Literature DB >> 29939857

The regularity of orthosis use and the reasons for disuse in stroke patients.

Güldal F Nakipoğlu Yüzer1, Engin Koyuncu, Pinar Çam, Neşe Özgirgin.   

Abstract

This is a Retrospective descriptive study. Orthoses and walking aids are used frequently in stroke rehabilitation to facilitate ambulation. The aim was to describe the regularity of orthosis use and the reasons for disuse in stroke after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. The study included 64 (43 men, 21 women) subacute stroke patients who had been discharged from our clinic in the last 6 months. Demographic and clinical findings, proposed orthoses and walking aids, frequency of usage for the proposed orthoses, reasons for disuse, and the ambulation levels were recorded. A total of 54 (84.4%) patients had an ankle-foot orthosis and 10 (15.6%) patients had a knee-ankle-foot orthosis. The orthosis frequency of use was every day in 38 (59.4%) patients and one to seven times a week in seven (10.9%) patients, whereas 19 (29.7%) did not use them. The reasons for orthosis disuse were finding them unnecessary in seven (27%) patients, usage difficulties in six (23%) patients, pressure sensation in five (19.2%) patients, the belief that they did not make life easier in five (19.2%) patients, lack of a suitable environment in one (3.8%) patient, orthosis wear in one (3.8%) patient, and systemic disease in one (3.8%) patient. Age, sex, residence, the disease duration, and recommended orthosis duration (how long the prescribed orthosis was used), recommended orthosis, range of motion limitation in the lower extremities, presence of spasticity, type of orthosis, and the ambulation level were not statistically significantly associated with the frequency of orthosis use (P>0.05). The only significant clinical factor for the frequency of orthosis use was the lower extremity Brunnstrom neurophysiological recovery stage (P<0.008). Orthosis use had been discontinued by 29% of the patients. The most common reasons reported for discontinuing orthosis use were that the patients found it unnecessary, usage difficulty, pressure sensation, not making life easier, lack of a suitable environment, and orthosis wear. The only significant clinical factor for the frequency of orthosis use was the lower extremity Brunnstrom neurophysiological recovery stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29939857     DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res        ISSN: 0342-5282            Impact factor:   1.479


  4 in total

Review 1.  Patient Compliance With Wearing Lower Limb Assistive Devices: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ayisha Z Bashir; Danae M Dinkel; Iraklis I Pipinos; Jason M Johanning; Sara A Myers
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.300

2.  Efficacy of Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Functional Mobility and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

Authors:  Eiji Kobayashi; Kenta Hiratsuka; Hirokazu Haruna; Nobue Kojima; Nobuaki Himuro
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The effect of ankle-foot orthoses on fall/near fall incidence in patients with (sub-)acute stroke: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Corien D M Nikamp; Marte S H Hobbelink; Job van der Palen; Hermie J Hermens; Johan S Rietman; Jaap H Buurke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Usefulness of the QR Code in Orthotic Applications after Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Jaeho Cho; Gi-Won Seo; Jeong Seok Lee; Hyung Ki Cho; Eun Myeong Kang; Jahyung Kim; Dong-Il Chun; Young Yi; Sung Hun Won
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.