Literature DB >> 29939038

Cohort effects in children's delay of gratification.

Stephanie M Carlson1, Yuichi Shoda2, Ozlem Ayduk3, Lawrence Aber4, Catherine Schaefer5, Anita Sethi6, Nicole Wilson2, Philip K Peake7, Walter Mischel8.   

Abstract

In the 1960s at Stanford University's Bing Preschool, children were given the option of taking an immediate, smaller reward or receiving a delayed, larger reward by waiting until the experimenter returned. Since then, the "Marshmallow Test" has been used in numerous studies to assess delay of gratification. Yet, no prior study has compared the performance of children across the decades. Common wisdom suggests children today would wait less long, preferring immediate gratification. Study 1 confirmed this intuition in a survey of adults in the United States (N = 354; Mdn age = 34 years). To test the validity of this prediction, Study 2 analyzed the original data for average delay-of-gratification times (out of 10 min) of 840 typically developing U.S. children in three birth cohorts from similar middle-high socioeconomic backgrounds in the late 1960s, 1980s, and 2000s, matched on age (3 to 5 years) at the time of testing. In contrast to popular belief, results revealed a linear increase in delay over time (p < .0001, ηp2 = .047), such that children in the 2000s waited on average 2 min longer than children in the 1960s, and 1 min longer than children in the 1980s. This pattern was robust with respect to age, sex, geography and sampling effects. We posit that increases in symbolic thought, technology, preschool education, and public attention to executive function skills have contributed to this finding, but caution that more research in diverse populations is needed to examine the generality of the findings and to identify causal factors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29939038     DOI: 10.1037/dev0000533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  4 in total

1.  The Digital Marshmallow Test (DMT) Diagnostic and Monitoring Mobile Health App for Impulsive Behavior: Development and Validation Study.

Authors:  Michael Sobolev; Rachel Vitale; Hongyi Wen; James Kizer; Robert Leeman; J P Pollak; Amit Baumel; Nehal P Vadhan; Deborah Estrin; Frederick Muench
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.773

2.  Synaptic dysfunction of Aldh1a1 neurons in the ventral tegmental area causes impulsive behaviors.

Authors:  Xinyan Li; Wenting Chen; Xian Huang; Wei Jing; Tongmei Zhang; Quntao Yu; Hongyan Yu; Hao Li; Qing Tian; Yumei Ding; Youming Lu
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 14.195

3.  Developmentally informed behaviour change techniques to enhance self-regulation in a health promotion context: a conceptual review.

Authors:  Alison L Miller; Sharon L Lo; Katherine W Bauer; Emily M Fredericks
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-27

4.  Children of Smoking and Non-Smoking Households' Perceptions of Physical Activity, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Exercise.

Authors:  Melissa Parnell; Ivan Gee; Lawrence Foweather; Greg Whyte; Zoe Knowles
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.