Literature DB >> 29941215

Effects of Non-thermal, Non-cavitational Ultrasound Exposure on Human Diabetic Ulcer Healing and Inflammatory Gene Expression in a Pilot Study.

Anamika Bajpai1, Sumati Nadkarni1, Michael Neidrauer1, Michael S Weingarten2, Peter A Lewin1, Kara L Spiller3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this clinical study was to assess, in a limited patient population, the potential for a novel advanced wound care treatment based on low-frequency (20 kHz) low-intensity (spatial peak temporal peak intensity <100 mW/cm2; i.e., pressure amplitude of 55 kPa) ultrasound (LFLI-US), to affect wound closure rate in human diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and to effect changes in the relative expression of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory genes. The ratio of expression of these genes, termed the M1/M2 score because it was inspired by the transition of macrophages from pro-inflammatory (M1) to anti-inflammatory (M2) phenotypes as wound healing progresses, was previously presented as a potential healing indicator for DFUs treated with the standard of care. We previously found that non-cavitational, non-thermal LFLI-US delivered with a pulse repetition frequency of 25 Hz was effective at improving wound healing in a pilot study of 20 patients with chronic venous ulcers. In this study, we assessed the potential for weekly LFLI-US exposures to affect wound healing in patients with diabetic ulcers, and we analyzed temporal changes in the M1/M2 score in debrided diabetic wound tissue. Although this was a limited patient population of only 8 patients, wounds treated with LFLI-US exhibited a significantly faster reduction in wound size compared with sham-treated patients (p < 0.001). In addition, the value of the M1/M2 score decreased for all healing diabetic ulcers and increased for all non-healing diabetic ulcers, suggesting that the M1/M2 score could be useful as an indicator of treatment efficacy for advanced DFU treatments. Such an indicator would facilitate clinical decision making, ensuring optimal wound management and thus contributing to reduction of health care expenses. Moreover, the results presented may contribute to an understanding of the mechanisms underlying ultrasonically assisted chronic wound healing. Knowledge of these mechanisms could lead to personalized or patient-tailored treatment.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetic ulcers; Inflammation; Low-frequency; low-intensity ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29941215      PMCID: PMC6105501          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  31 in total

1.  Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial.

Authors:  Peter Sheehan; Peter Jones; Antonella Caselli; John M Giurini; Aristidis Veves
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ulcers.

Authors:  David L Steed; Christopher Attinger; Theodore Colaizzi; Mary Crossland; Michael Franz; Lawrence Harkless; Andrew Johnson; Hans Moosa; Martin Robson; Thomas Serena; Peter Sheehan; Aristidis Veves; Laurel Wiersma-Bryant
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Macrophage differentiation and polarization via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt-ERK signaling pathway conferred by serum amyloid P component.

Authors:  Weijuan Zhang; Wei Xu; Sidong Xiong
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  Dressings for chronic wounds.

Authors:  Jennifer Gloeckner Powers; Laurel M Morton; Tania J Phillips
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.851

5.  Dysregulation of monocyte/macrophage phenotype in wounds of diabetic mice.

Authors:  Rita Mirza; Timothy J Koh
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.861

6.  The use of bioelectric dressings in skin graft harvest sites: a prospective case series.

Authors:  Andrew L Blount; Sarah Foster; Derek A Rapp; Richard Wilcox
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.845

7.  Early healing rates and wound area measurements are reliable predictors of later complete wound closure.

Authors:  Matthew Cardinal; David E Eisenbud; Tania Phillips; Keith Harding
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 8.  The burden of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  G E Reiber; B A Lipsky; G W Gibbons
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Diffuse near-infrared spectroscopy prediction of healing in diabetic foot ulcers: a human study and cost analysis.

Authors:  Michael S Weingarten; Joshua A Samuels; Michael Neidrauer; Xiang Mao; David Diaz; James McGuire; Jane McDaniel; Lori Jenkins; Leonid Zubkov; Elisabeth S Papazoglou
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  VenUS IV (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV) - compression hosiery compared with compression bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial, mixed-treatment comparison and decision-analytic model.

Authors:  Rebecca L Ashby; Rhian Gabe; Shehzad Ali; Pedro Saramago; Ling-Hsiang Chuang; Una Adderley; J Martin Bland; Nicky A Cullum; Jo C Dumville; Cynthia P Iglesias; Arthur R Kang'ombe; Marta O Soares; Nikki C Stubbs; David J Torgerson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of silver foam combined with Dermlin wound healing dressing on inflammation and quality of life in patients with diabetic lower limb ulcers.

Authors:  Yuanling Xu; Yongsheng Li; Kangmin Yu; Zhiyong Chen; Yun Shen; Binshan Zha; Hong Zhang; Qianqian Xu; Hong Zhao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Time- and Dose-Dependent Effects of Pulsed Ultrasound on Dermal Repair in Diabetic Mice.

Authors:  Melinda A Vander Horst; Carol H Raeman; Diane Dalecki; Denise C Hocking
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Modulation of inflammation in wounds of diabetic patients treated with porcine urinary bladder matrix.

Authors:  John T Paige; Michael Kremer; Jace Landry; Samuel A Hatfield; Donald Wathieu; Aaron Brug; Daniel J Lightell; Kara L Spiller; T Cooper Woods
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  The role of rehabilitation in the management of diabetic foot wounds.

Authors:  Elif Aydın; Mustafa Bülent Ertuğrul
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 5.  Ultrasound-Assisted Wound (UAW) Debridement in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sebastián Flores-Escobar; Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso; Yolanda García-Álvarez; Mateo López-Moral; José Luis Lázaro-Martínez; Esther García-Morales
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  The Role of Leukocytes in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Anamika Bajpai; Douglas G Tilley
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.