Literature DB >> 29944576

Patient Perceptions and Quality of Life After Colon and Rectal Surgery: What Do Patients Really Want?

Sean M Wrenn1, Antonio Cepeda-Benito2, Diego I Ramos-Valadez3, Peter A Cataldo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal surgery outcomes must be accurately assessed and aligned with patient priorities. No study to date has investigated the patient's subjective assessment of outcomes most important to them during and following their surgical recovery. Although surgeons greatly value the benefits of laparoscopy, patient priorities remain understudied.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess what aspects of patients' perioperative care and recovery they value most when queried in the postoperative period.
DESIGN: This study is an exploratory cross-sectional investigation of a defined retrospective patient population. Enrollees were stratified into subcategories and analyzed, with statistical analysis performed via χ test and unpaired t test. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single academic medical center in New England. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent a colorectal surgical resection between 2009 and 2015 were selected.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients within a preidentified population were asked to voluntarily complete a 32-item questionnaire regarding their surgical care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were patient perioperative and postoperative quality of life and satisfaction on selected areas of functioning.
RESULTS: Of 167 queried respondents, 92.2% were satisfied with their recovery. Factors considered most important included being cured of colorectal cancer (76%), not having a permanent stoma (78%), and avoiding complications (74%). Least important included length of stay (13%), utilization of laparoscopy (14%), and incision appearance and length (2%, 4%). LIMITATIONS: The study had a relatively low response rate, the study is susceptible to responder's bias, and there is temporal variability from surgery to questionnaire within the patient population.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients reported high satisfaction with their care. Most important priorities included being free of cancer, stoma, and surgical complications. In contrast, outcomes traditionally important to surgeons such as laparoscopy, incision appearance, and length of stay were deemed less important. This research helps elucidate the outcomes patients truly consider valuable, and surgeons should focus on these outcomes when making surgical decisions. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A596. See Visual Abstract at https://tinyurl.com/yb25xl66.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29944576     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

1.  Stage- and age-adjusted cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Javier Mar; Ane Anton-Ladislao; Oliver Ibarrondo; Arantzazu Arrospide; Santiago Lázaro-Aramburu; Nerea Gonzalez; Marisa Bare; Antonio Escobar; Maximino Redondo; José M Quintana
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A National study on the adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population: current state and value proposition.

Authors:  D S Keller; J Qiu; R P Kiran
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Association of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy on the long-term health-related quality of life of colon cancer survivors.

Authors:  Melissa S Y Thong; Lina Jansen; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Volker Arndt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Minimally Invasive Endoscopic and Surgical Management of Rectal Neoplasia.

Authors:  Sarah S Al Ghamdi; Ira Leeds; Sandy Fang; Saowanee Ngamruengphong
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Patient-Reported Bowel Function in Patients With Rectal Cancer Managed by a Watch-and-Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Felipe F Quezada-Diaz; J Joshua Smith; Rosa M Jimenez-Rodriguez; Isaac Wasserman; Emmanouil P Pappou; Sujata Patil; Iris H Wei; Garrett M Nash; Jose G Guillem; Martin R Weiser; Philip B Paty; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.412

6.  Selected stage IV rectal cancer patients managed by the watch-and-wait approach after pelvic radiotherapy: a good alternative to total mesorectal excision surgery?

Authors:  Petra A Custers; Britt J P Hupkens; Brechtje A Grotenhuis; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Stéphanie O Breukink; Geerard L Beets; Jarno Melenhorst
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.917

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.