Literature DB >> 29938270

Artificial sweetener saccharin disrupts intestinal epithelial cells' barrier function in vitro.

P S Santos1, C R P Caria, E M F Gotardo, M L Ribeiro, J Pedrazzoli, A Gambero.   

Abstract

SCOPE: Consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) is a dietary practice used by those who wish to lose weight or by patients on a sugar-restricted diet such as those with DM2. Although these substances are safe, possible biological interactions with the digestive tract, particularly in relation to intestinal permeability, have not been studied. Thus, the current work sought to investigate the action of different NNS on intestinal permeability using an in vitro Caco-2 cell model. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Caco-2 cells were incubated with acesulfame K, aspartame, saccharin, or sucralose at equimolar concentrations. Acesulfame K, aspartame, and sucralose did not disrupt monolayer integrity in the cells. However, saccharin increased paracellular permeability and decreased transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) via a non-cytotoxic mechanism. The levels of the tight junction protein claudin-1 were reduced in Caco-2 cells that had previously been exposed to saccharin. The inhibition of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) was able to prevent the reduction in TEER induced by saccharin treatment. Thalidomide, as an inhibitor of ubiquitin ligase, was able to prevent the decrease in claudin-1 protein expression and the TEER reduction in Caco-2 cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Saccharin disrupts monolayer integrity and alters paracellular permeability in a Caco-2 cell monolayer model, via a mechanism involving NF-κB activation, resulting in the ubiquitination of the tight junction protein claudin-1. Saccharin consumption may potentially alter the intestinal integrity in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29938270     DOI: 10.1039/c8fo00883c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Funct        ISSN: 2042-6496            Impact factor:   5.396


  14 in total

1.  High-dose saccharin supplementation does not induce gut microbiota changes or glucose intolerance in healthy humans and mice.

Authors:  Joan Serrano; Kathleen R Smith; Audra L Crouch; Vandana Sharma; Fanchao Yi; Veronika Vargova; Traci E LaMoia; Lydia M Dupont; Vanida Serna; Fenfen Tang; Laisa Gomes-Dias; Joshua J Blakeslee; Emmanuel Hatzakis; Scott N Peterson; Matthew Anderson; Richard E Pratley; George A Kyriazis
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 14.650

2.  Artificial Sweeteners Disrupt Tight Junctions and Barrier Function in the Intestinal Epithelium through Activation of the Sweet Taste Receptor, T1R3.

Authors:  Aparna Shil; Oluwatobi Olusanya; Zaynub Ghufoor; Benjamin Forson; Joanne Marks; Havovi Chichger
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 3.  Plausible Biological Interactions of Low- and Non-Calorie Sweeteners with the Intestinal Microbiota: An Update of Recent Studies.

Authors:  Julio Plaza-Diaz; Belén Pastor-Villaescusa; Ascensión Rueda-Robles; Francisco Abadia-Molina; Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ojeda
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 4.  The Impact of Artificial Sweeteners on Body Weight Control and Glucose Homeostasis.

Authors:  Michelle D Pang; Gijs H Goossens; Ellen E Blaak
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 5.  Low-calorie sweeteners in the human diet: scientific evidence, recommendations, challenges and future needs. A symposium report from the FENS 2019 conference.

Authors:  Alison M Gallagher; Margaret Ashwell; Jason C G Halford; Charlotte A Hardman; Niamh G Maloney; Anne Raben
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2021-01-25

6.  Artificial Sweeteners Negatively Regulate Pathogenic Characteristics of Two Model Gut Bacteria, E. coli and E. faecalis.

Authors:  Aparna Shil; Havovi Chichger
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Metabarcoding reveals that a non-nutritive sweetener and sucrose yield similar gut microbiota patterns in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Tiago Falcon; Kelly Carraro Foletto; Marina Siebert; Denise Entrudo Pinto; Michael Andrades; Marcello Casaccia Bertoluci
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 1.771

8.  Effects of dietary sweeteners supplementation on growth performance, serum biochemicals, and jejunal physiological functions of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Jingle Jiang; Siyi Liu; Tuniyaz Jamal; Tengxin Ding; Lina Qi; Zengpeng Lv; Debing Yu; Fangxiong Shi
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Food Additives, a Key Environmental Factor in the Development of IBD through Gut Dysbiosis.

Authors:  Pauline Raoul; Marco Cintoni; Marta Palombaro; Luisa Basso; Emanuele Rinninella; Antonio Gasbarrini; Maria Cristina Mele
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-13

10.  A Versatile Human Intestinal Organoid-Derived Epithelial Monolayer Model for the Study of Enteric Pathogens.

Authors:  Stefania Senger; Christina S Faherty; Kourtney P Nickerson; Alejandro Llanos-Chea; Laura Ingano; Gloria Serena; Alba Miranda-Ribera; Meryl Perlman; Rosiane Lima; Marcelo B Sztein; Alessio Fasano
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.