| Literature DB >> 29942521 |
Jung-Youb Lee1, Jung-Won Kim1, Eun-Jung Kim2, Mi-Young Lee1,3, Chang-Wook Nam4, In-Sung Chung1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The concentration of particulate matter in the air varies depending on the region because it is lightweight and generated from a variety of sources. To assess the relationship between particulate matter and eye disease, this study analyzes the concentration data obtained from spatial analysis of particulate matter and emergency visit data.Entities:
Keywords: Conjunctivitis; Keratitis; PM10; Particulate matter; Spatial analysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29942521 PMCID: PMC5996503 DOI: 10.1186/s40557-018-0252-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Occup Environ Med ISSN: 2052-4374
Fig. 1Location of air monitoring stations in each region
Fig. 2Polyline of Daegu’s contour line
General characteristics of study subjects
| Variables | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Total | 769 (100.0) |
| Conjunctivitis | 191 (24.8) |
| Keratitis | 578 (75.2) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 494 (64.2) |
| Female | 275 (35.8) |
| Age (years) | |
| < 20 | 157 (20.4) |
| 20–40 | 266 (34.6) |
| 40–60 | 268 (34.9) |
| 60–80 | 75 (9.8) |
| ≥ 80 | 3 (0.4) |
| Address (district) | |
| Nam-gu | 26 (3.4) |
| Dalseo-gu | 163 (21.2) |
| Dalsung-goon | 31 (4.0) |
| Dong-gu | 24 (3.1) |
| Book-gu | 205 (26.7) |
| Seo-gu | 236 (30.7) |
| Suseong-gu | 44 (5.7) |
| Joong-gu | 40 (5.2) |
| Total visitors (denominator) | 282,017 |
Monthly average PM10, other air pollutant concentrations from June, 2006 to December, 2014
| Min | Max | Mean | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM10 (μg/m3) | 27 | 86 | 48 | 11.92 |
| SO2 (ppm) | 0.002 | 0.010 | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| NO2 (ppm) | 0.011 | 0.038 | 0.024 | 0.007 |
| O3 (ppm) | 0.009 | 0.046 | 0.024 | 0.009 |
| CO (ppm) | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.133 |
Abbreviations: SD standard deviation
Conjunctivitis or keratitis patients number differences between districts which stand for PM10 top 20% levels and districts which stand for PM10 bottom 20% levels from June, 2006 to December, 2014
| Visit Indexa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | |||
| Conjunctivitis | PM10 top 20% districts | 0.8 | 0.5 | < 0.01 |
| PM10 bottom 20% districts | 0.3 | 0.7 | ||
| Keratitis | PM10 top 20% districts | 2.4 | 0.9 | < 0.05fIn multiple regression |
| PM10 bottom 20% districts | 1.4 | 1.7 | ||
Abbreviations: SD standard deviation
aVisit Index – number of patients with conjunctivitis or keratitis / number of all patients × 1000
Fig. 3Spatial distribution of PM10 concentration and Visit Index of patients with conjunctivitis or keratitis in 2007. Visit Index – number of patients with conjunctivitis or keratitis / number of all patients × 1000
Fig. 4Spatial distribution of PM10 concentration and Visit Index of patients with conjunctivitis or keratitis in 2013. Visit Index – number of patients with conjunctivitis or keratitis / number of all patients × 1000
Fig. 5Dose-response relationship between PM10 concentration and Visit Index of patients with conjunctivitis from January, 2006 to December, 2014. Visit Index – number of patients with conjunctivitis or keratitis / number of all patients × 1000. *: Pearson’s correlation coefficient; **: statistical analysis by Pearson’s correlation analysis
Fig. 6Dose-response relationship between PM10 concentration and Visit Index of patients with keratitis from January, 2006 to December, 2014. Visit Index – number of patients with conjunctivitis or keratitis / number of all patients × 1000. *: Pearson’s correlation coefficient; **: statistical analysis by Pearson’s correlation analysis
Linear regression analysis of the relationship between PM10 concentration and Visit Indexb
| Unadjusted | Adjustedc | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | 95% CI | Coefficient | 95% CI | |
| Conjunctivitis | 0.040a | 0.005–0.074 | 0.044a | 0.001–0.088 |
| Keratitis | 0.089a | 0.016–0.163 | 0.104a | 0.010–0.198 |
Abbreviations: CI confidence interval
ap-value < 0.05
bVisit Index – number of patients with conjuctivitis or keratitis / number of all patients × 1000
cAdjusted for SO2, NO2, O3 and CO