| Literature DB >> 29938497 |
Alexis Marsol-Vall1, Maaria Kortesniemi1, Saila T Karhu2, Heikki Kallio1, Baoru Yang1.
Abstract
The volatile profiles of three blackcurrant ( Ribes nigrum L.) cultivars grown in Finland and their responses to growth latitude and weather conditions were studied over an 8 year period by headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) followed by gas-chromatographic-mass-spectrometric (GC-MS) analysis. Monoterpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated monoterpenes were the major classes of volatiles. The cultivar 'Melalahti' presented lower contents of volatiles compared with 'Ola' and 'Mortti', which showed very similar compositions. Higher contents of volatiles were found in berries cultivated at the higher latitude (66° 34' N) than in those from the southern location (60° 23' N). Among the meteorological variables, radiation and temperature during the last month before harvest were negatively linked with the volatile content. Storage time had a negative impact on the amount of blackcurrant volatiles.Entities:
Keywords: HS-SPME-GC-MS; Ribes nigrum; blackcurrant; cultivar; latitude; meteorological data; volatile compounds; weather conditions
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29938497 PMCID: PMC6221373 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02070
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Agric Food Chem ISSN: 0021-8561 Impact factor: 5.279
Volatiles Detected by HS-SPME-GC-MS Profiling of the Blackcurrant Samples
| peak no. | compound | code | RICal | RILit | quantification ion ( | identification criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esters | ||||||
| methyl 2-methylbutanoate | E1 | 793 | 780 | 88 | MS, RI | |
| ethyl butanoate | E2 | 808 | 805 | 88 | MS, RI | |
| ethyl isovalerate | E3 | 860 | 858 | 88 | MS, RI | |
| methyl benzoate | E4 | 1102 | 1102 | 105 | STD | |
| Aldehydes | ||||||
| hexanal | Ad1 | 804 | 800 | 82 | STD | |
| nonanal | Ad2 | 1108 | 1102 | 98 | STD | |
| Alkanes | ||||||
| undecane | H1 | 1100 | 1100 | 156 | STD | |
| Internal Standards | ||||||
| IS1 | 900 | 900 | 128 | |||
| neryl acetate | IS2 | 1369 | 1362 | 121 | ||
| Nonoxygenated Monoterpenes | ||||||
| α-thujene | MT1 | 926 | 930 | 93 | MS, RI | |
| α-pinene | MT2 | 931 | 939 | 93 | STD | |
| camphene | MT3 | 946 | 953 | 93 | STD | |
| verbenene | MT4 | 970 | 968 | 119 | MS, RI | |
| β-pinene | MT5 | 975 | 979 | 93 | STD | |
| myrcene | MT6 | 993 | 991 | 93 | STD | |
| pseudo-limonene | MT7 | 1001 | 1004 | 93 | MS, RI | |
| α-phellandrene | MT8 | 1006 | 1003 | 93 | STD | |
| δ-3-carene | MT9 | 1010 | 1010 | 93 | STD | |
| α-terpinene | MT10 | 1017 | 1017 | 121 | STD | |
| MT11 | 1022 | 1020 | 119 | MS, RI | ||
| MT12 | 1025 | 1026 | 119 | STD | ||
| limonene | MT13 | 1028 | 1029 | 93 | STD | |
| MT14 | 1039 | 1040 | 93 | STD | ||
| MT15 | 1050 | 1050 | 93 | STD | ||
| terpenoid (MW = 136) | MT16 | 1057 | — | 93 | MS | |
| γ-terpinene | MT17 | 1064 | 1060 | 93 | STD | |
| terpinolene | MT18 | 1089 | 1089 | 136 | STD | |
| Oxygenated Monoterpenes | ||||||
| eucalyptol | OMT1 | 1034 | 1031 | 154 | STD | |
| OMT2 | 1112 | 1108 | 139 | MS, RI | ||
| campholenal | OMT3 | 1132 | 1126 | 108 | MS, RI | |
| borneol | OMT4 | 1162 | 1169 | 95 | MS, RI | |
| pinocarvone | OMT5 | 1169 | 1164 | 108 | MS, RI | |
| terpinen-4-ol | OMT6 | 1183 | 1182 | 136 | STD | |
| OMT7 | 1188 | 1183 | 135 | MS, RI | ||
| OMT8 | 1193 | 1200 | 135 | MS, RI | ||
| α-terpineol | OMT9 | 1198 | 1192 | 136 | MS, RI | |
| myrtenol | OMT10 | 1200 | 1196 | 107 | MS, RI | |
| cumaldehyde | OMT11 | 1248 | 1242 | 133 | MS, RI | |
| bornyl acetate | OMT12 | 1290 | 1289 | 136 | STD | |
| terpinen-4-ol acetate | OMT13 | 1338 | 1340 | 93 | MS, RI | |
| terpinyl acetate | OMT14 | 1355 | 1350 | 121 | STD | |
| citronellyl acetate | OMT15 | 1358 | 1353 | 123 | MS, RI | |
| Sesquiterpenes | ||||||
| β-caryophyllene | ST1 | 1422 | 1419 | 133 | STD | |
| α-caryophyllene | ST2 | 1456 | 1455 | 93 | MS, RI | |
Retention indices (RI) calculated according to the Van den Dool and Kratz equation.[41]
RI from the literature.
Tentatively identified by comparison of the mass-spectral (MS) and retention-index (RI) data with those from databases.
Identified on the basis of comparison of the GC and mass spectra with those of the reference compounds.
In the cultivar ‘Melalahti’, β-pinene coelutes with sabinene.
Weather Variables and the Corresponding Abbreviations Used in the Study
| abbreviation | weather variable | abbreviation | weather variable |
|---|---|---|---|
| ∑ | temperature sum over 5 °C in the growth season (°C) | DHu20to30gh | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 20–30% from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (%) |
| ∑ | temperature sum over 5 °C in the last month of the growth season (°C) | DHu30to40gh | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 30–40% from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (%) |
| HDgh | hot days (temperature >25 °C) from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (days) | DHu40to50gh | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 40–50% from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (%) |
| HDmon | hot days (temperature >25 °C) in the last month before harvest (days) | DHu50to60gh | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 50–60% from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (%) |
| average temperature in the last month before harvest | DHu60to70gh | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 60–70% from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (%) | |
| average temperature in the last week before harvest (°C) | DHu70to80gh | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 70–80% from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (%) | |
| Δ | mean daily temperature difference in the last month | DHu80to90gh | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 80–90% from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (%) |
| MinTmon | minimum temperature of the last month | DHu90to100gh | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 90–100% from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (%) |
| LoTmon | lowest daily temperature average of the last month | DHu<70gh | percentage of the days with relative humidity below 70% from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (%) |
| MaxTmon | highest temperature of the last month | DHu>70gh | percentage of the days with relative humidity above 70% from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest (%) |
| HiTmon | highest daily average temperature of the last month | DHu20to30m | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 20–30% in the last month before harvest (%) |
| ∑ | radiation sum from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest | DHu30to40m | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 30–40% in the last month before harvest (%) |
| ∑ | radiation sum from the start of the last month until the day of harvest | DHu40to50m | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 40–50% in the last month before harvest (%) |
| ∑ | radiation sum from the start of the last week until the day of harvest | DHu50to60m | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 50–60% in the last month before harvest (%) |
| Pregh | precipitation sum from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest | DHu60to70m | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 60–70% in the last month before harvest (%) |
| Premon | precipitation sum from the start of the last month until the day of harvest | DHu70to80m | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 70–80% in the last month before harvest (%) |
| PreW | precipitation sum from the start of the last week until the day of harvest | DHu80to90m | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 80–90% in the last month before harvest (%) |
| Hugh | average humidity from the start of the growth season until the day of harvest | DHu90to100m | percentage of the days with relative humidity of 90–100% in the last month before harvest (%) |
| Humon | average humidity for the last month before harvest | ||
| Huw | average humidity for the last week before harvest |
Figure 1PCA of blackcurrant samples. (A) Scores plot of ‘Melalahti’ (blue squares), ‘Mortti’ (red circles), and ‘Ola’ (black triangles); 1, 2, 3, and 4: samples collected from field blocks 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively; S: southern Finland (Piikkiö); N: northern Finland (Apukka); 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, and 17: samples collected in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016, and 2017, respectively. (B) Loadings plot. Compounds are coded according to Table .
Figure 2Volatile contents in respect to storage time. (A) Total volatiles, (B) nonoxygenated monoterpenes, and (C) oxygenated monoterpenes for ‘Melalahti’ (squares), ‘Mortti’ (circles), and ‘Ola’ (triangles) grown in the North (red) and South (blue).
Figure 3PLS-DA of ‘Mortti’ and ‘Ola’ cultivars showing (A) ‘Mortti’ scores plot, (B) ‘Mortti’ loadings plot, (C) ‘Ola’ scores plot, and (D) ‘Ola’ loadings plot for samples grown in Apukka (N, red circles) and Piikkiö (S, black triangles).
Figure 4Composition of 2017 samples expressed as means (μg·kg–1) of fresh weight. Error bars indicate standard deviations (n = 3).
Figure 5(A) PLS-DA model biplot of ‘Mortti’ and ‘Ola’ samples grown in Apukka (N, red circles) and Piikkiö (S, black triangles). (B) Expanded areas circled in Figure A. The compounds are coded according to Table . The weather variable abbreviations are represented according to Table .