Literature DB >> 29944164

Sub-optimal Application of a High SPF Sunscreen Prevents Epidermal DNA Damage in Vivo.

Antony R Young1, Jessica Greenaway, Graham I Harrison, Karl P Lawrence, Robert Sarkany, Thierry Douki, France Boyer, Gwendal Josse, Emmanuel Questel, Camille Monteil, Ana B Rossi.   

Abstract

The cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) is a potentially mutagenic DNA photolesion that is the basis of most skin cancers. There are no data on DNA protection by sunscreens under typical conditions of use. The study aim was to determine such protection, in phototypes I/II, with representative sunscreen-user application. A very high SPF formulation was applied at 0.75, 1.3 and 2.0 mg/cm2. Unprotected control skin was exposed to 4 standard erythema doses (SED) of solar simulated UVR, and sunscreen-treated sites to 30 SED. Holiday behaviour was also simulated by UVR exposure for 5 consecutive days. Control skin received 1 SED daily, and sunscreen-treated sites received 15 (all 3 application thicknesses) or 30 (2.0 mg/cm2) SED daily. CPD were assessed by quantitative HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) and semi-quantitative immunostaining. In comparison with unprotected control sites, sunscreen significantly (p ≤ 0.001-0.05) reduced DNA damage at 1.3 and 2.0 mg/cm2 in all cases. However, reduction with typical sunscreen use (0.75 mg/cm2) was non-significant, with the exception of HPLC-MS/MS data for the 5-day study (p <0.001). Overall, these results support sunscreen use as a strategy to reduce skin cancer, and demonstrate that public health messages must stress better sunscreen application to get maximal benefit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNAprotection; cyclobutanepyrimidinedimers; photoprotection; sunscreen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29944164     DOI: 10.2340/00015555-2992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol        ISSN: 0001-5555            Impact factor:   4.437


  5 in total

1.  Incidence and public health burden of sunburn among beachgoers in the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie DeFlorio-Barker; Dawn Holman; Robert Landolfi; Benjamin F Arnold; John M Colford; Stephen B Weisberg; Kenneth C Schiff; Elizabeth A Sams; Timothy J Wade
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status.

Authors:  T Passeron; R Bouillon; V Callender; T Cestari; T L Diepgen; A C Green; J C van der Pols; B A Bernard; F Ly; F Bernerd; L Marrot; M Nielsen; M Verschoore; N G Jablonski; A R Young
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Optimal sunscreen use, during a sun holiday with a very high ultraviolet index, allows vitamin D synthesis without sunburn.

Authors:  A R Young; J Narbutt; G I Harrison; K P Lawrence; M Bell; C O'Connor; P Olsen; K Grys; K A Baczynska; M Rogowski-Tylman; H C Wulf; A Lesiak; P A Philipsen
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 4.  Vitamin D Update.

Authors:  Mary S Matsui
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2020-10-14

5.  Consensus statement from 2nd International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D.

Authors:  A Giustina; R A Adler; N Binkley; J Bollerslev; R Bouillon; B Dawson-Hughes; P R Ebeling; D Feldman; A M Formenti; M Lazaretti-Castro; C Marcocci; R Rizzoli; C T Sempos; J P Bilezikian
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 6.514

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.