Literature DB >> 29942349

Incidence of early postoperative complications requiring surgical revision for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after spinal surgery: a retrospective observational study of 9,310 patients from the German Spine Register.

Juan Manuel Vinas-Rios1, Martin Sanchez-Aguilar2, Fatima Azucena Medina Govea2, Viktor Von Beeg-Moreno3, Frerk Meyer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recurrence rate in lumbar disc herniations (LDH) has been reported between 5 and 25%. There are only few data about this phenomenon that occurs within days of the initial operation. We analyse early recurrent LDH by analysis of data from the German Spine register.
METHODS: Data from patients undergoing disc herniation surgery in the lumbar region were extracted from the German Spine Registry between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2016. Patients with early recurrent LDH within days of initial surgery were separately analysed.
RESULTS: A total of 9310 surgeries for LDH were documented in the German Spine Register. From these patients 115 (1.2%) presented an early recurrent disc surgeries within days of the initial surgery. The mean age was 70 ± 2.50 years. Most affected segment was L4/5 (47 cases, 41%), followed by L3/4 (45 cases, 39%). The most of our patients showed a normal or overweight Body Mass Index. Surgery for early recurrent LDH was associated with a high rate of incidental durotomies (20 cases, 17.6%). In 3 cases (2.6%) therapy with a lumbar drain was necessary.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of early recurrent LDH within days of surgery is 1.2%. Age seems to be an important factor in early recurrent LDH while obesity does not. The data of the German Spine Register seems to have a reliable data collection system that can perform multicentre data analysis. The databases from this Register could be used in the future for various purposes, such as the evaluation of multicentre surgical techniques, results in patients with various surgical procedures and basic research in spine surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disc herniation; Early recurrence; Lumbar spine; Spine Register

Year:  2018        PMID: 29942349      PMCID: PMC5961485          DOI: 10.1186/s13037-018-0157-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Saf Surg        ISSN: 1754-9493


Background

The recurrence rate in lumbar disc herniations (LDH) has been reported to be 5 to 25%. Nowadays there are only few data about this phenomenon that occur within days of the initial operation. The most affected segment is L4/5 [1-3]. On the other hand, there are few data available on the incidence of recurrence while the patient is still in hospital [4, 5]. Currently it is not clear which factors exert an influence on the genesis of this recurrency. Due to the biomechanics of the pathology, advanced age and pre-existing conditions such as overweight and obesity, as well as the localisation of the affected segment could play a role in the pathology [2, 6–8].

Methods

The aim of this study is that with the help of the available data of the German Spine Register (DWG register), the question should be answered, how often an early recurrence can be expected during the inpatient stay after microsurgical Lumbar nucleotomy. From 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2016, 9310 intervertebral disc operations were recorded using the DWG Register. These data were analysed for the occurrence of early recurrence and for any risk factors for this. With regard to all patients with lumbar disc herniation (n = 9310), 115 early recurrences were detected (1.2%).

Results

We found 115 early recurrences (1.2%) in 9310 surgical procedures due to a lumbar disc herniation. The mean age of patients with an early recurrence was 70 ± 2.50 years with 75 women and 50 men. The segment L4 / 5 (n = 47, 41%) was most frequently affected, followed by the segment L3 / 4 (n = 45, 39%) and the segment L5 / S1 (n = 23, 20%). Regarding Body Mass Index (BMI): 4 patients (3.5%) were underweight (< 20 BMI), 45 (39%) were of normal weight (20–25 BMI), 45 (39%) patients were overweight (26–30 BMI), 19 (16.8%) had Grade 1 obesity (31–35 BMI) and 2 (1.7%) had Grade 2 obesity (> 35 BMI). A dura-injury occurred in n = 20 (17.6%), while n = 3 (2.6%) had to be treated with a lumbar drainage system. Of the patients treated for a herniated disc (n = 84, 82%), 18 (17%) experienced an improvement in their symptoms, while none (0.9%) experienced no relief. For a detailed view of the overall results, see Table 1.
Table 1

Demographics and clinical variability of examined patients with recurrent herniated disc after a lumbar disectomy

Early Lumbar Disc Herniation recurrence
Patients115/9310 (1.2%)
 Gender (m/f)50/75
 Age (years) (Median, range)70 ± 2.50
Body Mass Index (BMI)
  < 20 (Underweight)4 (3.5%)
 20–25 (Normal weight)45 (39%)
 26–30 (Overweight)45 (39%)
 31–35 (Obesity grade 1)19 (16.8%)
  > 35 (Obesity grade 2)2 (1.7%)
Affected segment
 L3/L445 (39%)
 L4/L547 (41%)
 L5/S123 (20%)
Intraoperative complications
 Dura-injury20 (17.6%)
Postoperative complications
 CSF Leakage3 (2.6%)
Symptoms relief
 1. Complete84 (82%)
 2. Partial18 (17%)
 3. None1 (0.09%)
Demographics and clinical variability of examined patients with recurrent herniated disc after a lumbar disectomy

Discussion

This analysis of data from the DWG Register from 9310 patients shows an early recurrence rate of 1.2%. The L4 / 5 segment is most frequently affected. Misleadingly, one might come to the premature conclusion that the most frequently affected segment would be L5 / S1 [2], as it represents biomechanically represents the location of maximum lumbar region mobility. Considering our results and the data presented in the literature, it would be useful if spinal biomechanics were more closely examined in terms of the pathogenesis of recurrences in future studies [2]. Due to the loss of elasticity of the tissue, which can create conditions for a primary prolapse, age is a very important factor in the pathogenesis of this pathology [6, 8]. This is also confirmed by the data we obtained in our study. However, obesity may not be a factor in the development of early relapse, as this pathology may not be due to the biomechanics of the L4 / L5 segment, since axial load over the intervertebral space may be of little concern for recurrence [2, 7]. Occasionally, as a result of the enormous compression of the epidural veins in to the spinal canal through the Lumbar Disc Herniation, significant postoperative bleeding with considerable compression of the neural structures as well as an early Lumbar Disc Herniation recurrence may occur after decompression (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

MRI T2 weight from the Lumbar spine. a and b show a massive Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Segment L4/L5 in sagital and axial views. c and d show after 36 h an early recurrent disc herniation with postoperative Bleeding (↑) and compression of the Cauda Equina causing bowel and bladder retention in sagital and axial views

MRI T2 weight from the Lumbar spine. a and b show a massive Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Segment L4/L5 in sagital and axial views. c and d show after 36 h an early recurrent disc herniation with postoperative Bleeding (↑) and compression of the Cauda Equina causing bowel and bladder retention in sagital and axial views Most of our patients experience an improvement of their symptoms in the following days. This could be explained by the preservation of the nerve structures without Wallerian-degeneration and per se lack of pain or neurological deficits with an improvement in symptoms during the days following surgery by this early recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation [9-14]. The main limitation in our study is the retrospective data collection with its inherent bias, typical from this study design, with possible inconsistences in documentation. Furthermore it is not possible to differentiate with the data in the register, whether the cause for this early recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation is remaining intervertebral disc tissue or a true recurrence.

Conclusion

With help from the The German Spine Society Register we found a frequence of 1.2% in early recurrent LDH. Hence the German Spine Society Register seems to have a reliable data collection system that can perform multicentre data analysis. This data supports similar epidemiological studies to come to consistent values. The databases from this Register could be used in the future for various purposes, such as the evaluation of multicentre surgical techniques, results from patients with various surgical procedures and basic research in spinal surgery.
  14 in total

1.  Microdiscectomy for recurrent L5-S1 disc herniation.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Matteo Pejrona; Marco Damilano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Risk Factors for the Recurrent Herniation After Microendoscopic Discectomy.

Authors:  Yuan Yao; Huan Liu; Huiyu Zhang; Honggang Wang; Zhengfeng Zhang; Yangyi Zheng; Yu Tang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Risk factors for unintended durotomy during spine surgery: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Geoff A Baker; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Mark A Konodi; Jens R Chapman; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Inability to prove instability. A critical appraisal of clinical-radiological flexion-extension studies in lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  L Penning; J T Wilmink; H H van Woerden
Journal:  Diagn Imaging Clin Med       Date:  1984

5.  The Aging of the Global Population: The Changing Epidemiology of Disease and Spinal Disorders.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Lindsay Tetreault; Anick Nater; Ted Choma; James Harrop; Tom Mroz; Carlo Santaguida; Justin S Smith
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Factors that influence recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  M E Yaman; A Kazancı; N D Yaman; F Baş; G Ayberk
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.227

7.  Obesity Is an Independent Risk Factor of Early Complications After Revision Spine Surgery.

Authors:  David C Sing; John K Yue; Lionel N Metz; Ethan A Winkler; William R Zhang; Shane Burch; Sigurd H Berven
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Revision Surgery for "Real" Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshihara; Dipal Chatterjee; Carl B Paulino; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: results of repeat laminectomy and discectomy.

Authors:  L Herron
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1994-04

10.  Surgical management of recurrent disc herniations with microdiscectomy and long-term results on life quality: Detailed analysis of 70 cases.

Authors:  Serdal Albayrak; Sait Ozturk; Emre Durdag; Ömer Ayden
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more
  3 in total

1.  Endoscopic removal of nucleus pulposus of intervertebral disc on lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion and the influence on inflammatory factors and immune function.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Changchun Zhang; Kun Zhu; Zhengqi Bao; Pinghui Zhou; Xiaojun Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Disc Herniation, 2021: 5. Prognosis.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Toyoda
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-07-27

3.  Obesity and Spine Surgery: A Qualitative Review About Outcomes and Complications. Is It Time for New Perspectives on Future Researches?

Authors:  Fabio Cofano; Giuseppe Di Perna; Daria Bongiovanni; Vittoria Roscigno; Bianca Maria Baldassarre; Salvatore Petrone; Fulvio Tartara; Diego Garbossa; Marco Bozzaro
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-06-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.