Literature DB >> 29941301

Laparoscopic stomach intestinal pylorus-sparing surgery as a revisional option after failed adjustable gastric banding: a report of 27 cases with 36-month follow-up.

Amit Surve1, Hinali Zaveri1, Daniel Cottam2, Austin Cottam1, Samuel Cottam1, LeGrand Belnap1, Walter Medlin1, Christina Richards1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inadequate weight loss, weight recidivism, and device-related complications after an adjustable gastric banding (AGB) can be treated by a laparoscopic conversion to stomach intestinal pylorus-sparing surgery (SIPS).
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the midterm outcomes of revision SIPS surgery after failed AGB.
SETTING: Private practice, United States.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of our prospectively collected data of patients who underwent laparoscopic conversion from AGB to SIPS surgery from June 2013 and February 2017 by a single surgeon in a single institution.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (1 stage: 22 and 2 stage: 5) underwent a laparoscopic revision of AGB to SIPS surgery. The mean ± standard deviation preoperative body mass index (BMI) before AGB was 47.5 ± 6.8 kg/m2, while the mean nadir BMI after AGB was 36 ± 7.7 kg/m2. The overall time to reoperation was 9.3 ± 8.7 and 5.6 ± 2.5 years in 1- and 2-stage conversion patients, respectively. The mean preoperative BMI before revision SIPS surgery was 46.7 ± 7 kg/m2. At 36 months, the patients had an average change in BMI of 20.9 units with 90% excess weight loss. A major complication occurred in 4 patients. Postoperatively, the fasting blood glucose, insulin, low-density lipoprotein, triglyceride, and most of the co-morbidities were resolved or improved.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that conversion of failed AGB to SIPS surgery is an effective approach to AGB failure.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric; Failed adjustable gastric banding; Revision; SIPS surgery; Stomach intestinal pylorus-sparing surgery; Weight regain

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29941301     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  3 in total

1.  Early Outcomes of Primary SADI-S: an Australian Experience.

Authors:  Amit Surve; Ravi Rao; Daniel Cottam; Aditya Rao; Leila Ide; Samuel Cottam; Benjamin Horsley
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Robotic vs laparoscopic approach for single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Pennestrì; Luca Sessa; Francesca Prioli; Pierpaolo Gallucci; Luigi Ciccoritti; Francesco Greco; Carmela De Crea; Marco Raffaelli
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-09-25

3.  Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): experience from a high-bariatric volume center.

Authors:  Francesco Pennestrì; Luca Sessa; Francesca Prioli; Giulia Salvi; Pierpaolo Gallucci; Luigi Ciccoritti; Francesco Greco; Carmela De Crea; Marco Raffaelli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.895

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.