| Literature DB >> 29940348 |
Bintao Zhai1, Qingli Niu2, Zhijie Liu3, Jifei Yang4, Yuping Pan1, Youquan Li1, Hongxi Zhao5, Jianxun Luo6, Hong Yin7.
Abstract
Comprehensive epidemiological surveys for Lyme disease have not been conducted for the Bactrian camel in China. In this study, a total of 138 blood specimens collected from Bactrian camels from Zhangye City in Gansu Province and Yili and Aksu in Xinjiang Province, China, were examined for the presence of Borrelia spp. Species-specificity nested PCR based on the 5S-23S rRNA, OspA, flaB and 16S rRNA genes revealed that the total positive rate of Borrelia spp. was 3.6% (5/138, 95% CI = 0.2-17.9). These results were confirmed by sequence analysis of the positive PCR products or positive colonies. This is the first report of Borrelia pathogens in camels in China. Two Borrelia species that cause Lyme disease and one that causes relapsing fever were identified in the camel blood samples by sequencing. The findings of this study indicate that the Bactrian camel may serve as a potential natural host of Lyme disease and/or relapsing fever in China.Entities:
Keywords: Bactrian camel; Borrelia spp.; Nested PCR
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29940348 PMCID: PMC7106200 DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.06.028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Genet Evol ISSN: 1567-1348 Impact factor: 3.342
Fig. 1Bactrian camel blood specimens were harvested in Northwest China (Gansu (Zhangye) and Xinjiang (Ili and Aksu)).
Sequences of the primers used in this study.
| Primer | Nucleotide sequence (5′-3′) | Annealing temperature (°C) | Amplicon size | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16S | OuterF | GCGAACGGGTGAGTAACG | 50 | 1360 | |
| OuterR | CCTCCCTTACGGGTTAGAA | ||||
| InnerF | GAGGCGAAGGCGAACTTCTG | 60.2 | 622 | ||
| InnerR | CTAGCGATTCCAACTTCATGAAG | ||||
| 5S–23S | 5S rRNA (rrf) | CGACCTTCTTCGCCTTAAAGC | 57.6 | 412 | |
| 23S rRNA (rrl) | TAAGCTGACTAATACTAATTACCC | ||||
| 5S rRNA (rrf)IN | CTGCGAGTTCGCGGGAGA | 57.3 | 253 | ||
| 23S rRNA (rrl)IN | TCCTAGGCATTCACCATA | ||||
| OspA | N1 | GAGCTTAAAGGAACTTCTGATAA | 52.5 | 561 | |
| CI | GTATTGTTGTACTGTAATTGT | ||||
| N2 | ATGGATCTGGAGTACTTGAA | 53 | 352 | ||
| C2 | CTTAAAGTAACAGTTCCTTCT | ||||
| FlaB | OuterF | TGGTATGGGAGTTTCTGG | 53.3 | 774 | |
| OuterR | TCTGTCATTGTAGCATCTTT | ||||
| InnerF | CAGACAACAGAGGGAAAT | 54.7 | 604 | ||
| InnerR | TCAAGTCTATTTTGGAAAGCACC |
Prevalence of Borrelia spp. in camel blood samples from two Provinces in China assessed by the nested-PCRs.
| Province | City | 16S | 5S–23S | At least one gene | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gansu | Zhangye | 46 | 0 (0) | 2 (4.3, 0.2–19.6) | 0 (0) | 2 (4.3, 0.2–19.6) | 1(2.2, 0.1–13.8) |
| Xinjiang | Aksu | 43 | 5 (11.6, 3.2–36.8) | 2 (4.7, 0.2–19.8) | 2 (4.7, 0.2–19.8) | 0 (0) | 4 (9.3, 2.1–28.9) |
| Ili | 49 | 3 (6.1, 1.3–20.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Total | 138 | 8 (5.8, 1.1–17.2) | 4 (2.9, 0.1–16.3) | 2 (1.4, 0.1–10.6) | 2 (1.4, 0.1–10.6) | 5 (3.6, 0.2–17.9) |
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of Borrelia species obtained in the present study and those deposited in GenBank from different countries; accession numbers are shown after isolate names. The 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained in this study are indicated by bold triangles. The tree was inferred using the neighbour-joining method of MEGA 6.06; bootstrap values are shown at each branch point. Numbers above the branch reflect bootstrap support from 500 replications. All sites of the alignment containing insertions-deletions or missing data were eliminated from the analysis (option “complete deletion”).
Fig. 3Phylogenetic tree of the 5S-23S rRNA gene sequences of Borrelia species obtained in the present study and those deposited in GenBank from different countries; accession numbers are shown after isolate names. The 5S-23S rRNA gene sequences obtained in this study are indicated by bold triangles. The tree was inferred using the neighbour-joining method of MEGA 6.06; bootstrap values are shown at each branch point. Numbers above the branch reflect bootstrap support from 500 replications. All sites of the alignment containing insertions-deletions or missing data were eliminated from the analysis (option “complete deletion”).
Fig. 4Phylogenetic tree of the flaB gene sequences of Borrelia species obtained in the present study and those deposited in GenBank from different countries; accession numbers are shown after isolate names. The flaB gene sequences obtained in this study are indicated by bold triangles. The tree was inferred using the neighbour-joining method of MEGA 6.06; bootstrap values are shown at each branch point. Numbers above the branch reflect bootstrap support from 500 replications. All sites of the alignment containing insertions-deletions or missing data were eliminated from the analysis (option “complete deletion”).
Fig. 5Phylogenetic tree of the OspA gene sequences of Borrelia species obtained in the present study and those deposited in GenBank from different countries; accession numbers are shown after isolate names. The OspA gene sequences obtained in this study are indicated by bold triangles. The tree was inferred using the neighbour-joining method of MEGA 6.06; bootstrap values are shown at each branch point. Numbers above the branch reflect bootstrap support from 500 replications. All sites of the alignment containing insertions-deletions or missing data were eliminated from the analysis (option “complete deletion”).