Literature DB >> 29940055

The Prolonged Analgesic Efficacy of an Ultrasound-Guided Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Yanzi Zhang, Zhen Tan, Ren Liao, Zongke Zhou, Pengde Kang, Xu Cheng, Kun Huang, Jing Yang, Bin Shen, Fuxing Pei, Xiao Wang, Jing Yang.   

Abstract

In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study, the authors compared the analgesic efficacy of the single-shot adductor canal block (SS-ACB) vs the continuous adductor canal block (C-ACB) with intermittent boluses during the 72-hour postoperative period. Seventy-five patients randomly received the following: a single shot of 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine preoperatively followed by intermittent saline boluses at 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively (SS-ACB group); 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine preoperatively and 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively (C-ACB group); or saline preoperatively and postoperatively (control group). The primary outcome was visual analog scale pain scores with movement on postoperative day 1. The dynamic pain scores of the 2 ACB groups were equivalent and were lower than those of the control group on postoperative day 1. Compared with the control group, the 2 ACB groups were less likely to use opioids on the operative day and the first 2 postoperative days. The patients in the control group and the C-ACB group exhibited less quadriceps muscle strength than those in the SS-ACB group on postoperative day 1. The time required for an SS-ACB was markedly shorter than that required for an indwelling adductor canal catheter. Further, each adductor canal catheter cost $80. Patients who received a single block reported more satisfaction with their pain-relief treatment. Given the similar analgesic effect but better quadriceps muscle strength, easier execution, and higher patient satisfaction, the SS-ACB may be more suitable for total knee arthroplasty patients than the C-ACB. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e607-e614.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29940055     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20180621-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  4 in total

1.  Early Postoperative Pain Control and Inflammation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Comparison of Continuous Adductor Canal Block versus Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block Combined with Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Yang; Jun Dong; Wei Xiong; Fusen Huang
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Is continuous catheter adductor canal block better than single-shot canal adductor canal block in primary total knee arthroplasty?: A GRADE analysis of the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changjiao Sun; Xiaofei Zhang; Fei Song; Zhe Zhao; Ruiyong Du; Sha Wu; Qi Ma; Xu Cai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Continuous adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty provides a better analgesia compared to single shot: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Umut Canbek; Ulas Akgun; Nevres Hurriyet Aydogan; Cem Yalin Kilinc; Ali Ihsan Uysal
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  Continuous adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with the single-shot adductor canal block?: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Rongguo Yu; Haiyang Wang; Youguang Zhuo; Dongxin Liu; Chunling Wu; Yiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.