Influence of the 2-methylimidazole/zinc nitrate hexahydrate molar ratio on the synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 crystals at room temperature.

The effect of the 2-methylimidazole (Hmim)/zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn) molar ratio on the physicochemical characteristics of the zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) was investigated. ZIF-8 crystals were synthesized by mixing Hmim with Zn at room temperature without any additives in methanol solution. It was found that Hmim/Zn molar ratio had significant influence on the crystallinity, yield, particle size and porosity of ZIF-8. The samples synthesized at low Hmim/Zn molar ratio showed a cubic shape, whereas at higher Hmim/Zn ratios truncated rhombic dodecahedron or rhombic dodecahedron morphologies were obtained. The particle size is decreased upon increasing the Hmim/Zn molar ratio. Besides, higher Hmim/Zn molar ratio in a certain range resulted in improving crystallinity, yield, surface area and micropore volume of ZIF-8. The ZIF-8 crystals produced at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 8 exhibited the best characteristics. The present work provides new insights in relation to the role of Hmim/Zn molar ratio on the synthesis process of ZIF-8.

Introduction

As a subclass of metal organic frameworks (MOFs), zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) are porous crystals with zeolite-type structure built by metal ions and imidazolate ligands[1]. ZIFs possess the unique properties of high crystallinity, large surface area, exceptional chemical and functional tunability. As a result, ZIFs have gained considerable attention for their potential application in gas storage[2], CO2 capture[3,4], separation[5,6], sensing[7], catalysis[8], drug delivery[9,10] and water treatment[11,12]. Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8), with sodalite (SOD) topology constructed from Zn and Hmim, is one of the most investigated ZIF materials[13-15]. Nowadays, ZIF-8 can be synthesized using a variety of methods including solvothermal method[1], aqueous synthesis at room temperature[16], microwave-assisted method[17,18], vapor-assisted conversion method[19], ultrasonic synthesis[20], electrochemical routines[21], mechanochemical synthesis[22] and reverse microemulsion method[23]. Aqueous synthesis at room temperature has been widely employed owing to its simplicity, short times and energy saving. The properties of ZIF-8 are related to many factors such as reaction time, solvent, zinc salts, molar ratio and additives. Zhu et al.[24] and Venna et al.[25] investigated the influence of reaction time on the crystal growth without any additives in methanol solution. Eugenia et al.[26] explored the effect of the solvent on the synthesis process and on the nanocrystal characteristics of ZIF-8. Schejn et al.[27] reported on the impact of the zinc source on the morphology and size of ZIF-8 in methanol at room temperature. Jian et al.[28] systematically studied the influence of zinc sources, concentration of Hmim, Hmim/Zn molar ratio and water content on the morphology, particle size, and crystallinity of ZIF-8 at room temperature in water solution. However, few studies have been carried out to systematically explore the influence of Hmim/Zn molar ratio on the properties of ZIF-8 without any additives in methanol solution at room temperature.

Herein, ZIF-8 crystals were synthesized by mixing 2-methylimidazole (Hmim) with zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn) at room temperature without any additives in methanol solution. The effect of the Hmim/Zn molar ratio on the properties of ZIF-8 was investigated. A complimentary characterization study, involving X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and N2 adsoprtion-desorption was carried out to investigate the physicochemical characteristics of ZIF-8 samples.

Results and Discussion

XRD analysis

Figure 1 depicts the XRD spectra of the different ZIF-8 samples prepared in the present work by altering the Hmin/Zn ratio (Table 1). The characteristic diffraction peaks of ZIF-8 at 2θ = 7.4°, 10.4°, 12.7°, 14.7°, 16.4°, 18.0°, 22.1°, 24.5°, 26.7° and 29.6°, which corresponded to planes of (011), (002), (112), (022), (013), (222), (114), (233), (134) and (044) respectively, can be clearly seen. The prominent reflections agreed well with previous reports, confirming the typical sodalite structure of ZIF-8[1,27,29]. Clearly, some diffraction peaks of Zn(OH)(NO3)(H2O) and other unkown phases were observed in the XRD patterns of ZIF-8 synthesized at the Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 1. This result was consistent with observations of Kida et al.[16] and Chen et al.[30]. The intensity of diffraction peaks increased with the increasing amount of Hmim, reaching maximum at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 8. The latter indicates that high Hmim/Zn molar ratio are required in order to obtained high crystallinity of ZIF-8.

Figure 1

XRD patterns of the different ZIF-8 samples prepared at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of (A) 1, (B) 2, (C) 4, (D) 8 and (E) 16.

Table 1

Relative crystallinity and yield of ZIF-8 prepared at different Hmim/Zn molar ratio.

Samples	Hmim/Zn molar ratio	Relative crystallinity (%)	Yield (%)
A	1	73.13	25.65
B	2	74.56	32.11
C	4	92.07	40.82
D	8	100	51.09
E	16	75.68	49.46

As shown in Table 1, the relative crystallinity and yield of ZIF-8 gradually increased as the Hmim/Zn molar ratio increased from 1 to 8. For higher Hmin/Zn molar ratios, i.e. 16, a decrease in the relative crystallinity and yield was observed, implying an optimum Hmim/Zn molar ratio equal to 8. This can be attributed to the coverage of particle’s surface by excess Hmim, which hinders particle growth. Similar results have been obtained by Daigo et al.[31].

SEM/EDS analysis

Figure 2 displays the morphology of ZIF-8 at different Hmim/Zn molar ratios and the corresponding elemental mapping. ZIF-8 synthesized at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 1 had a cubic shape, with particles size of 0.4 μm and 0.8 μm. For Hmim/Zn molar ratios higher than 1, all samples exhibit truncated rhombic dodecahedron (B and C) or rhombic dodecahedron (D and E) morphologies. The average particle size gradually decreased from 1 μm to 0.1 μm as Hmim/Zn molar ratio increased from 4 to 16, respectively. A similar trend in relation to the change of ZIF-8 size as a function of Hmim/Zn molar ratio, has been observed in other reports[16,28,32]. Moreover, an excess of Hmim results in particles aggregation as shown in Fig. 2(E). Elemental mapping demonstrated homogeneously distribution of C, Zn and N elements in ZIF-8. The O element may come from the residue of zinc nitrate hexahydrate or the conductive adhesive used in the characterization.

Figure 2

SEM images of the different ZIF-8 samples prepared at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of (A) 1, (B) 2, (C) 4, (D) 8, (E) 16 and elemental mapping of ZIF-8 with Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 8.

Textural analysis

As shown in Fig. 3(a), the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of ZIF-8 samples prepared at different Hmim/Zn molar ratio display typical reversible type I isotherms. The adsorbed nitrogen in all samples at low pressures (P/P0 < 0.08) increased steeply, suggesting the existence of micropores. The results were in line with those reported previously[29,33,34]. Furthermore, the isotherms of ZIF-8 prepared at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 4 and 8 exhibited hysteresis loop near P/P0 = 1, indicating the presence of interparticle mesoporosity and macroporosity between ZIF-8 particles[35], in consistent with SEM results. Indeed, the semi-log plot of nitrogen adsorption isotherms of ZIF-8 showed two steps occurring at 5 × 10−2 and 5 × 10−3 P/P0 (Fig. 3(b)). The first step could be attributed to a reorganization of the nitrogen molecules caused by strong electrostatic interactions with the ZIF framework, while the second step to the gas-induced rotation of the imidazolate linkers upon pressure, i.e. to the gate-opening effect[36]. The increase in uptake going from the first to the second step was 24.8%, 27.4%, 28.6%, 28.7% and 27.1% at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16, respectively. This indicated that Hmim/Zn molar ratio had no significant influence on the gate-opening effect of ZIF-8.

Figure 3

(a) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of the different ZIF-8 samples prepared at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of (A) 1, (B) 2, (C) 4, (D) 8 and (E) 16, (b) logarithmic-scale plot of nitrogen adsorption and (c) corresponding pore size distributions.

The pore size distribution (PSD) determined by the Horvath–Kawazoe method were presented in Fig. 3(c). All the samples displayed the same PSD curves with two main peaks at 0.67 nm and 0.96 nm. Interestingly, the sample with Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 8 possesses the highest micropores at a pore width of 0.67 nm and 0.96 nm, in good agreement with the t-plot micropore volume (Table 2).

Table 2

Porosity properties of ZIF-8 prepared in this study and other references.

Samples	Hmim/Zn molar ratio	Uptake of N2 (i) (cm3/g STP)	Uptake of N2 (ii) (cm3/g STP)	BET surface area (m2/g)	Langmuir surface area (m2/g)	Micropore volumea (cm3/g)
A	1	212	282	880	1295	0.42
B	2	260	358	1097	1613	0.54
C	4	282	395	1228	1897	0.59
D	8	295	414	1268	1943	0.62
E	16	223	306	955	1449	0.45
Reference
[11]	10.8	—	—	1237	—	0.66
[27]	8	—	—	1700 ± 30	—	0.66
[33]	7.9	—	—	1386	—	0.61
[37]	8	—	—	1258	—	0.62

aT-plot method.

Table 2 summurizes the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) parameters, Langmuir surface area and the micropore volume calculated with t-plot method. The maximum BET surface area, Langmuir surface area and micropore volume of 1268 m2/g, 1943 m2/g and 0.62 cm3/g, respectively were obtained for the sample synthesized at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 8. These results are in agreement to the values reported by Dai et al.[11] and Wu et al.[37], but lower than these reported by Schejn et al.[27] and Li et al.[33]. This is mainly due to the different synthesis conditions as well as to the different pre-treatment before N2 adsorption. In the present work, the pre-treatment processes (such as the washing step[38] and the evacuation conditions) may lead to the relatively lower values.

Upon increasing the molar ratio of Hmim/Zn, the BET, Langmuir surface area and micropore volume increased, reaching maximum at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 8. Then the surface area and micropore volume decreased gradually with the increase of Hmim/Zn molar ratio. These results can be interpreted taking into account that low Hmim/Zn molar ratios facilitates the formation of by-products possessing small surface areas[16], whereas at high Hmin/Zn ratios the Hmin excess could lead to the decrease of surface area and micropore volume[29].

FTIR spectroscopy analysis

The FT-IR spectra of ZIF-8 samples prepared at different Hmim/Zn molar ratios are shown in Fig. 4. The main bands at 3455, 3135, 2929, 1635, 1585, 1458, 1425, 1385,1309, 1146, 995, 760, 694 and 426 cm−1 can be seen in all samples. These bands are in consistent with those previously reported by Cravillon et al.[39], Ordonez et al.[40] and Jomekian et al.[41]. The band at 3455 cm−1 might be attributed to the N–H stretching vibration of the residual Hmim and the O–H stretching vibration of water from KBr deliquescence. The peaks at 3135 and 2929 cm−1 were associated with the aromatic and aliphatic C–H asymmetric stretching vibrations, respectively. The band around 1635 cm−1 arose from the C=C stretch mode, while band at 1585 cm−1 corresponded to the C=N stretch vibration. The signals at 1300–1460 cm−1 were for the entire ring stretching, whereas the band at 1146 cm−1 derived from aromatic C–N stretching mode. Similarly, the peaks at 995 and 760 cm−1 could be assigned to C–N bending vibration and C–H bending mode, respectively. The band at 694 cm−1 was due to the ring out-of-plane bending vibration of the Hmim. Interestingly, the Zn–N stretching vibration band at 426 cm−1 was clearly observed, demonstrating the chemical combination of zinc ions with nitrogen atoms of the methylimidazole groups towards the formation of imidazolate[42]. No significant differences on the chemical functional groups of ZIF-8 samples prepared at different Hmim/Zn molar ratio were recorded, signifying the minor role of Hmim/Zn molar ratio on the building units of ZIF-8.

Figure 4

FT-IR spectra of the different ZIF-8 samples prepared at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of (A) 1, (B) 2, (C) 4, (D) 8 and (E) 16.

In conclusion, phase-pure ZIF-8 particles were successfully synthesized from zinc nitrate hexahydrate and 2-methylimidazole in methanol at room temperature without using any additives. The relative crystallinity, yield, particle size and porosity properties were markedly affected by the Hmim/Zn molar ratio in the same reaction time. Zinc hydroxide was detected only at low Hmim/Zn molar ratios, as demonstrated by XRD measurements. The particle’s size in considerably decreased as the Hmim/Zn molar ratio increased. Moreover, higher Hmim/Zn molar ratio resulted in improved crystallinity, yield, surface area and t-plot micropore volume of ZIF-8. The ZIF-8 crystals produced at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 8 exhibited the highest crystallinity, yield (51.09%), surface area (BET: 1268 m2/g, Langmuir: 1943 m2/g) and t-plot micropore volume (0.62 cm3/g). At higher than 8 molar ratios, the Hmim excess inhibited particle growth, bringing out the decrease of crystallinity, surface area, porosity and yield. The present results demonstrate the importance of the Hmim/Zn molar ratio in the crystallization kinetics and evolution of ZIF-8 crystals.

Experimental Methods

Materials

Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, >99.0%) and 2-methylimidazole (Hmim, >98.0%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Methanol (MeOH, >99.5%) was obtained from Guangzhou Jinhuada chemical reagent Co., Ltd. All chemicals were of analytical grade and used without any purification. Deionized water was used throughout this work.

Preparation of ZIF-8

Typically, 1.484 g of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O was first dissolved in 50 mL MeOH, which was labeled as solution A. 3.278 g Hmim was dissolved in 50 mL MeOH, which was labeled as solution B. To examine the effects of the Hmim/Zn molar ratio on the synthesized products, the Hmim/Zn molar ratio was adjusted from 1 to 16 by adjusting the concentration of Hmim at a fixed Zn concentration. The solution B was slowly poured into solution A under stirring at room temperature (25 ± 3 °C). The mixture solution was stirred for 60 min at constant speed of 200 rpm. Then the product was collected from the colloidal dispersion by centrifugation (4000 rpm, 30 min) and washed with MeOH three times. Finally, the obtained products were dried in air for subsequent characterization.

Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’PERT MRD, PANalytic, Holland) was performed using Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 50 mA to determine the crystalline. The 2θ scanning range was 5–35°, the step size was 0.008°(2θ) and the scanning speed was 3°(2θ)/min. The relative crystallinity was determined based on the integrated peak areas of samples at 2θ = 7.4°, 10.4°, 12.7°, 14.7°, 16.4° and 18.0°, and considering 100% crystallinity for the one with the strongest peaks (ZIF-8 prepared at Hmim/Zn molar ratio of 8). The peak areas were quantified using the MDJ Jade software after baseline correction. And the yield was calculated based on the amount of zinc. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, TESCAN VEGAІІ XMUINCN, Czech Republic) in combination with energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, OXFORD INCA) were used to characterize the morphology and particles size. The accelerating voltage and current of electron beam are 21 keV and 0.2 nA respectively. Each sample was coated with a very thin gold using a sputter coater under certain high-vacuum conditions to achieve conductivity and vacuum durability and then put into the SEM chamber. The surface area and adsorption–desorption isotherm measurements were carried out on a Quantachrome Autosorb-iQ gas sorption instrument at 77 K using liquid nitrogen as coolant. The sample was degassed at 150 °C for 3 h under vacuum before the measurements. The textural properties were determined via nitrogen sorption at −196 °C. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra in the range 4000−400 cm−1 were obtained on a Thermo Fisher Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer using the KBr wafer technique.