Literature DB >> 29943272

Heart Valve Disease Awareness Survey 2017: what did we achieve since 2015?

Luise Gaede1, Lars Aarberge2, George Brandon Bravo Bruinsma3, Philip Macarthy4, Francesco Musumeci5, Pepe Zamorano6, Helge Möllmann7.   

Abstract

AIMS: The 2015 Heart Valve Disease Awareness Survey showed a low knowledge and awareness about heart valve disease in the general population despite its high prevalence and morbidity. The 2017 survey was conducted to re-evaluate concern and knowledge about heart valve disease after 2 years of rapidly increasing patient numbers presenting with heart valve disease. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 12,820 people aged 60 years or older in 11 European countries took part in the survey. While the number of people concerned most about heart valve disease increased significantly (2015:1.7% vs. 2017:2.1%; p < 0.001), it is still very low compared to cancer (28.8%) or Alzheimer's disease (20.9%). More people claim to be familiar with heart valve disease in general (2015: 17.1% vs. 2017: 20.0%; p < 0.001) and the majority claims to know of at least one therapy for heart valve disease (61.9%). Nevertheless, only 3.8% could correctly identify aortic stenosis (AS), which is significantly less than in 2015 (7.2%; p < 0.001). As before, the majority of the respondents claimed to rarely or never undergo a stethoscope check from their general practitioner (2015: 54.2% vs. 2017: 50.6%, p < 0.001); nevertheless, a positive trend can be seen. People wish heart valve disease to be part of regular checks by the general practitioners.
CONCLUSION: The general population's knowledge of heart valve disease in general slightly increased over the last 2 years. However, detailed understanding of aortic stenosis and its treatment options is still low, as is the level of concern shown for heart valve disease. Nevertheless, the general population cites heart valve disease as a condition they wish to be checked for regularly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Awareness; Heart valve disease; Knowledge; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29943272     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-018-1312-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Onco-cardiologist Dilemma: to Implant, to Defer, or to Avoid Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Cancer Patients with Aortic Stenosis?

Authors:  Serban Mihai Balanescu; Dinu Valentin Balanescu; Teodora Donisan; Eric H Yang; Nicolas Palaskas; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Saamir Hassan; Peter Kim; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Biswajit Kar; Cezar Iliescu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  The multivariable prognostic models for severe complications after heart valve surgery.

Authors:  Yunqi Liu; Jiefei Xiao; Xiaoying Duan; Xingwei Lu; Xin Gong; Jiantao Chen; Mai Xiong; Shengli Yin; Xiaobo Guo; Zhongkai Wu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 3.  Shared Decision-Making and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  Sahrai Saeed; Elisabeth Skaar; Andrea Romarheim; John B Chambers; Øyvind Bleie
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  European heart health survey 2019.

Authors:  Luise Gaede; Marta Sitges; Johnson Neil; Eleonara Selvi; William Woan; Richard Derks; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  A survey of general practitioners' knowledge and clinical practice in relation to valvular heart disease.

Authors:  John P Birrane; Zi Lun Lim; Chee H Liew; Liesbeth Rosseel; Adrienne Heerey; Kieran Coleman; Joseph Gallagher; Darren Mylotte; John W McEvoy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 1.568

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.