| Literature DB >> 29940055 |
Yanzi Zhang, Zhen Tan, Ren Liao, Zongke Zhou, Pengde Kang, Xu Cheng, Kun Huang, Jing Yang, Bin Shen, Fuxing Pei, Xiao Wang, Jing Yang.
Abstract
In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study, the authors compared the analgesic efficacy of the single-shot adductor canal block (SS-ACB) vs the continuous adductor canal block (C-ACB) with intermittent boluses during the 72-hour postoperative period. Seventy-five patients randomly received the following: a single shot of 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine preoperatively followed by intermittent saline boluses at 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively (SS-ACB group); 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine preoperatively and 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively (C-ACB group); or saline preoperatively and postoperatively (control group). The primary outcome was visual analog scale pain scores with movement on postoperative day 1. The dynamic pain scores of the 2 ACB groups were equivalent and were lower than those of the control group on postoperative day 1. Compared with the control group, the 2 ACB groups were less likely to use opioids on the operative day and the first 2 postoperative days. The patients in the control group and the C-ACB group exhibited less quadriceps muscle strength than those in the SS-ACB group on postoperative day 1. The time required for an SS-ACB was markedly shorter than that required for an indwelling adductor canal catheter. Further, each adductor canal catheter cost $80. Patients who received a single block reported more satisfaction with their pain-relief treatment. Given the similar analgesic effect but better quadriceps muscle strength, easier execution, and higher patient satisfaction, the SS-ACB may be more suitable for total knee arthroplasty patients than the C-ACB. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e607-e614.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29940055 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20180621-05
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthopedics ISSN: 0147-7447 Impact factor: 1.390