significantly differ, ranging from a low of 17.4% in 2013 to a high of 17.7% in 2011 (P=0.10 for trend). Readmissions accrued throughout the follow‐up period, with a readmission rate of 6.6% at 7 days, 8.7% at 10 days, and 14.0% at 20 days (Figure S2). Among cases with identifiable provoking factors associated with acute VTE present during admission, readmission rates were highest when associated with malignancy (23.7%), followed by recent surgery (19.9%), recent trauma (16.4%), hypercoagulability (16.4%), and pregnancy (10.7%). For those with acute DVT, readmission rates were similar among cases involving proximal and distal lower extremity vessels (16.7% versus 16.1%, respectively). During rehospitalization, an additional 8.1% of patients died.

Patient and Hospitalization Characteristics by Readmission Status

Of index hospitalizations associated with acute VTE, 54.6% were associated with DVT, 29.5% were associated with PE, and 15.9% were associated with both. Among cases with identifiable provoking factors associated with VTE present during admission, the plurality was related to malignancy (19.7%), followed by recent surgery (19.3%), recent trauma (4.6%), hypercoagulability (3.3%), and pregnancy (1.0%). Readmitted patients were older, were more often women, had more comorbid conditions, and were primarily insured by Medicare or Medicaid (Table 1). Readmissions occurred more frequently among index hospitalizations for nonelective indications, of longer durations, and in which patients were discharged to a subacute facility (Table 2). These hospitalizations more commonly involved mechanical ventilation and inferior vena cava filter placement, whereas use of systemic thrombolysis was associated with a lower frequency of readmission. Adverse events occurred with greater rates during hospitalizations associated with readmission, particularly major bleeds and acute heart failure.
Table 1

Patient Characteristics of Index Admissions Associated With Acute VTE, Stratified by 30‐Day Readmission Status

VariableAll Index Admissions (N=1 103 742)Nonelective 30‐d Readmission
Yes (n=193 632)No (n=910 110) P Value
VTE<0.001
Pulmonary embolism325 850 (29.5)51 417 (26.6)274 433 (30.2)<0.001
Deep vein thrombosis602 126 (54.6)117 107 (60.5)485 019 (53.3)<0.001
Both175 766 (15.9)25 108 (13.0)150 658 (16.6)<0.001
Saddle pulmonary embolus10 901 (1.0)1095 (0.6)9806 (1.1)<0.001
Acute cor pulmonale1816 (0.2)238 (0.1)1578 (0.2)<0.001
Thrombophlebitis57 040 (5.2)9726 (5.0)47 314 (5.2)0.001
Provoking factors associated with VTE present during admission
Malignancy217 402 (19.7)51 565 (26.6)165 837 (18.2)<0.001
Recent surgery213 163 (19.3)42 454 (21.9)170 709 (18.8)<0.001
Recent trauma50 474 (4.6)8293 (4.3)42 181 (4.6)<0.001
Hypercoagulability36 821 (3.3)6046 (3.1)30 775 (3.4)<0.001
Pregnancy11 043 (1.0)1179 (0.6)9864 (1.1)<0.001
Age, mean±SD, y64.0±17.364.8±16.963.9±17.3<0.001
Female sex580 632 (52.6)102 849 (53.1)477 783 (52.5)<0.001
Primary insurance<0.001
Medicare627 703 (57.0)119 763 (62.0)507 940 (55.9)<0.001
Medicaid122 082 (11.1)27 344 (14.1)94 738 (10.4)<0.001
Private267 365 (24.3)34 767 (18.0)232 598 (25.6)<0.001
Self‐pay40 725 (3.7)5464 (2.8)35 261 (3.9)<0.001
Other43 459 (3.9)5966 (3.1)37 493 (4.1)<0.001
Median household income by residential zip code<0.001
Lowest quartile313 413 (28.8)58 261 (30.5)255 152 (28.5)<0.001
Middle lowest quartile265 269 (24.4)46 036 (24.1)219 233 (24.5)0.001
Middle highest quartile260 176 (23.9)44 513 (23.3)215 663 (24.1)<0.001
Highest quartile247 686 (22.8)41 980 (22.0)205 706 (23.0)<0.001
Residence by county location<0.001
Central counties in metropolitan areas with population ≥1 million364 183 (33.0)71 770 (37.1)292 413 (32.2)<0.001
Fringe counties in metropolitan areas with population ≥1 million274 168 (24.9)49 022 (25.4)225 146 (24.8)<0.001
Counties in metropolitan areas with population 250 000–999 999222 597 (20.2)36 264 (18.8)186 333 (20.5)<0.001
Counties in metropolitan areas with population 50 000–249 99994 783 (8.6)15 055 (7.8)79 728 (8.8)<0.001
Micropolitan counties86 689 (7.9)12 817 (6.6)73 872 (8.1)<0.001
Other59 858 (5.4)8338 (4.3)51 520 (5.7)<0.001
No. of chronic conditions, mean±SD5.6±3.26.6±3.25.5±3.1<0.001
Varicose veins5950 (0.5)662 (0.3)5288 (0.6)<0.001
Obesity174 637 (15.8)28 723 (14.8)145 914 (16.0)<0.001
Current or prior tobacco use275 169 (24.9)48 893 (25.3)226 276 (24.9)<0.001
Hypertension640 841 (58.1)116 883 (60.4)523 958 (57.6)<0.001
Congestive heart failure138 558 (12.6)33 563 (17.3)104 995 (11.5)<0.001
Diabetes mellitus277 924 (25.2)58 271 (30.1)219 653 (24.1)<0.001
Chronic pulmonary disease238 531 (21.6)50 018 (25.8)188 513 (20.7)<0.001
Pulmonary circulation disorders216 282 (19.6)39 899 (20.6)176 383 (19.4)<0.001
Renal disease177 924 (16.1)43 225 (22.3)134 699 (14.8)<0.001
Liver disease32 656 (3.0)7810 (4.0)24 846 (2.7)<0.001
Coagulopathy99 598 (9.0)21 530 (11.1)78 068 (8.6)<0.001
Anemia303 960 (27.5)67 349 (34.8)236 611 (26.0)<0.001
Fluid and electrolyte disorders335 626 (30.4)74 315 (38.4)261 311 (28.7)<0.001
Neurologic disorders/paralysis143 567 (13.0)28 597 (14.8)114 970 (12.6)<0.001
Alcohol abuse40 838 (3.7)7992 (4.1)32 846 (3.6)<0.001
Illicit drug abuse35 702 (3.2)8337 (4.3)27 365 (3.0)<0.001

Data are given as number (percentage) unless otherwise indicated. For most variables, 0% to 2.5% had missing values. VTE indicates venous thromboembolism.

Table 2

Hospitalization and Institutional Characteristics of Index Admissions Associated With Acute VTE, Stratified by 30‐Day Readmission Status

VariableAll Index Admissions (N=1 103 742)Nonelective 30‐d Readmission
Yes (n=193 632)No (n=910 110) P Value
Characteristics of index hospitalization
Elective index admission117 726 (10.7)15 801 (8.2)101 925 (11.2)<0.001
Elective readmission19 536 (1.8)······<0.001
Length of stay, mean±SD, d9.4±13.011.5±14.68.9±12.5<0.001
Disposition at discharge<0.001
Home, no assistance568 369 (51.5)80 071 (41.4)488 298 (53.7)<0.001
Transfer to short‐term hospital14 514 (1.3)2960 (1.5)11 554 (1.3)<0.001
Transfer to subacute nursing or intermediate‐care facility256 964 (23.3)56 968 (29.4)199 996 (22.0)<0.001
Home with home health care253 187 (22.9)50 521 (26.1)202 666 (22.3)<0.001
Against medical advice8704 (0.8)2949 (1.5)5755 (0.6)<0.001
Cost of index hospitalization, median (IQR), $11 208.4 (6127.2–23 529.9)14 739.0 (7917.0–30 518.5)10 573.3 (5851.9–22 043.2)<0.001
Cost of rehospitalization, median (IQR), $···9781.7 (5430.7–18 784.1)······
Characteristics of index hospital
Bed size of hospital<0.001
Small112 428 (10.2)17 033 (8.8)95 395 (10.5)<0.001
Medium267 782 (24.3)45 079 (23.3)222 703 (24.5)<0.001
Large723 532 (65.6)131 520 (67.9)592 012 (65.0)<0.001
Ownership of hospital0.013
Government157 440 (14.3)28 116 (14.5)129 324 (14.2)<0.001
Private, nonprofit769 314 (69.7)134 513 (69.5)634 801 (69.7)0.014
Private, for profit176 988 (16.0)31 003 (16.0)145 985 (16.0)0.751
Teaching status<0.001
Metropolitan, nonteaching452 851 (41.0)76 030 (39.3)376 821 (41.4)<0.001
Metropolitan, teaching564 472 (51.1)106 161 (54.8)458 311 (50.4)<0.001
Nonmetropolitan86 419 (7.8)11 441 (5.9)74 978 (8.2)<0.001
Procedures during index hospitalization
Systemic thrombolysis29 789 (2.7)4231 (2.2)25 558 (2.8)<0.001
Pulmonary endarterectomy131 (0.0)17 (0.0)114 (0.0)0.169
Mechanical ventilation69 239 (6.3)15 395 (8.0)53 844 (5.9)<0.001
Extracorporeal circulation408 (0.0)82 (0.0)326 (0.0)0.174
Inferior vena cava filter placement142 575 (12.9)29 453 (15.2)113 122 (12.4)<0.001
Adverse events during index hospitalization
Major bleed239 633 (21.7)54 587 (28.2)185 046 (20.3)<0.001
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage47 628 (4.3)11 580 (6.0)36 048 (4.0)<0.001
Intracranial hemorrhage15 572 (1.4)2999 (1.5)12 573 (1.4)<0.001
Other bleeding event (including RBC transfusion)210 871 (19.1)48 438 (25.0)162 433 (17.8)<0.001
Acute myocardial infarction/unstable angina30 324 (2.7)6565 (3.4)23 759 (2.6)<0.001
Cardiogenic shock7686 (0.7)1652 (0.9)6034 (0.7)<0.001
Cardiorespiratory arrest9056 (0.8)1925 (1.0)7131 (0.8)<0.001
Acute heart failure174 146 (15.8)42 328 (21.9)131 818 (14.5)<0.001

Data are given as number (percentage) unless otherwise indicated. For most variables, 0% to 2.5% had missing values. IQR indicates interquartile range; RBC, red blood cell; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Patient Characteristics of Index Admissions Associated With Acute VTE, Stratified by 30‐Day Readmission Status Data are given as number (percentage) unless otherwise indicated. For most variables, 0% to 2.5% had missing values. VTE indicates venous thromboembolism. Hospitalization and Institutional Characteristics of Index Admissions Associated With Acute VTE, Stratified by 30‐Day Readmission Status Data are given as number (percentage) unless otherwise indicated. For most variables, 0% to 2.5% had missing values. IQR indicates interquartile range; RBC, red blood cell; VTE, venous thromboembolism. Overall, patient and hospitalization characteristics did not significantly differ from the overall group when stratified by PE and DVT (Tables S5 through S8).

Predictors of 30‐Day Readmission

The strongest predictors of readmission included a diagnosis of malignancy (relative risk [RR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47–1.50), nonelective index admission (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.29–1.33), and insurance status (Medicaid: RR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.46–1.50]; Medicare: RR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.29–1.33]) (Figure 1). Discharge to a subacute facility (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.24–1.27) or home with additional care (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.18–1.21) was also associated with increased readmission risk. Hospitalizations associated with acute DVT had a stronger relationship with need for readmission compared with those associated with acute PE (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11–1.14). Predictors of readmission did not significantly vary when stratified by PE and DVT (Figures S3 and S4), nor did they differ among those discharged to home (Figure S5).
Figure 1

Displayed is a forest plot with predictors of nonelective 30‐day readmission after acute venous thromboembolism. The strongest predictors included malignancy, nonelective index hospitalization, insurance type (Medicaid and Medicare), acute heart failure exacerbation, and discharge to a short‐term facility. Risk estimates are relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism.

Displayed is a forest plot with predictors of nonelective 30‐day readmission after acute venous thromboembolism. The strongest predictors included malignancy, nonelective index hospitalization, insurance type (Medicaid and Medicare), acute heart failure exacerbation, and discharge to a short‐term facility. Risk estimates are relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism.

Reasons for 30‐Day Readmission

Sepsis was the primary indication for readmission (9.6%), followed by procedural complications (8.1%) and issues related to malignancy (6.9%) (Figure 2). Recurrent VTE and disease processes directly related to acute VTE, which are categorized as “recurrent DVT/thrombophlebitis” and “pulmonary heart disease,” composed 9.4% of all causes for readmission. The most frequent reason for rehospitalization among those with acute PE was directly related to the disease process (pulmonary heart disease, 7.9%), whereas for acute DVT, causes were more often related to complications from comorbid conditions (sepsis, 10.8%; procedural complications, 9.7%). Reasons for readmission were overall similar among those discharged to home (Figure S6).
Figure 2

The figure displays the main reasons for 30‐day readmission. The most common cause of readmission was sepsis, followed by procedural complications and issues related to malignancy. DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis.

The figure displays the main reasons for 30‐day readmission. The most common cause of readmission was sepsis, followed by procedural complications and issues related to malignancy. DVT indicates deep vein thrombosis.

Healthcare Costs Associated With VTE Readmissions

The median cost of a readmission after a hospitalization for acute VTE was $9782 (interquartile range, $5431–$18 784), with a nationally weighted annual cost totaling $1.44 billion. Including the median cost of the index admission ($14 739; interquartile range, $7917–$30 519), the median total inpatient healthcare cost associated with an acute VTE hospitalization that required a readmission was $24 521 (interquartile range, $13 348–$49 303).

Heterogeneity in Readmission Risk Between Hospitals

After standardizing for hospital case mix, the median RSRR for all institutions in 2014 was 17.4%. RSRRs ranged from 11.0% to 27.4% across hospitals, with an interquartile range of 16.6% to 18.3% (Figure 3). The fifth percentile was 14.9%, and the 95th percentile was 21.3%.
Figure 3

Frequency of 30‐day risk‐standardized readmission rates across institutions in 2014. Displayed on the X‐axis are the hospital‐specific 30‐day risk‐standardized readmission rates for each hospital included in the study. Displayed on the Y‐axis are the frequencies of hospitals with the specific risk‐standardized readmission rate.

Frequency of 30‐day risk‐standardized readmission rates across institutions in 2014. Displayed on the X‐axis are the hospital‐specific 30‐day risk‐standardized readmission rates for each hospital included in the study. Displayed on the Y‐axis are the frequencies of hospitals with the specific risk‐standardized readmission rate.

Hospitalizations With Acute VTE as Primary Billing Diagnosis

Of all hospitalizations, 49.7% (N=548 413) were associated with a primary diagnosis of acute VTE (Tables S9 and S10). The 30‐day unplanned readmission rate among these patients was 13.3%. Predictors of 30‐day nonelective readmission were similar to the overall study cohort (Figure S7), whereas the primary causes of readmission were more often related to VTE (recurrent DVT/thrombophlebitis, 8.8%; pulmonary heart disease, 8.1%) (Figure S8). Among patients readmitted, an additional 6.3% experienced an in‐hospital death.

Discussion

Among >1.1 million US hospitalizations associated with acute VTE, the short‐term readmission rate was substantial, with ≈1 in 5 rehospitalized within 30 days. These readmissions were costly, with ≈$10 000 in median additional healthcare expenditures per rehospitalization. Predictors and causes of readmission were primarily associated with patient characteristics and complications related to comorbid conditions. After standardizing for hospital case mix, there was only moderate heterogeneity in readmission rates between institutions. Acute VTE is a major public health problem, with an incidence that is steadily increasing because of the aging population, increasing rates of comorbid conditions associated with VTE (eg, obesity and malignancy), and improved detection on imaging studies.1, 20 This disease process is also complex, involving the interaction between acquired and inherited predispositions for thrombosis. Many of these factors are related to external causes, such as hospitalization for surgery or trauma, pregnancy, prolonged immobilization, and active malignancy.1 This heterogeneity in presentation and risk factors makes caring for these patients challenging and has prompted the development of formalized, multifaceted, team‐based approaches.21 Beyond the direct costs accrued during the index hospitalization, our analysis demonstrates the substantial economic burden incurred by the US healthcare system because of short‐term readmissions related to acute VTE. Readmissions were frequent (17.5% by 30 days), costly (median, ≈$10 000/rehospitalization), and often fatal (8% in‐hospital death). Our findings complement a prior study, which found that the costs for VTE treatment are increasing faster than general inflation for medical care services.22 Notably, hospitalization costs were the primary cost driver in that analysis, with readmission‐related expenses representing a large component. In this study, most readmissions were secondary to complications from an underlying illness or perioperative condition, whereas a smaller proportion was attributable to recurrent VTE or a directly related disease process (9.4%). This relationship was more pronounced among those with acute DVT, which tends to complicate acquired conditions more often than PE.23 Predictors of 30‐day readmission were primarily related to patient comorbidities (eg, malignancy and renal failure), socioeconomic status (eg, Medicaid insurance), and frailty (eg, Medicare insurance, longer index hospitalizations, and requiring discharge to subacute facilities). These results parallel a prior analysis of patients hospitalized with acute PE in the state of Pennsylvania.24 More important, when examining patients admitted with a primary VTE diagnosis, the readmission rate was lower, but remained substantial (13.3%). In addition, predictors of readmission were similar to the overall cohort. Although there was a greater prevalence of readmissions for illnesses directly related to VTE (16.9%), this remained a minority of all causes. Between studied institutions, there was modest heterogeneity in standardized readmission rates. In comparison, greater variation has been observed for currently penalized conditions, such as heart failure.25 As such, programs designed to penalize institutional outliers, similar to the mandate of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, may have less of an impact on improving outcomes for this disease process. Taken together, the findings from this analysis should raise awareness to the large burden of readmissions that follow hospitalizations associated with acute VTE and the need to find effective strategies to reduce these events. Patient‐oriented interventions, including early postdischarge follow‐up, home health services, and confirmation of therapeutic anticoagulation, may be helpful for patients with high‐risk comorbidities and complicated hospitalizations. Similar out‐of‐hospital initiatives have been effective for other conditions.26 In addition, implementation of collaborative treatment teams for patients with acute VTE may be useful for coordinating in‐hospital care, determining safe therapeutic strategies, and organizing treatment plans after discharge.21 This analysis must be interpreted in the context of the study design. First, acute VTE cases were identified through use of ICD‐9‐CM codes, which may result in the misclassification of acute VTE cases. For instance, ICD‐9‐CM codes are lacking for acute DVT, whereas there are ICD‐9‐CM codes to document chronic DVT. However, prior studies of VTE have demonstrated that in up to 96% of cases, ICD‐9‐CM codes corresponded with documented disease on medical record review.23, 24 Second, we lacked data on the incidence of out‐of‐hospital death after discharge. As such, our results may have been influenced by survivorship bias. To support that this effect was minimal, we performed a sensitivity analysis examining only hospitalizations in which patients underwent routine discharge home, a cohort who may have a lower risk of short‐term death. These results did not vary significantly from our overall results (Figures S5 and S6). Third, we did not have data on the timing, type, and intensity of anticoagulation after the diagnosis of acute VTE, nor confirmatory testing among those with a diagnosis of primary hypercoagulability. Fourth, standardization of readmission rates for case mix using claims data may be subject to residual confounding. In addition, we chose to use risk standardization methods similar to those used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that involve shrinkage of hospital estimates toward the mean. These methods may reduce the estimated variability in hospital readmission rates, particularly among lower‐volume institutions. Fifth, among those with primary admissions for conditions other than VTE, such as for surgery, we are unable to determine the extent to which VTE caused the readmission above the risk secondary to the primary condition. Last, this analysis included data from a sample of US states and may not be generalizable to other populations, including those abroad.

Conclusions

Short‐term readmission after acute VTE is common in the United States and associated with high healthcare costs and mortality. Readmissions are primarily related to patient characteristics and complications from comorbid conditions, whereas healthcare quality only modestly affects readmission risk. Further research is needed to identify and validate effective interventions to reduce these frequent and costly readmissions that follow acute VTE events.

Sources of Funding

This study was internally funded through the Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA).

Disclosures

Jaff is a compensated advisor for Philips/Volcano and Venarum (modest); an equity investor for Embolitech, Vascular Therapies, PQ Bypass, MC10, Jana Care, and Sano V (modest); and a compensated board member of VIVA Physicians, a 501c3 not‐for‐profit education and research organization (modest). Rosenfield is a compensated advisor for Abbott Vascular, Cardinal Health, Surmodics, Inari Medical, Volcano/Phillips, and Proteon (modest); has received stock options for serving on advisory boards from Contego, Access Vascular, and MD Insider (modest); holds stock in Embolitech, Janacare, Primacea, and PQ Bypass (modest); has received grant support to his institution from Abbott Vascular, Atrium/Maquet, and Lutonix/Bard (modest); has served as a consultant to Capture Vascular, Shockwave, and the University of Maryland (modest); has received research grant support from Inari Medical and the National Institutes of Health (modest); has received equity or stock options from Capture Vascular, VORTEX, Micell, Shockwave, Cruzar Systems, Endospan, Eximo, Valcare, and Contego (modest); has received an honorarium from Cook (modest); and is a compensated board member of VIVA Physicians, a 501c3 not‐for‐profit education and research organization (modest). The remaining authors have no disclosures to report. Data S1. Supplemental Methods. Table S1. Diagnosis and Procedure Billing Codes Table S2. Candidate Variables for 30‐Day Readmission Prediction Models Table S3. Candidate Variables for 30‐Day Risk Standardization Readmissions Model Table S4. 30‐Day Readmission Logistic Regression Model Table S5. Patient Characteristics of Index Admissions Associated With Acute Pulmonary Embolism, Stratified by 30‐Day Readmission Status Table S6. Hospitalization and Institutional Characteristics of Index Admissions Associated With Acute Pulmonary Embolism, Stratified By 30‐Day Readmission Status Table S7. Patient Characteristics of Index Hospitalizations Associated With Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis, Stratified By 30‐Day Readmission Status Table S8. Hospitalization and Institutional Characteristics of Index Admissions Associated With Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis, Stratified By 30‐day Readmission Status Table S9. Patient Characteristics of Index Hospitalizations Associated With a Primary Diagnosis Code for Venous Thromboembolism, Stratified By 30‐Day Readmission Status Table S10. Hospitalization and Institutional Characteristics of Index Admissions Associated With a Primary Diagnosis Code for Venous Thromboembolism, Stratified By 30‐Day Readmission Status Figure S1. Flow diagram of selection of hospitalizations. Figure S2. Cumulative incidences of readmission through 30 days after discharge following hospitalizations associated with acute venous thromboembolism. Figure S3. Predictors of 30‐day readmission following hospitalizations associated with acute pulmonary embolism. Figure S4. Predictors of 30‐day readmission following hospitalizations associated with acute deep vein thrombosis. Figure S5. Predictors of 30‐day readmission following hospitalizations associated with acute venous thromboembolism for patients discharged to home. Figure S6. Top causes of non‐elective 30‐day readmission following hospitalizations associated with acute venous thromboembolism for patients discharged to home. Figure S7. Predictors of 30‐day readmission following hospitalizations associated with a primary diagnosis code for venous thromboembolism. Figure S8. Top causes of non‐elective 30‐day readmission following hospitalizations associated with a primary diagnosis code for venous thromboembolism. Click here for additional data file.
  19 in total

1.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Predictors of early hospital readmission after acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Drahomir Aujesky; Maria K Mor; Ming Geng; Roslyn A Stone; Michael J Fine; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-09

3.  An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day all-cause readmission rates among patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Harlan M Krumholz; Zhenqiu Lin; Elizabeth E Drye; Mayur M Desai; Lein F Han; Michael T Rapp; Jennifer A Mattera; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-03

4.  CMS reimbursement reform and the incidence of hospital-acquired pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Risha Gidwani; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Hospital strategies associated with 30-day readmission rates for patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie Curry; Leora I Horwitz; Heather Sipsma; Yongfei Wang; Mary Norine Walsh; Don Goldmann; Neal White; Ileana L Piña; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-07

6.  Comparison of outcomes after hospitalization for deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Susan Murin; Patrick S Romano; Richard H White
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  A Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: Initial 30-Month Experience With a Novel Approach to Delivery of Care to Patients With Submassive and Massive Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Christopher Kabrhel; Rachel Rosovsky; Richard Channick; Michael R Jaff; Ido Weinberg; Thoralf Sundt; David M Dudzinski; Josanna Rodriguez-Lopez; Blair A Parry; Savanah Harshbarger; Yuchiao Chang; Kenneth Rosenfield
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Patterns of hospital performance in acute myocardial infarction and heart failure 30-day mortality and readmission.

Authors:  Harlan M Krumholz; Angela R Merrill; Eric M Schone; Geoffrey C Schreiner; Jersey Chen; Elizabeth H Bradley; Yun Wang; Yongfei Wang; Zhenqiu Lin; Barry M Straube; Michael T Rapp; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Elizabeth E Drye
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-07-09

9.  Readmission Rates After Passage of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: A Pre-Post Analysis.

Authors:  Jason H Wasfy; Corwin Matthew Zigler; Christine Choirat; Yun Wang; Francesca Dominici; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Debunking Paradoxes: Integrating Complexity in Cardiovascular Disease Research Among Latino Populations.

Authors:  Sandra E Echeverria
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  8 in total

1.  Contemporary impacts of a cancer diagnosis on survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Avirup Guha; Benjamin Buck; Michael Biersmith; Sameer Arora; Vedat Yildiz; Lai Wei; Farrukh Awan; Jennifer Woyach; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Juan Carlos Plana-Gomez; Guilherme H Oliveira; Michael G Fradley; Daniel Addison
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  The Use of Cement and Tourniquet During Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Increase the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Postoperatively.

Authors:  Leanne Ludwick; Noam Shohat; Matthew B Sherman; Joseph Paladino; Jonathan Ledesma; Yale Fillingham
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-09-27

3.  Impact of pharmacist-conducted anticoagulation patient education and telephone follow-up on transitions of care: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lamis R Karaoui; Elsy Ramia; Hanine Mansour; Nisrine Haddad; Nibal Chamoun
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Acute pulmonary embolism following recent hospitalization or surgery.

Authors:  Colby Shanafelt; Rahul Aggarwal; Tyler Mehegan; Abby Pribish; Kevin Soriano; Andrew Dicks; Eric A Secemsky; Brett J Carroll
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Personalized Risk Prediction for 30-Day Readmissions With Venous Thromboembolism Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Jung In Park; Doyub Kim; Jung-Ah Lee; Kai Zheng; Alpesh Amin
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.176

6.  Metal-Organic-Framework-Derived Carbon Nanostructures for Site-Specific Dual-Modality Photothermal/Photodynamic Thrombus Therapy.

Authors:  Fengrong Zhang; Yuehong Liu; Jiani Lei; Shunhao Wang; Xunming Ji; Huiyu Liu; Qi Yang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 16.806

7.  Reducing Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism Using a Multicomponent Care Transition Intervention.

Authors:  Alok Kapoor; Sarah Bloomstone; Saud Javed; Matt Silva; Ann Lynch; Dinesh Yogaratnam; Brian Carlone; Katelyn Springer; Abiramy Maheswaran; Xiaoshuang Chen; Ahmed Nagy; Rasha Elhag; Edna Markaddy; Timothy Aungst; Donna Bartlett; Diana Houng; Chad Darling; David McManus; Shoshana J Herzig; Bruce Barton; Kathy Mazor
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in a real-world pulmonary embolism population: Interim results of the FLASH registry.

Authors:  Catalin Toma; Matthew C Bunte; Kenneth H Cho; Wissam A Jaber; Jeffrey Chambers; Brian Stegman; Sreedevi Gondi; Daniel A Leung; Michael Savin; Sameer Khandhar; Herman Kado; Gerald Koenig; Mitchell Weinberg; Robert E Beasley; Jon Roberts; Wesley Angel; Michael G Sarosi; Osama Qaqi; Kalyan Veerina; Michael A Brown; Jeffrey S Pollak
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.585

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.