Literature DB >> 29938882

Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition.

Peter B Adler1, Danielle Smull1, Karen H Beard1, Ryan T Choi1, Tucker Furniss1, Andrew Kulmatiski1, Joan M Meiners2, Andrew T Tredennick1, Kari E Veblen1.   

Abstract

Theory predicts that intraspecific competition should be stronger than interspecific competition for any pair of stably coexisting species, yet previous literature reviews found little support for this pattern. We screened over 5400 publications and identified 39 studies that quantified phenomenological intraspecific and interspecific interactions in terrestrial plant communities. Of the 67% of species pairs in which both intra- and interspecific effects were negative (competitive), intraspecific competition was, on average, four to five-fold stronger than interspecific competition. Of the remaining pairs, 93% featured intraspecific competition and interspecific facilitation, a situation that stabilises coexistence. The difference between intra- and interspecific effects tended to be larger in observational than experimental data sets, in field than greenhouse studies, and in studies that quantified population growth over the full life cycle rather than single fitness components. Our results imply that processes promoting stable coexistence at local scales are common and consequential across terrestrial plant communities.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords:  Biodiversity; Lotka-Volterra; competition coefficient; forests; grasslands; meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29938882     DOI: 10.1111/ele.13098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  20 in total

1.  Soil-microorganism-mediated invasional meltdown in plants.

Authors:  Zhijie Zhang; Yanjie Liu; Caroline Brunel; Mark van Kleunen
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Conspecific and heterospecific grass litter effects on seedling emergence and growth in ragwort (Jacobaea vulgaris).

Authors:  Henrike Möhler; Tim Diekötter; Geeltje Marie Bauer; Tobias W Donath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Exploring physiological traits for measuring response to competition in durum wheat.

Authors:  L Henry; Jb Morel; L Buendia
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2019-11-18

4.  Frequency-dependent fitness and reproductive dynamics contribute to habitat segregation in sympatric jewelflowers.

Authors:  Kyle Christie; Sharon Y Strauss
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Wildlife disturbances as a source of conspecific negative density-dependent mortality in tropical trees.

Authors:  Matthew Scott Luskin; Daniel J Johnson; Kalan Ickes; Tze Leong Yao; Stuart J Davies
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Understanding the emergence of contingent and deterministic exclusion in multispecies communities.

Authors:  Chuliang Song; Lawrence H Uricchio; Erin A Mordecai; Serguei Saavedra
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 11.274

7.  Positive density dependence acting on mortality can help maintain species-rich communities.

Authors:  Thomas G Aubier
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Contrasting population manipulations reveal resource competition between two large marsupials: bare-nosed wombats and eastern grey kangaroos.

Authors:  Julie Tamura; Janeane Ingram; Alynn M Martin; Christopher P Burridge; Scott Carver
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Evidence for competition and cannibalism in wormlions.

Authors:  Inon Scharf; May Hershkovitz Reshef; Bar Avidov; Ofer Ovadia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Induced plasticity alters responses to conspecific interactions in seedlings of a perennial grass.

Authors:  Alicia J Foxx
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.