Literature DB >> 29942532

Single dose of propofol causing propofol infusion syndrome in a newborn.

C Michel-Macías1, D A Morales-Barquet1, A M Reyes-Palomino1, J A Machuca-Vaca1, A Orozco-Guillén1.   

Abstract

Propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) is a rare syndrome originally described in critically ill children undergoing long-term (> 48 h) propofol infusion at high doses (> 4 mg/kg/h). Severe metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, renal failure and fatal cardiac failure are the features. Herein, we present a case of a newborn who developed PRIS after a single bolus dose of propofol at 3.2 mg/kg/do, developing rhabdomyolysis and severe metabolic acidosis, with a successful outcome after medical therapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29942532      PMCID: PMC6007798          DOI: 10.1093/omcr/omy023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oxf Med Case Reports        ISSN: 2053-8855


INTRODUCTION

Propofol related infusion syndrome (PRIS) is a rare syndrome originally described in critically ill children undergoing long-term (> 48 h) propofol infusion at high doses (> 4 mg/kg/h) and is defined as the occurrence of acute bradycardia resistant to treatment and progressing to asystole associated with propofol infusion [1, 2]. Severe metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, renal failure and fatal cardiac failure are other features [2]. It is not clear what the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism is, although the majority of observations point into the direction of interference with the energy production in the mitochondria [3]. Herein we present a case of PRIS described in a newborn who received significantly lower dose of propofol compared to those reported in the literature causing PRIS.

CASE REPORT

A 38.2 weeks gestation, a 3095 g female infant was born by vaginal delivery to a 19-year-old mother. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation was established at 27 weeks. The infant had Apgar scores of 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 min, respectively. On Day 7 of life, an angiotomography was performed confirming prenatal diagnosis of type 2 Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation (CCAM) of the left lung. She was transferred to the NICU for surgical intervention (left superior lung lobectomy), which was performed on Day 12 of life, finding multiple cysts on 3, 4 and 5 segment of the lung. No complications during the procedure were reported. Anesthetic intervention included 25 µg of fentanyl, 10 mg of propofol and 200 µg of vecuronium (total doses). In the immediate postsurgical period, she presented mixed acidosis (pH 6.75 pCO2 68 mmHg, HCO3 11.3 mmol/L, BD 13.4), requiring high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), reaching up to 26 of paw and amplitude of 80 due to hypercarbia up to 107 mmHg. She also presented hemodynamic instability with sudden bradycardia and hypotension, for which atropine 0.01 mg/kg/do and normal saline as volume expander were administered. As hypotension was unresponsive to volume, dopamine was started at a 10 µg/kg/min rate. Hyperkalemia of 8.2 mmol/L was also seen, requiring polarized solution and calcium gluconate due to cardiac toxicity. The patient also showed hyperglycemia (303 mg/dL) for which insulin was started. Uric acid was elevated (6.5 mg/dL) as well as creatine phosphokinase enzyme (768.6 UI/L) and aldolase (24.8 UI/L). Urine dipstick testing showed a positive result for blood (inferring myoglobinuria) and pH of 5. Urine sediment was examined observing renal epithelial cells and the absence of red blood cells. Presumptive diagnosis of PRIS was established. Adequate state of hydration and intravenous bicarbonate was warranted to enhance uric acid excretion. After ~5 h, HFVO was weaned to pressure control ventilation and the patient was finally extubated 36 h later. She showed hemodynamic stability and no further electrolyte derangements were observed over the next few days. At follow up, she remains asymptomatic.

DISCUSSION

Since its description in 1990, PRIS has been reported at lower doses and shorter periods of administration, from 8.8 to 17.5 mg/kg/h for more than 44 h to 2.6 mg/kg/h for 52 h reported by Merz et al. recently in adults [4, 5]. In children, doses as low as 4.8 mg/kg/h have reported to cause PRIS [5]. To our knowledge, this is the first case of PRIS reported in a term newborn after a single bolus of propofol at a dose of 3 mg/kg. Ghanta et al. [6] showed the efficacy and safety of propofol as an induction agent to facilitate neonatal endotracheal intubation with a low dose (2.5 mg/kg) and administered in a single bolus. In our patient there is no other explanation for rhabdomyolysis, bradycardia, hypotension and metabolic acidosis. Despite the fact that the slight elevation of creatine kinase (CK) could be attributed to surgery, other features of rhabdomyolysis present in our patient such as lactate dehydrogenase of 2150 UI/L, symptomatic hyperkalemia of 8.2 mmol/L, myoglobinuria and elevated uric acid can only be attributed to propofol-related bioenergetic failure in skeletal muscle cells [7-9]. Furthermore, there is not a recognizable risk factor for PRIS, as catecholamines were administered after appearance of PRIS. Krajcova et al. observed patterns in the relationship between time and dose of propofol infusion and reported signs of the syndrome; symptoms that could be caused by mitochondrial uncoupling occurred relatively early and after high doses of propofol. On the other hand, signs, which would be consistent with accumulation of nonesterified fatty acids, such as rhabdomyolysis of arrhythmias, occurred after protracted propofol infusions irrespective of doses [9]. Multiple studies indicate that propofol has an effect on the respiratory chain [1-3]. A decrease in mitochondrial transmembrane electrical potential was detected in liver mitochondria isolated from control rats incubated with propofol. The rate of oxygen consumption was increased suggesting that propofol acts as an uncoupler [3]. Kam et al. hypothesized that the inhibitory action of propofol is caused by inhibition of coenxyme Q [2, 10]. In humans, muscle cytochrome oxidase deficiency was demonstrated in a child who received prolonged high-dose propofol infusion without a genetic defect of cytochrome oxidase [2]. Vanlander et al. [3] reported a patient in which the existence of a previous defect in complex I can explain why he was most vulnerable to the administration of propofol. Krajcova et al. [9] demonstrated that 96 h of exposure of human skeletal muscle cells to concentrations of propofol found in plasma of propofol-sedated patients reduced the spare capacity of electron transfer chain and caused a profound inhibition of fatty acid oxidation. The analysis of acylcarnitines has become widely accepted as a helpful instrument to confirm the diagnosis of PRIS. Elevated levels of acylcarnitines indicate the impairment of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation as the probable main cause of this syndrome [11]. Propofol also inhibits protein carnitine palmitoyl transferase I and uncouples the mitochondrial respiratory chain via high levels of C5-acylcarnitine, which has an effect on short chain and medium-chain fatty acids that freely diffuse into the mitochondria, but cannot be utilized [11]. Low carbohydrate supply is a risk factor for PRIS because energy demand is satisfied by lipolysis if carbohydrate supply is low [1, 10]. Children are more prone to the development of PRIS due to low glycogen storage and high dependence on fat metabolism. Fat overload associated with propofol infusion may also contribute to increased plasma fatty acids [1]. Propofol inhibits cardiac beta-adrenoreceptor binding and calcium channel protein function. It suppresses the activity of sympathetic nerves and the baroreceptor reflex, thus deteriorating cardiac failure in PRIS [11]. Large plasmatic increases of CK and myoglobinuria have been documented both in children and adults receiving propofol, and they have been interpreted as proof of a direct necrotizing effect of propofol on peripheral and cardiac muscles [2]. Histological studies showed signs of severe myocytolysis in the skeletal muscle and myocardium of affected patients [2]. Recently, Vollmer et al. reported a fatal case of PRIS, in which electron dense bodies found in association with mitochondria in muscle and liver cells probably correspond to accumulation of free fatty acid and provide direct morphological evidence for the mitochondrial damage in PRIS [12]. Furthermore, Sumi et al. concluded that propofol suppresses mitochondrial function, causes reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and induces a metabolic switch from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis, by targeting mitochondrial complexes I, II and III in vitro. Also, data from their study indicated that predisposition to mitochondrial dysfunction, caused by genetic mutations or the pharmacological suppression of electron transport chain by biguanides promotes propofol-induced cell death and caspase activation; these mechanism constituting the molecular basis of PRIS [13]. In conclusion, in patients who present propofol infusion syndrome at low doses of propofol, a pre-existing defect in the respiratory chain could be present. Care should be taken in the administration of propofol in neonates with risk factors to present PRIS (SIRS, RDS, state of shock, steroid treatment), and an alternative agent for sedation should be considered.
  12 in total

1.  Propofol infusion syndrome--a fatal case at a low infusion rate.

Authors:  Tobias M Merz; Bruno Regli; Hans-Ulrich Rothen; Peter Felleiter
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch; Esteban Poch; Josep M Grau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Possible pathogenic mechanism of propofol infusion syndrome involves coenzyme q.

Authors:  Arnaud Vincent Vanlander; Juergen Guenther Okun; Annick de Jaeger; Joél Smet; Elien De Latter; Boel De Paepe; Georges Dacremont; Birgitte Wuyts; Bert Vanheel; Peter De Paepe; Philippe Germaine Jorens; Niels Van Regenmortel; Rudy Van Coster
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Propofol compared with the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen as induction agents for neonatal endotracheal intubation: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Satish Ghanta; Mohamed E Abdel-Latif; Kei Lui; Hari Ravindranathan; John Awad; Julee Oei
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  A death associated with possible propofol infusion syndrome.

Authors:  Nikhil Agrawal; Sudhakar Rao; Roshan Nair
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Effects of Propofol on Cellular Bioenergetics in Human Skeletal Muscle Cells.

Authors:  Adéla Krajčová; Nils Gunnar Løvsletten; Petr Waldauf; Vladimír Frič; Moustafa Elkalaf; Tomáš Urban; Michal Anděl; Jan Trnka; G Hege Thoresen; František Duška
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  The propofol infusion 'syndrome' in intensive care unit: from pathophysiology to prophylaxis and treatment.

Authors:  V Papaioannou; C Dragoumanis; V Theodorou; I Pneumatikos
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg       Date:  2008

Review 8.  Propofol infusion syndrome: update of clinical manifestation and pathophysiology.

Authors:  A Fudickar; B Bein
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  The pathophysiology of propofol infusion syndrome: a simple name for a complex syndrome.

Authors:  Beatrice Vasile; Frank Rasulo; Andrea Candiani; Nicola Latronico
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Propofol induces a metabolic switch to glycolysis and cell death in a mitochondrial electron transport chain-dependent manner.

Authors:  Chisato Sumi; Akihisa Okamoto; Hiromasa Tanaka; Kenichiro Nishi; Munenori Kusunoki; Tomohiro Shoji; Takeo Uba; Yoshiyuki Matsuo; Takehiko Adachi; Jun-Ichi Hayashi; Keizo Takenaga; Kiichi Hirota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Propofol toxicity in the developing mouse heart mitochondria.

Authors:  Matthew B Barajas; Sarah D Brunner; Aili Wang; Keren K Griffiths; Richard J Levy
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.953

2.  Naringenin Prevents Propofol Induced Neurodegeneration in Neonatal Mice Brain and Long-Term Neurocognitive Impacts on Adults.

Authors:  Lili Zou; Mingliang Ning; Wenjuan Wang; Yuemei Zheng; Liping Ma; Jing Lv
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.162

3.  The effect of adenosine triphosphate on propofol-induced myopathy in rats: a biochemical and histopathological evaluation.

Authors:  Kezban Tuna Ozkaloglu Erdem; Zehra Bedir; Irem Ates; Ufuk Kuyrukluyildiz; Taha Abdulkadir Coban; Gulce Naz Yazici; Yusuf Kemal Arslan; Zeynep Suleyman; Halis Suleyman
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.016

4.  Modeling propofol-induced cardiotoxicity in the isolated-perfused newborn mouse heart.

Authors:  Matthew B Barajas; Aili Wang; Keren K Griffiths; Linlin Sun; Guang Yang; Richard J Levy
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-08

5.  Propofol use in newborns and children: is it safe? A systematic review.

Authors:  Eduardo Mekitarian Filho; Mariana Barbosa Riechelmann
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.990

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.