| Literature DB >> 29942932 |
Matem Tunçdemir1, Güven Yenmiş1,2, Kübra Tombultürk1,3, Hülya Arkan1, Tuğba Soydaş1, Rasit Burak Tek4, Özlem Altıntaş1, Hamdi Özkara4, Gönül Kanıgür-Sultuybek5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A notable proportion of idiopathic male infertility cases is accompanied by oligozoospermia; and yet, the molecular mechanisms of fertilization problem underlying this defect are still unclear. Epithelial cadherin has been involved in several calcium-dependent cell-to-cell adhesion events; however, its participation in gamete interaction has also not been fully investigated.Entities:
Keywords: E-Cadherin; Male infertility; Mir-146a; Nuclear factor kappa B; Oligospermia
Year: 2018 PMID: 29942932 PMCID: PMC6004596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Reprod Biomed ISSN: 2476-3772
Figure 1The enzyme digestion pattern of rs28362491. M is 50-bp size marker; Lane 5 and 6 are heterozygous ins/del ATTG; Lane 2, 3 and 4 are homozygous ins/ins ATTG; Lane 1 and 7 are del/del ATTG homozygous
Figure 2The enzyme digestion pattern of rs2910164. M is 50-bp size marker; Lane 1 is wild-type homozygous alleles (C/C); Lane 2, 3 and 4 are mutant type homozygous alleles (G/G); Lane 5 and 6 are heterozygous alleles (C/G
Figure 3Immunoreactivity of E-cadherin. Control groups ins/ins (A), del/ins (B) and del/del (C). Case group; ins/ins (D), del/ins (E) and del/del (F). Red staining cells: E-cadherin (+) sperms (↑). Background: Methyl green- Bar: 20µm
Clinical feature of (cases) and controls included in the study
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 33.03 ± 5.24 | 30.75 ± 9.356 | 0.0783 | |
| Sperm concentration (×106/ml) | 4.79 ± 4.12 | 34.93 ± 26.40 | <0.0001 | |
| Sperm motility (%) | 24.62 ± 20.56 | 41.89 ± 19.38 | 0.0016 | |
| Sperm morphology (%) | 3.56 ± 3.38 | 7.556 ± 4.878 | 0.0021 | |
| Testicular volume | ||||
| Right (ml) | 13.63 ± 6.05 | 15.61 ± 9.562 | 0.8693 | |
| Left (ml) | 14.04 ± 6.27 | 15.72 ± 8.870 | 0.9011 | |
Data are shown as mean±SD
Groups were compared by Mann Whitney U test
Distribution of genotype and allele frequencies of SNPs rs28362491 and rs29101164 in (case group) and controls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | 73 (55.7) | 120 (50.2) | 1 | Ref |
| GC | 50 (38.2) | 108 (45.2) | 1.314 (0.8429-2.048) | 0.2274 |
| CC | 8 (6.1) | 11 (4.6) | 0.8365 (0.3215-2.176) | 0.9052 |
| Dominant model ((GG+ GC) vs CC) | 0.7418 (0.2906-1.893) | 0.7034 | ||
| Recessive model (GG vs (GC + CC)) | 1.248 (0.8135-1.915) | 0.3097 | ||
| G allele | 196 (74.8) | 348 (72.8) | 1 | Ref |
| C allele | 66 (25.2) | 130 (27.2) | 1.109 (0.7863-1.565) | 0.5543 |
| rs28362491 | ||||
| ins/ins | 51 (38.9) | 67 (28) | 1 | Ref |
| del/ins | 61 (47.3) | 141 (59) | 1.1731 (1.081-2.773) | 0.0218 |
| del/del | 18 (13.8) | 31 (13) | 1.311 (0.6604-2.603) | 0.5469 |
| Dominant model ((ins/ins+del/ins) vs del/del) | 0.9356 (0.5011-1.747) | 0.9613 | ||
| Recessive model(ins/ins vs (del/ins+del/del)) | 1.637 (1.043-2.568) | 0.0315 | ||
| ins allele | 164 (62.6) | 275 (57.5) | 1 | Ref |
| del allele | 98 (37.4) | 203 (42.5) | 1.235 (0.9068-1.683) | 0.1799 |
Data presented as n (%). Groups were compared by χ2 analysis and Yates’s Continuity Correction.
The differences resulting from the genotypes were determined by proceeding χ2 analysis and Yates’s Continuity Correction.
Combined genotypes of rs8362491 and rs29101164 in case group and fertile controls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ins/ins/GG | 19 (16.4) | 27 (11.3) | 1 | Ref |
| del/ins/GG | 34 (29.3) | 76 (31.8) | 1.573 (0.7711-3.209) | 0.2113 |
| del/del/GG | 11 (9.5) | 17 (7.1) | 1.088 (0.4167-2.838) | 0.9421 |
| ins/ins/GC | 12 (10.3) | 37(15.5) | 2.170 (0.9029-5.214) | 0.1265 |
| del/ins/GC | 24 (20.7) | 59 (24.7) | 1.730 (0.8132-3.680) | 0.2169 |
| del/del/GC | 9 (7.7) | 12 (5) | 0.9383 (0.3300-2.668) | 0.8828 |
| ins/ins/CC | 3 (2.6) | 5 (2.0) | 0.7037 (0.1279-3.871) | 0.9730 |
| del/ins/CC | 3 (2.6) | 6 (2.5) | 1.407 (0.3123-6.342) | 0.9407 |
Data presented as n (%).
del/del/CC combined genotype was not added to statistical analysis due to inadequate number of individuals. The differences resulting from the genotypes were determined by proceeding χ2 analysis, fisher’s exact test and Yates’s continuity correction.
Evaluation of E-cadherin expression according to the genotypes of NFKB1 rs28362491 in men Case group
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ins/ins | 51 (39) | 1.28 ± 0.90 |
| del/ins | 62 (47) | 2.5 ± 1.08 |
| del/del | 18 (14) | 1.21 ± 0.56 |
Groups were compared by One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD Post hoc tests.
Data are shown as Mean ± SD.
p= 0.0221 ins/ins vs. del/del.
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen (2010) (17)
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Semen Volume (mL) | 1.5 (1.4-1.7) |
| Sperm Concentration (106) | 15 (12-16) |
| Sperm Motility (% Total) | 40 (38-42) |
| Sperm Morphology (% normal forms) | 4 (3.0-4.0) |
| Sperm Viability (% viable) | 58 (55-63) |