Marla E Eisenberg1, Amy L Gower1, Barbara J McMorris2, G Nicole Rider3, Eli Coleman3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2. School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. Program in Human Sexuality, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Understanding the root causes of the substantial disparities in risk and protective factors among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adolescents is essential to the development and expansion of resources and supports for this vulnerable population. This study examines differences in emotional distress, bullying victimization, and protective factors among TGD high school students in city, suburban, town, and rural locations. METHODS: Data come from a statewide school-based survey conducted in Minnesota in 2016 (n = 2,168 TGD youth). Analysis of covariance models were used to predict the prevalence of multiple indicators of emotional distress, bullying victimization, and protective factors across the 4 location categories, with multiple adjustments. FINDINGS: Significant linear trends were observed for 2 emotional distress outcomes and 2 bullying victimization outcomes, with urban TGD students having the lowest rates and rural having the highest prevalences. Additional significant differences in emotional distress were noted, with unexpectedly high rates of depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation among suburban students. CONCLUSIONS: Helping TGD adolescents in all types of locations identify resources and supportive professionals is critical to supporting this population.
PURPOSE: Understanding the root causes of the substantial disparities in risk and protective factors among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adolescents is essential to the development and expansion of resources and supports for this vulnerable population. This study examines differences in emotional distress, bullying victimization, and protective factors among TGD high school students in city, suburban, town, and rural locations. METHODS: Data come from a statewide school-based survey conducted in Minnesota in 2016 (n = 2,168 TGD youth). Analysis of covariance models were used to predict the prevalence of multiple indicators of emotional distress, bullying victimization, and protective factors across the 4 location categories, with multiple adjustments. FINDINGS: Significant linear trends were observed for 2 emotional distress outcomes and 2 bullying victimization outcomes, with urban TGD students having the lowest rates and rural having the highest prevalences. Additional significant differences in emotional distress were noted, with unexpectedly high rates of depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation among suburban students. CONCLUSIONS: Helping TGD adolescents in all types of locations identify resources and supportive professionals is critical to supporting this population.
Authors: Elle Lett; Matthew P Abrams; Emery Moberg; G Perusi Benson; Jacob E Perlson Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2022-08-13 Impact factor: 4.519
Authors: A Jess Williams; Christopher Jones; Jon Arcelus; Ellen Townsend; Aikaterini Lazaridou; Maria Michail Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Janis Renner; Wiebke Blaszcyk; Lars Täuber; Arne Dekker; Peer Briken; Timo O Nieder Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 5.555