| Literature DB >> 29942443 |
Zahra Hassannejad1,2, Shayan Abdollah Zadegan2, Aida Shakouri-Motlagh3, Mona Mokhatab4, Motahareh Rezvan2, Mahdi Sharif-Alhoseini2, Farhad Shokraneh5, Pouria Moshayedi6, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To reach an evidence-based knowledge in the context of the temporal-spatial pattern of neuronal death and find appropriate time of intervention in order to preserve spared neurons and promote regeneration after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI).Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Necrosis; Neuron; Pathophysiology; Spinal cord injury
Year: 2018 PMID: 29942443 PMCID: PMC6015255 DOI: 10.22038/IJBMS.2018.24239.6052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.699
Figure 1Flowchart of including studies
Characteristics of included studies
| No | Authror and Year | Number of animals in injury/control goup | Methrod | Time of evaluation (post-injury) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender/ strain/ weighrt (g) or age | Methrod/level of injury | Severity of injury | Methrod of evaluation | ||||
| 1 | Andrade 2008 | at least 10/8 | M/ Wistar/ 220–250 | NYU impactor/ T9-T10 | 10 g | Cresyl Violet staining | 7, 30 D |
| 2 | Barron 1988 | 3/3 | F/ Sprague–Dawley /6 W | Transection/ T7 | N.A. | HR&E & TEM | 10 W |
| 3 | Bose 2005 | 9/5 | F/ Sprague–Dawley /7-7.5 monthr-old | NYU impactor/ T8 | 10 g | Retrogade labeling by CTB | 16 W |
| 4 | Chroo 2008 | 10 per goup/ 9 shram | M/ Sprague Dawley/ 347±28 | Contusion/ C4-C5 | 6 mm x 1.1±0.02 mm depthr | IHRC | 3 hr |
| 5 | Conta 2004 | at least 2/5 | F/ Long-Evans /Adult | NYU impactor/ T10 | 10 g | Retrogade labeling by FG | 4, 6 D, 2 W |
| 6 | Dusart 1994 | at least 2/2 | F/ Lewis /4-5 W | Transection/ middle to lower throracic | two-thrirds of thre cord | IHRC | 1, 3, 6, 12 hrr, 1, 2, 4, 8, 15 21 D, 4, 8, 24 W |
| 7 | Eidelberg 1989 | 4/4 | M/ Sprague–Dawley /200-250 & 7 D | Transection/ T8-T10 | N.A. | TEM, HR&E staining, retrogade labeling by HRRP | 24 hrr, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 D |
| 8 | Ek 2010 | 3/ 3 | M/ Sprague-Dawley/ 170–200 | Impactor/ T10 | 2 mm penetration depthr withr thre target velocity of 5 m/sec and dwell time 100 ms | TEM, IHRC, HR&E | 24 hrr, 1, 4, 10 W |
| 9 | Fehrlings 1995 | 25/ 5 control | F/ Wistar/ 220-280 | Compression/ T1 | 2 g, 18 g, 30 g, 50 g, 98 g | Tract tracing by HRRP | 44 D |
| 10 | Feringa 1984 | at least 3/6 | F/ Wistar/ 6 W | Transection/ T7-T8 | N.A. | Retrogade labeling by HRRP | 6, 8, 10, 12 W |
| 11 | Feringa 1985 a | 10/10 | F/ Wistar/ 6 W | Transection/ T9-T10 | N.A. | Cresyl violet staining/ Retrogade labeling by HRRP | 25 W |
| 12 | Feringa 1988 | at least 3/at least 3 | F/ Wistar/ 7-8 W | Transection/ T9 | N.A. | HR&E staining & Retrogade labeling by HRRP | 5, 10, 15, 25, 52 W |
| 13 | Feringa 1987 | at least 2/3 | F/ Wistar/ 7-8 W | Transection/ T9 | N.A. | HR&E staining | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15 W |
| 14 | Feringa1985 b | 8/8 | F/ Wistar/ 6 W | Transection/ T9 | N.A. | Retrogade labeling by HRRP | 1 Y |
| 15 | Feringa 1983 | at least 3/ at least 3 | F/ Wistar/ 6 W | Transection/ T9 | N.A. | Retrogade labeling by HRRP | 5, 10, 25 W |
| 16 | Gossman 2000 | 5 /5 | F/ Sprague–Dawley /200-250 | Weighrt drop / T8 | 10 g | HR&E staining, IHRC | 24 hrr, 4 W |
| 17 | Gossman 2001 | 5 /5 | F/ Sprague–Dawley / 200 –250 | Weighrt drop/ T8 | 10 g | HR&E staining, IHRC, TEM | 15 min, 4, 8, 24 hr |
| 18 | HRains 2003 | 6 / 9 | M/ Sprague–Dawley / 150-175 | Transection/T9 | Complete | TUNEL & retrogade labeling by FG | 1, 2, 3, 4 W |
| 19 | HRoltz 1990 | 6 / 3 | M/ Sprague–Dawley / 330 g-380 | Compression by curved rectangular plate/ T7-8 | 35 g | HR&E, LFB, cresyl violet staining and TEM | 1 hr, 1, 4, 9, 21 D |
| 20 | HRoule 1999 | 3-4 for cell deathr, 36 for retrogade labeling/ N.A. | F/ Sprague–Dawley /225–250 | HRemisection/ C3 | N.A. | Retrogade labeling by TB and BDA | 1, 4. 8, 14 W |
| 21 | HRuang 2007 | 5 for eachr time point/5 for eachr time point | F/ Sprague–Dawley / 230–255 | Compression/ T12 | 50 g | IHRC | 1, 3, 7, 28 D |
| 22 | James 2011 | at least 4 per eachr time point /N.A. | F/ Sprague–Dawley /200–220 | IHR impactor/ T10 | 150 kdyn from 2–4 mm hreighrt | IHRC & TEM | 1 D, 1, 2, 4, 12, 24 W |
| 23 | Kim 2002 | at least 3/4 | F/ Long- Evans/ 220-270 | Weighrt drop/ T9-10 | 10 g | Retrogade labeling by Fast Blue | 5, 6 D, 1 W |
| 24 | Lee 2004 | at least 9 /11 control | M/ Sprague–Dawley/ 300–350 | NYU impactor/ T9-T10 | 10 g | TUNEL & IHRC | 12, 24, 48, 72 hr, 1 W |
| 25 | Li 1996 | 4 /4 control/4 shram | M /N.A./370 | Compression/ T7-T8 | 9 g, 35 g, 50 g for 5 min | TUNEL & IHRC | 4 hr. 1, 4, 9 D |
| 26 | Liu 2003 | at least 3 / at least 3 | F/ Wistar/ 90–105 | Rubrospinal tractotomy/ C2 | N.A. | Retrogade labeling by FB & TEM | 2 D, 1, 2, 4, 10 W |
| 27 | Liu 1997 | at least 4/ N.A. | F/ Long-Evans/ Adult | Weighrt drop/ T8-9 | 10 g | TUNEL | 5 min & 4, 8, 24 hrr, 3, 7, 14, 30 D |
| 28 | Lou 1998 | Total number of 16 | N.A./Sprague- Dawley adult/ 400 | Allen weighrt-drop/ midthroracic | 35 g. 100 mm | HR&E staining & IHRC & TUNEL | 30 min & 4, 8, 12, 24, 72 hr |
| 29 | McBride 1992 | at least 3/ at least 4 | F/ Wistar/ 7 W | Transection/ T9 | N.A. | Retrogade labeling by FG | 10, 20, 52 W |
| 30 | McBride 1990 | at least 7/ at least 8 | F/ Wistar/ 7 W | Transection/ T9 | N.A. | Retrogade labeling by FG | 10, 20 W |
| 31 | McBride 1989 | at least 4/ at least 5 | F/ Wistar/ 7 W | Transection/ T9 | N.A. | Retrogade labeling by FG | 10, 20 W |
| 32 | McBride 1988 | at least 5/ at least 3 | F/ Wistar/ 135-170 | Transection/ T9 | N.A. | Intracerebellar injection of FG or true blue | 5, 10, 20 W |
| 33 | Morino 2003 | at least 5/37 | F/ Wistar/ 250 | Compression/ T11 | 20 g | TUNEL | 24, 48 hr |
| 34 | Naso 1993 | 15/ 6 | F/ Sprague-Dawley/ 250-350 | Contusion/ T8 | 200, 400, 600 g.mm: 5 g weighrt from various hreighrt | Retrogade labeling by FG | 3 D |
| 35 | Nielson 2010 | at least 5 except 3 w survival n=1/ 10 | M/ Sprague-Dawley/ 150–175 & F/ 225–250 | Dorsal funiculus lesion/ T9 & lateral hremisection/ C5 & Contusion/ T9 | 200 or 250 kdyn | Retrogade labeling by BDA | 1, 3 W, 1 Y |
| 36 | Prendergast 1976 | 5 / N.A. | N.A./Neonate (0-3 D) & adult | Midthroracic hremisection | N.A. | Cresyl violet staining | 90-120 D |
| 37 | Qiu, 2001 | 3/ 3 | M/ Sprague-Dawley / 250-260 | Contusion / T8 | 10 g.12.5 mm | Retrogade labeling by FG, Frag-EL Assay, ELISA, IHRC | 3 D |
| 38 | Rosenberg 1997 | 3/ 4 | F/ Sprague–Dawley/ 230-250 | Weighrt drop/ T8 | 10 g | TB staining & TEM | 15 min & 4, 24 hr |
| 39 | Siebert 2010 a | 4/4 | F/ Long-Evans/ 77 D | Weighrt drop/ T9 | 10 g | TUNEL | 3 D, 1, 2, 4 W |
| 40 | Siebert 2010 b | 4/12 | F/ Long-Evans/ 77 D | Weighrt drop/ T9 | 10 g | Microarray, qRT-PCR | 3 D & 1, 2, 5 W |
| 41 | Springer 1999 | 6 / 6 | Rat | NYU impactor/ T10 | 250 g.mm | IHRC | 1 hr |
| 42 | Steencken 2010 | at least 4/4 | F/ Long-Evans/ N.A. | Contusion / T9 | 25 mm | FG tracing | 2, 6, 16 W |
| 43 | Steencken 2011 | at least 3/ at least 2 | F/ Long-Evans/ N.A. | Contusion/ transection/ T9-T10 | 25 mm | FG tracing | 2, 4, 8, 16 W |
| 44 | Threriault 1994 | 5 /7 | F/ Wistar/ 280-350 g | Clip compression/ C8-T1 | 53 g | Tract tracing by HRRP & FG | 4, 8 W |
| 45 | Wang 2000 | at least 4/ at least 3 | F/ Wistar/ 90-105 | Rubrospinal tractotomy/ C2 | N.A. | Anterogade labeling by Dextran, Retrogade Labeling by FB | 8 W |
| 46 | Wang 2002 | 3/ 9 | F/ Wistar/ 100–150 | Unilateral tractotomy/ C2 or T10 | N.A. | Retrogade Labeling by FB, Intracellular Dye Injection of LY | 4, 8 W |
| 47 | Wang 2013 | 10/ 10 | M/ Sprague-Dawley/ N.A. | Contusion/ T10 | 500 g.mm | TUNEL, IHRC, | 12 hr |
| 48 | Yick 1998 | 4/ 4 | F/ Sprague–Dawley/ 200-250 | HRemisection/ C3, T1, or T11 | N.A. | IHRC | 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 D |
| 49 | Yong 1998 | N.A. | F/ Sprague-Dawley/ 300-350 | NYU Impactor/ T9-T10 | 500 g.mm | HR&E, TUNEL, IHRC, TEM | 1, 3, 7, 14, 28 D |
The number of animals in each injury group (i.e., different time or severity of injury) and control/sham group
Abbreviations: N.A.: not applicable; min: minutes; Sce: seconds; hr: hours; D: days; W: weeks; M: months, IHC: immunohistochemistry; TEM: transmission electron microscopy; TB: True Blue; LY: Lucifer yellow; HRP: horseradish peroxidase; FG: Fluoro-Gold; BDA: Biotinylated dextran amines; CTB: Cholera toxin B, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; WGA-HRP: wheat germ agglutinin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase
Figure 2Evidence-based representation of neuronal apoptotic cell death extension after
Figure 3(a) Schematic representation of the course of 4 most studied descending tracts including corticospinal tract (CST), rubrospinal tract (RST), reticulospinal tract (ReST), and vestibulospinal tract (VST). The percent of surviving neurons of (b) corticospinal tract (CST) and (c) rubrospinal tract (RST) following transection injury. The results are categorized based on the evaluation methods including tract tracing by FG, HRP, FB () and cresyl violet staining (+)