| Literature DB >> 29941924 |
Maggy T Sikulu-Lord1,2, Gregor J Devine3, Leon E Hugo3, Floyd E Dowell4.
Abstract
To date, no methodology has been described for predicting the age of Aedes albopictus Skuse mosquitoes, commonly known as Asian tiger mosquitoes. In this study, we report the potential of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) technique for characterizing the age of female laboratory reared Ae. albopictus. Using leave-one-out cross-validation analysis on a training set, laboratory reared mosquitoes preserved in RNAlater for up to a month were assessed at 1, 3, 7, 9, 13, 16, 20 and 25 days post emergence. Mosquitoes (N = 322) were differentiated into two age classes (< or ≥ 7 days) with 93% accuracy, into three age classes (<7, 7-13 and >13 days old) with 76% accuracy, and on a continuous age scale to within ±3 days of their actual average age. Similarly, models predicted mosquitoes (N = 146) excluded from the training model with 94% and 71% accuracy to the two and the three age groups, respectively. We show for the first time that NIRS, with an improved spectrometer and fibre configuration, can be used to predict the age of laboratory reared female Ae. albopictus. Characterization of the age of Ae. albopictus populations is crucial for determining the efficacy of vector control interventions that target their survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29941924 PMCID: PMC6018420 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27998-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Typical average spectra of 1 d, 13 d and 25 d old female Ae. albopictus collected from their heads and thoraces.
Figure 2Regression coefficient plots with 10 factors for age prediction of female Ae. albopictus mosquitoes on a continuous age scale (Panel A), prediction into two age groups (Panel B) and prediction into three age groups (Panel C).
Percent predictive accuracy of NIRS for determining the age of female Ae. albopictus into specific age groups.
| % Predictive accuracy per age group | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample set |
| 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 16 | 20 | 25 |
|
| Training set | <7, ≥7 | 87.5 | 85 | 95 | 90 | 97.5 | 97.5 | 97.5 | 100 | 93.5 |
| <7, 7–13, >13 | 70 | 72.5 | 85 | 90 | 72.5 | 75 | 50 | 85 | 76 | |
| Validation set | <7, ≥7 | 89 | 100 | 83 | 80 | 95 | 100 | 93 | 100 | 94.5 |
| >7, 7–13 > 13 | 78 | 90 | 67 | 80 | 77 | 50 | 28 | 64 | 70.5 | |
Figure 3The accuracy of NIRS for predicting female Ae. albopictus as < or ≥7 d days old age groups for training and validation data sets. The horizontal dotted line indicates the cut off point for correct prediction whereas the vertical dotted line separates <7 days from ≥7 days old mosquitoes.
The mean age of Ae. albopictus in the training and validation sets as predicted by NIRS. Mean predicted age followed by the same letter are not statistically significant at P < 0.05 when using Tukey post hoc test Actual and mean predicted ages shown are in days.
| Actual age | Training set (N = 322) | Validation set | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean predicted age [95% CI] | SD | Mean predicted age [95% CI] | SD | |
| 1 | 4.3a [3.0–5.6] | 4.1 | 2.8a [0.6–5.0] | 2.8 |
| 3 | 3.7a [2.4–4.9] | 3.9 | 0.3a [−1.8–2.5] | 3.3 |
| 7 | 9.9b [8.8–10.9] | 3.3 | 8.5b [5.2–11.6] | 5.0 |
| 9 | 10.6b [9.1–12.0] | 4.4 | 10.8b,c [7.3–14] | 2.7 |
| 13 | 14.6c [13.4–15.7] | 3.5 | 12.3c [11.3–13.3] | 3.8 |
| 16 | 16.3c [15.3–17.2] | 3.0 | 15.6c [12.7–18.5] | 3.4 |
| 20 | 15.5c [14.4–16.5] | 3.3 | 13.7c [11.7–15.4] | 3.2 |
| 25 | 19.1d [18.0–20.1] | 3.3 | 17.2c [15.3–19.1] | 4.5 |
Figure 4Mean age prediction of female Ae. albopictus using the training and validation sets. Error bars indicate standard deviation and the blue dotted lines indicates the 7 day cut off point that differentiates <7 from ≥7 days old mosquitoes.