| Literature DB >> 29938192 |
Huan-Huan Gao1, Yanna Sun1, Xiangjian Wan1, Xin Ke1, Huanran Feng1, Bin Kan1, Yanbo Wang1, Yamin Zhang1, Chenxi Li1, Yongsheng Chen1.
Abstract
A new acceptor-donor-acceptor (A-D-A) type nonfullerene acceptor, 3TT-FIC, which has three fused thieno[3,2-b]thiophene as the central core and difluoro substituted indanone as the end groups, is designed and synthesized. 3TT-FIC exhibits broad and strong absorption with extended onset absorption to 995 nm and a low optical bandgap of 1.25 eV. The binary device based on 3TT-FIC and the polymer PTB7-Th exhibits a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 12.21% with a high short circuit current density ( Jsc) of 25.89 mA cm-2. To fine-tune the morphology and make full use of the visible region sunlight, phenyl-C71-butyricacid-methyl ester (PC71BM) is used as the third component to fabricate ternary devices. In contrast to the binary devices, the ternary blend organic solar cells show significantly enhanced EQE ranging from 300 to 700 nm and thus an improved Jsc with a high value of 27.73 mA cm-2. A high PCE with a value of 13.54% is achieved for the ternary devices, which is one of the highest efficiencies in single junction organic solar cells reported to date. The results provide valuable insight for the ternary devices in which the external quantum efficiency (EQE) induced by the third component is evidently observed and directly contributed to the enhancement of the device efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: nonfullerene acceptors; organic solar cells; ternary blends
Year: 2018 PMID: 29938192 PMCID: PMC6010751 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201800307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Chemical structures of a) 3TT‐FIC nonfullerene acceptor and b) PTB7‐Th donor, c) UV–Vis absorption spectra of PTB7‐Th, PC, and 3TT‐FIC in neat film, d) the device structure.
Photophysical and electrochemical parameters of 3TT‐FIC
| Comp. | λmax sol [nm] | λmax film [nm] | λonset
film [nm] |
| HOMO [eV] | LUMO [eV] | εmax (M−1 cm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 799 | 851 | 995 | 1.25 | −5.42 | −4.17 | 2.1 × 105 |
E g opt = 1240/λonset (eV).
Figure 2a) Current density–voltage (J–V) curves of PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC based binary device and PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PC based ternary device under one sun illumination (AM 1.5 G 100 mW cm−2). b) EQE spectra of the corresponding devices. c) J ph versus V eff and d) light‐intensity (P) dependence of J sc measurement of the devices.
The photovoltaic data of the optimized devices based on PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC and PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PC under the illumination of AM 1.5G (100 mW cm−2)
| Comp. |
| FF |
| PCE [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:1.2:0 | 0.662 | 0.712 | 25.89 | 12.21 (11.96 ± 0.25) |
| 1:1.2:0.15 | 0.666 | 0.719 | 27.36 | 13.10 (12.79 ± 0.31) |
| 1:1.2:0.30 | 0.669 | 0.730 | 27.73 | 13.54 (13.33 ± 0.21) |
| 1:1.2:0.45 | 0.671 | 0.690 | 27.29 | 12.63 (12.28 ± 0.35) |
The PCE values were calculated from 20 devices for each case.
Figure 3AFM images for a) PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC blend film and b) PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PC71BM blend film. TEM images for c) TB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC blend film and d) PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PCBM blend film.
Figure 42D GIXD images of the a) binary and b) ternary blend films. c) The out‐of‐plane (black line) and in‐plane (red line) line‐cut profiles.