Literature DB >> 29941466

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin-Based Strategies for the Assessment of Chest Pain Patients-A Review of Validation and Clinical Implementation Studies.

Kai M Eggers1, Tomas Jernberg2, Lina Ljung3, Bertil Lindahl4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays has improved the early assessment of chest pain patients. A number of hs-cTn-based algorithms and accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) have been developed and tested subsequently. In this review, we summarize the data on the performance and clinical utility of these strategies. CONTENT: We reviewed studies investigating the diagnostic and prognostic performance of hs-cTn algorithms [level of detection (LoD) strategy, 0/1-h, 0/2-h, and 0/3-h algorithms) and of hs-cTn-based ADPs, together with the implications of these strategies when implemented as clinical routine. The LoD strategy, when combined with a nonischemic electrocardiogram, is best suited for safe rule-out of myocardial infarction and the identification of patients eligible for early discharge from the emergency department. The 0/1-h algorithms appear to identify most patients as being eligible for rule-out. The hs-cTn-based ADPs mainly focus on prognostic assessment, which is in contrast with the hs-cTn algorithms. They identify smaller proportions of rule-out patients, but there is increasing evidence from prospective studies on their successful clinical implementation. Such information is currently lacking for hs-cTn algorithms.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a trade-off between safety and efficacy for different hs-cTn-based strategies. This trade-off should be considered for the intended strategy, along with its user-friendliness and evidence from clinical implementation studies. However, several gaps in knowledge remain. At present, we suggest the use of an ADP in conjunction with serial hs-cTn results to optimize the early assessment of chest pain patients.
© 2018 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29941466     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.287342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  5 in total

1.  Using the clinical chemistry score in the emergency department to detect adverse cardiac events: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Peter A Kavsak; Joshua O Cerasuolo; Dennis T Ko; Jinhui Ma; Jonathan Sherbino; Shawn E Mondoux; Natasha Clayton; Stephen A Hill; Matthew McQueen; Lauren E Griffith; Shamir R Mehta; Richard Perez; Hsien Seow; P J Devereaux; Andrew Worster
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-11-02

2.  Comparison of ADVIA Centaur ultra-sensitive and high-sensitive assays for troponin I in serum.

Authors:  Joško Osredkar; Teja Fabjan; Kristina Kumer; Jure Tršan; Laura Poljančič; Miha Košir; Pia Vovk; Nada Snoj; Petra Finderle; Hugon Možina
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2022-07-12

3.  Increasingly Sensitive Troponin Assays: Is Perfect the Enemy of Good?

Authors:  Cian P McCarthy; James L Januzzi
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Risk Stratification for Patients with Chest Pain Discharged Home from the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Peter A Kavsak; Joshua O Cerasuolo; Shawn E Mondoux; Jonathan Sherbino; Jinhui Ma; Brock K Hoard; Richard Perez; Hsien Seow; Dennis T Ko; Andrew Worster
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Evangelos Giannitsis; Stefan Blankenberg; Robert H Christenson; Norbert Frey; Stephan von Haehling; Christian W Hamm; Kenji Inoue; Hugo A Katus; Chien-Chang Lee; James McCord; Martin Möckel; Jack Tan Wei Chieh; Marco Tubaro; Kai C Wollert; Kurt Huber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.460

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.