Literature DB >> 29939422

Long-term effects and recovery of streams from acid mine drainage and evaluation of toxic metal threshold ranges for macroinvertebrate community reassembly.

David B Herbst1, R Bruce Medhurst1, Ned J P Black2.   

Abstract

Monitoring of benthic invertebrates in streams receiving acidic metal-contaminated water over an 18-yr period revealed both degraded conditions and recovery along a network of downstream locations. Compared with reference streams, and over the course of clean-up remediation efforts below an abandoned open-pit sulfur mine in the central Sierra Nevada of California, improving water quality was accompanied by recovery of benthic communities at some sites. Years of high flow resulted in degraded biological status when acid mine drainage capture was incomplete and metal loading had increased with runoff. Seasonal patterns of recovery evident in the fall after the summer treatment season reverted in the next spring after overwinter periods when sources were not captured. As the metal load has been reduced, phased recovery of community structure, function, and similarity progressed toward that of reference assemblage taxonomic composition. From impacted communities dominated by relatively tolerant midges, reassembly involved an increase in density, return of long-lived taxa, an increased ratio of sensitive-to-tolerant forms, then overall diversity and community composition, and eventually large predators and grazers reappearing along with mayfly, stonefly, and caddisfly richness. Threshold effect levels defined using several analysis methods showed that the response range of biological indicators corresponds to US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines of predicted effects utilizing cumulative criterion units (CCUs) of metal toxicity (i.e., CCU ∼ 1). All sites have shown improved function with increased density of some or all trophic groups over time. Although recovery is progressing, year-around treatment may be necessary to fully restore biological integrity in streams nearest the mine. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:2575-2592.
© 2018 SETAC. © 2018 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid mine drainage; Benthic macroinvertebrates; Biomonitoring; Cumulative criterion units; Dose-response modeling; Ecotoxicology; Headwater streams; Leviathan mine; Metal toxicity; Mine effluents; Sierra Nevada; Superfund site

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29939422      PMCID: PMC6837168          DOI: 10.1002/etc.4217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  12 in total

1.  Modification of an ecotoxicological rating to bioassess small acid mine drainage-impacted watersheds exclusive of benthic macroinvertebrate analysis.

Authors:  Travis S Schmidt; David J Soucek; Donald S Cherry
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils.

Authors:  M H Wong
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Relationships among exceedences of metals criteria, the results of ambient bioassays, and community metrics in mining-impacted streams.

Authors:  Michael B Griffith; James M Lazorchak; Alan T Herlihy
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Anthropogenic and natural sources of acidity and metals and their influence on the structure of stream food webs.

Authors:  Kristy L Hogsden; Jon S Harding
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 5.  Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review.

Authors:  D Barrie Johnson; Kevin B Hallberg
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Four reasons why traditional metal toxicity testing with aquatic insects is irrelevant.

Authors:  Monica D Poteat; David B Buchwalter
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Influence of remediation in a mine-impacted river: metal trends over large spatial and temporal scales.

Authors:  Michelle I Hornberger; Samuel N Luoma; Michael L Johnson; Marcel Holyoak
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Long-term chemical and biological improvement in an acid mine drainage-impacted watershed.

Authors:  Bruce E Underwood; Natalie A Kruse; Jennifer R Bowman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Development of a new toxic-unit model for the bioassessment of metals in streams.

Authors:  Travis S Schmidt; William H Clements; Katharine A Mitchell; Stanley E Church; Richard B Wanty; David L Fey; Philip L Verplanck; Carma A San Juan
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Aquatic insect ecophysiological traits reveal phylogenetically based differences in dissolved cadmium susceptibility.

Authors:  David B Buchwalter; Daniel J Cain; Caitrin A Martin; Lingtian Xie; Samuel N Luoma; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Before-After Control-Impact field surveys and novel experimental approaches provide valuable insights for characterizing stream recovery from acid mine drainage.

Authors:  Christopher J Kotalik; Pete Cadmus; William H Clements
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 10.753

2.  Size-Dependent Sensitivity of Aquatic Insects to Metals.

Authors:  Pete Cadmus; Christopher J Kotalik; Abbie L Jefferson; Samuel H Wheeler; Amy E McMahon; William H Clements
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 9.028

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.