Literature DB >> 29938192

A New Nonfullerene Acceptor with Near Infrared Absorption for High Performance Ternary-Blend Organic Solar Cells with Efficiency over 13.

Huan-Huan Gao1, Yanna Sun1, Xiangjian Wan1, Xin Ke1, Huanran Feng1, Bin Kan1, Yanbo Wang1, Yamin Zhang1, Chenxi Li1, Yongsheng Chen1.   

Abstract

A new acceptor-donor-acceptor (A-D-A) type nonfullerene acceptor, 3TT-FIC, which has three fused thieno[3,2-b]thiophene as the central core and difluoro substituted indanone as the end groups, is designed and synthesized. 3TT-FIC exhibits broad and strong absorption with extended onset absorption to 995 nm and a low optical bandgap of 1.25 eV. The binary device based on 3TT-FIC and the polymer PTB7-Th exhibits a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 12.21% with a high short circuit current density (   Jsc) of 25.89 mA cm-2. To fine-tune the morphology and make full use of the visible region sunlight, phenyl-C71-butyricacid-methyl ester (PC71BM) is used as the third component to fabricate ternary devices. In contrast to the binary devices, the ternary blend organic solar cells show significantly enhanced EQE ranging from 300 to 700 nm and thus an improved  Jsc with a high value of 27.73 mA cm-2. A high PCE with a value of 13.54% is achieved for the ternary devices, which is one of the highest efficiencies in single junction organic solar cells reported to date. The results provide valuable insight for the ternary devices in which the external quantum efficiency (EQE) induced by the third component is evidently observed and directly contributed to the enhancement of the device efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nonfullerene acceptors; organic solar cells; ternary blends

Year:  2018        PMID: 29938192      PMCID: PMC6010751          DOI: 10.1002/advs.201800307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)        ISSN: 2198-3844            Impact factor:   16.806


In the past decades, organic solar cells (OSCs) have drawn extensive attentions due to their advantages such as low cost and large area printing production, flexibility, semitransparency, etc.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Presently, OSCs in labs have made significant progress with power conversion efficiency (PCE) over 13% for single junction devices,7 mainly due to new active materials development and device optimizations.8, 9, 10, 11 Despite the great success for the fullerene‐based OSCs in earlier years,12, 13, 14 the dominated acceptor materials, fullerene derivatives, have some intrinsic drawbacks such as weak absorption, poor chemical and electronic adjustability, etc., limiting the further improvement of the photovoltaic performance. To address those issues and further improve OSCs efficiencies, great attentions have been paid to develop nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs) with wide and tunnable absorption windows, easily tuned energy levels.15, 16, 17 In just recent years, NFAs‐based OSCs have made significant progress with breakthrough PCEs over 13% for single junction devices.7 On the other hand, besides exploring the device optimization methods such as thermal and solvent annealing, additive, etc., the device structures such as tandem18, 19, 20 and ternary devices21, 22, 23, 24 have also been explored intensively in order to further improve the performance. In contrast to the complicated fabrication process of tandem structure OSCs, ternary devices with three components (two donors with one acceptor or one donor with two acceptors) have a simpler process to fabricate devices. Furthermore, it can also take the advantage of tandem devices with enhanced photon harvesting by incorporating the third component.25, 26, 27, 28, 29 In ternary devices, the additional component usually exhibits complementary absorption with the binary materials. Also it needs to have suitable energy levels to offer enough driving forces for exciton dissociation and charge extraction.21, 30 This is because such a cascade energy structure would bridge the donor and acceptor energy offset and facilitate exciton dissociation and then improve the open‐circuit voltage (V oc).25, 31, 32 In recent years, great progress has been made for the ternary OSCs, including new materials design, morphology optimization, and mechanism understanding.30, 33 Just recently, PCEs over 14% have been reported by Ding and co‐workers22 with a ternary device using a low band gap NFA acceptor, demonstrating great potential of ternary devices. Recently, our34 and other groups2, 35 have almost simultaneously reported an A–D–A NFA TTIC with a broad and near infrared absorption ranging from 600 to 900 nm in the thin film. PCE of 10.87% was achieved when polymer PBDB‐T was used as the donor material in our case.34 In this work, based on the above molecule TTIC, we designed and synthesized a new NFA molecule 3TT‐FIC (Figure a) with three fused thieno[3,2‐b]thiophene as the central unit flanked with two electron‐withdrawing 2‐(5,6‐difluoro‐3‐oxo‐2‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐ioden‐1‐ylidene)malononitrile end groups. Considering the extended conjunction framework, we choose 4‐(2‐ethylhexylbenzene) as the side chain to enhance its solubility. As expected, 3TT‐FIC showed maximum absorption peak located at 851 nm and a low optical bandgap of 1.25 eV. PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC‐based devices gave a PCE of 12.21% with a high J sc of 25.89 mA cm−2. Considering the low EQE response in the range 300–500 nm for the above two‐component devices, we used phenyl‐C71‐butyric‐acid‐methyl ester (PC) as the third component to fabricate the ternary device in order to lift the EQE response in the range of 300–500 nm and thus improve J sc without sacrificing V oc and FF. As expected, an evident EQE improvement was realized in the range 300–700 nm even with a small amount of 12% PC in weight ratio. The PCE was elevated from 12.21% to 13.54% with evidently enhanced J sc from 25.89 to 27.73 mA cm−2, and also slightly improved V oc and FF. From the morphology analysis, the incorporation of small amount of PC could also ameliorate the nanoscaled phase separation morphology, facilitate the charge transferring, and enhance the crystallinity in nonfullerene acceptor‐based devices.
Figure 1

Chemical structures of a) 3TT‐FIC nonfullerene acceptor and b) PTB7‐Th donor, c) UV–Vis absorption spectra of PTB7‐Th, PC, and 3TT‐FIC in neat film, d) the device structure.

Chemical structures of a) 3TT‐FIC nonfullerene acceptor and b) PTB7‐Th donor, c) UV–Vis absorption spectra of PTB7‐Th, PC, and 3TT‐FIC in neat film, d) the device structure. The synthetic route of 3TT‐FIC was shown in Figure S1 (Supporting Information), and the detailed synthesis procedure and the corresponding characterization data were given in the Supporting Information (SI). The precursor 1 was obtained by Stille coupling from two commercial materials and then nucleophilic addition of lithium reagent (4‐(2‐ethylhexylbenzene) lithium) with compound 1 to obtain the alcohol intermediate. The central unit 2 was synthesized using conc H2SO4 in tetrahydrofuran. The dialdehyde intermediate was prepared by the Vilsmeier–Haack reaction as a yellow‐red solid. Finally, the target molecule was obtained by Knoevenagel condensation in 86% yield. As shown in the thermogravimetric analysis (Figure S2, Supporting Information) measurement, 3TT‐FIC demonstrated high thermal stability up to 340 °C without decomposition. The introduction of four 2‐ethylhexyl in the side chains made 3TT‐FIC to have good solubility in chloroform, chlorobenzene, tetrahydrofuran, and other common solvents. As shown in Figure S3 (Supporting Information), in dilute chloroform, 3TT‐FIC shows broad and strong absorption with the λmax located at 799 nm (ε = 2.1 × 105 M−1 cm−1). In the neat film, 3TT‐FIC exhibits broaden and red‐shifted absorption peaks located at 851 nm with the absorption edge extended to 995 nm, corresponding a low optical energy band gap (E g opt) of 1.25 eV (as shown in Table ). The combination of 3TT‐FIC and PTB7‐Th shows broad and complementary absorption and provides a broad absorption ranging from 520 to 995 nm (Figure 1c). The density functional theory based on the B3LYP/6‐31G* bias set was used to evaluate the chemical geometry structure, in which the 2‐ethylhexyl side chains were replaced by methyl to simplify the calculation process. As revealed in Figure S4a (Supporting Information), the electron cloud density of highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) mainly located at the central building block, but its lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) is delocalized preferably at the end group. From Figure S4b (Supporting Information), 3TT‐FIC backbone shows preferable planarity with dihedral angle of 0o, which is beneficial for efficient π–π stacking and electron transfer. The HOMO/LUMO energy levels of 3TT‐FIC were determined by cyclic voltammetry measurement using solid film in its acetonitrile solution (Figure S5a, Supporting Information). The HOMO and LUMO of 3TT‐FIC were calculated to be −5.42 and −4.17 eV (E HOMO + E g opt), respectively.
Table 1

Photophysical and electrochemical parameters of 3TT‐FIC

Comp.λmax sol [nm]λmax film [nm]λonset film [nm]a) E g opt [eV]a) HOMO [eV]LUMO [eV]εmax (M−1 cm−1)a)
3TT‐FIC 7998519951.25−5.42−4.172.1 × 105

E g opt = 1240/λonset (eV).

Photophysical and electrochemical parameters of 3TT‐FIC E g opt = 1240/λonset (eV). The OSCs devices were fabricated using an inverted structure of ITO/ZnO/PFN‐Br/active layers/MoO3/Ag, where the active layers contained the binary blend of PTB7‐Th: 3TT‐FIC or ternary blend of PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC: PC. The detailed device optimization procedures were recorded in the supporting information (Tables S1 and S2, Supporting Information). For the binary devices, the optimal weight ratio of PTB7‐Th: 3TT‐FIC was 1:1.2 (with 10 mg PTB7‐Th and 12 mg 3TT‐FIC dissolved in chlorobenzene) with the active layer thickness of ≈100 nm. A high PCE of 12.21% with J sc of 25.89 mA cm−2, V oc of 0.662 V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.71 was achieved via a solvent vapor annealing process with chloroform. The current density–voltage (J–V) curves of the optimized device are shown in Figure a, and the corresponding photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Table . As shown in Figure 2b, the binary OSCs gave a broad EQE response in the range from 300 to 1000 nm with high EQE values around 0.80 in the range from 660 to 820 nm. The calculated integrated J sc value from EQE curve was 24.64 mA cm−2, which is consistent with the measured value (25.89 mA cm−2) with a mismatch of 4.8%.
Figure 2

a) Current density–voltage (J–V) curves of PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC based binary device and PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PC based ternary device under one sun illumination (AM 1.5 G 100 mW cm−2). b) EQE spectra of the corresponding devices. c) J ph versus V eff and d) light‐intensity (P) dependence of J sc measurement of the devices.

Table 2

The photovoltaic data of the optimized devices based on PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC and PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PC under the illumination of AM 1.5G (100 mW cm−2)

Comp. V oc [V]FF J sc J–V [mA cm−2]PCE [%]a)
1:1.2:00.6620.71225.8912.21 (11.96 ± 0.25)
1:1.2:0.150.6660.71927.3613.10 (12.79 ± 0.31)
1:1.2:0.300.6690.73027.7313.54 (13.33 ± 0.21)
1:1.2:0.450.6710.69027.2912.63 (12.28 ± 0.35)

The PCE values were calculated from 20 devices for each case.

a) Current density–voltage (J–V) curves of PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC based binary device and PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PC based ternary device under one sun illumination (AM 1.5 G 100 mW cm−2). b) EQE spectra of the corresponding devices. c) J ph versus V eff and d) light‐intensity (P) dependence of J sc measurement of the devices. The photovoltaic data of the optimized devices based on PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC and PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PC under the illumination of AM 1.5G (100 mW cm−2) The PCE values were calculated from 20 devices for each case. Note from Figure 2b, the EQE response in the short wavelength range is clearly lower than that in the longer wavelength range. Although with overall weak absorption, PC has relatively good absorption and could enhance EQE response in the short wavelength range in both binary and ternary devices.28, 29, 32 Also for the ternary devices, PCM could form cascade energy level to facilitate the charge separation and tune the active layer morphology.25, 32, 36 Thus, in order to lift the short wavelength range EQE and thus improve the J sc, we chose PC as the third component to fabricate the PTB7‐Th: 3TT‐FIC:PC ternary blend device. After carefully device optimizations, the best weight ratio of PTB7‐Th: 3TT‐FIC: PC was 1:1.2:0.3 in wt% (with 3 mg PC added into the binary device), and a high PCE of 13.54% with an enhanced J sc of 27.73 mA cm−2, FF of 0.73 and V oc of 0.669 V was achieved. In comparison with the binary device, the ternary OSCs showed an evidently enhanced EQE response from 300 to 700 nm after incorporation of PC. Although the EQE response in the long wavelength range 750–900 nm was slightly downshifted as expected, the calculated integrated J sc in the whole EQE response window of the ternary device was improved to 26.41 mA cm−2 (mismatch factor of 4.7% compared with J sc from J–V measurement), compared with that of 25.89 mA cm−2 for the binary device. The photocurrent (J ph) versus the effective applied voltage (V eff) (Figure 2c) measurements were conducted to investigate and compare the exciton dissociation and charge collection dynamics for the binary and ternary devices. The J ph was calculated from the value of J L−J D, where J L and J D represent the current density under illumination and in the dark. The V eff is determined by the V 0−V a, where V 0 is the voltage when J L = J D and V a is the applied voltage.37, 38 As depicted in Figure , when V eff exceeds 1.6 V, J ph becomes saturated (J sat), indicating both types of the devices derived high charge extraction probability under high voltages. The ratio of J ph/J sat calculated from the ternary device was 0.96, which is higher than that of the binary device (0.94) under short circuit conditions. In addition, under maximal power output conditions, the ternary devices also gave a higher value (0.85) of J ph/J sat than that (0.83) of the binary devices. These results indicate that the addition of PC in the PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC based device offers higher exciton dissociation and more efficient charge collection efficiency. The light‐intensity dependence of J sc results are shown in Figure 2d. According to the equation of J sc∝P α,37 a slope of 0.995 and 0.988 were obtained for the ternary and binary based devices, respectively, indicating that both the ternary and binary devices showed low bimolecular recommendation with the slope value close to 1. The space charge limit current measurement was used to measure the charge mobility and the corresponding curves are listed in Figure S6 a,b (Supporting Information). The electron and hole mobility of the ternary device are 2.28 × 10−4 and 2.16 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively, which are slightly larger and more balanced than those of the binary device (1.67 × 10−4 and 2.09 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1). These results are consistent with the improved FFs of the ternary devices.
Figure 3

AFM images for a) PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC blend film and b) PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PC71BM blend film. TEM images for c) TB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC blend film and d) PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PCBM blend film.

AFM images for a) PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC blend film and b) PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PC71BM blend film. TEM images for c) TB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC blend film and d) PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PCBM blend film. The atomic force microscopy (AFM) under typing‐mode and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were utilized to study the morphologies of the PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC blend film and also the corresponding ternary film. As shown in AFM images (Figure 3a,b), the morphology of the binary and ternary blend films showed little difference with nearly the same root‐mean‐square surface roughness values of 1.60 and 1.59 nm. In TEM images (Figure 3c,d), both the binary and ternary blend film showed good nanoscale fibrillar structure phase separation, with the ternary based film showing relatively clearer and better continuous phase separation. The 2D grazing incidence wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (GIXD) was measured to investigate the microstructural molecular packing in the blend of PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC and PTB7‐Th:3TT‐FIC:PC films (Figure a,b). The single component GIXD results are shown in Figure S7 (Supporting Information), where PTB7‐Th polymer shows a dominant face‐on orientation with a (100) reflection of 0.27 Å−1 at the in‐plane (IP) direction and a sharp (010) reflection at the out‐of‐plane (OOP) direction of 1.58 Å−1. The 3TT‐FIC acceptor shows a wide (100) reflection at 0.35 Å−1 and a π–π stacking in the OOP direction at 1.80 Å−1. The diffraction peak of PC located at 1.32 Å−1 both in the IP and OOP direction.24, 25 However, there was no evident PC diffraction peak in the ternary blend film owing to the minor addition of PC. From the line‐cut profiles (Figure 4c), the binary and ternary blend films exhibit relatively weak (100) diffraction peaks in both the in‐plane and out‐of‐plane directions. The binary blend film has strong (010) diffraction peaks in the out‐of‐plane direction, due to the combined diffraction features of PTB7‐Th and 3TT‐FIC and located at 1.66 Å−1 and 1.81 Å−1 by Gaussian fitting with the full‐width at half‐maximum (Δq) 0.40 and 0.23 Å, respectively (Figure S8a, Supporting Information).33 From Scherrer equation,39 the crystal coherence length (CCL) in the (010) diffraction direction was estimated to be 24.6 Å for 3TT‐FIC with a π–π stacking distance of 3.47 Å. In the ternary film, contrary to the binary blend film, the (010) peak of 3TT‐FIC was located at 1.83 Å−1 with a Δq of 0.16 Å, which corresponds with an enhanced CCL of 34.4 Å and a shorter π–π stacking distance of 3.43 Å for 3TT‐FIC (Figure S8b, Supporting Information). For the PTB7‐Th, in the ternary blend film, the (010) direction located at 1.67−1 Å with a Δq of 0.40 Å, which represents a similar (010) diffraction peak and crystallinity with the binary blend film. These results indicate that the incorporation of PC have increased the crystallinity of 3TT‐FIC and its π–π stacking pattern in the ternary device. This is consistent with the measured charge mobility and the FF values discussed above.
Figure 4

2D GIXD images of the a) binary and b) ternary blend films. c) The out‐of‐plane (black line) and in‐plane (red line) line‐cut profiles.

2D GIXD images of the a) binary and b) ternary blend films. c) The out‐of‐plane (black line) and in‐plane (red line) line‐cut profiles. In summary, a new NFA named 3TT‐FIC has been designed and synthesized with an extending conjugated central core and electron‐withdrawing difluoro substituted indanone end group. 3TT‐FIC possessed strong and broad absorption with the maximum absorption peak located at 995 nm and a low optical bandgap of 1.25 eV in the thin film. The binary device based on 3TT‐FIC and PTB7‐Th gave a power conversion efficiency of 12.21% with a high J sc of 25.89 mA cm−2. From the perspective of complementary absorption and EQE response improvement, a ternary device based on the above binary OSC by introducing PC as the third component was fabricated and studied. A high PCE with value of 13.54% and J sc of 27.73 mA cm−2 was achieved for the ternary device. The PCE enhancement was mainly ascribed to the improved EQE response in the visible range and thus J sc after the addition of PC. Meanwhile, the V oc nearly kept unchanged and FF was also slightly improved owing to the more balanced hole and electron mobilities and better morphology with the introduction of PC. This work demonstrates that when the additional component was chosen properly, higher performance could be further obtained above the corresponding optimized binary devices.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  19 in total

1.  Recent Advances in Bulk Heterojunction Polymer Solar Cells.

Authors:  Luyao Lu; Tianyue Zheng; Qinghe Wu; Alexander M Schneider; Donglin Zhao; Luping Yu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Molecular Optimization Enables over 13% Efficiency in Organic Solar Cells.

Authors:  Wenchao Zhao; Sunsun Li; Huifeng Yao; Shaoqing Zhang; Yun Zhang; Bei Yang; Jianhui Hou
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Highly Efficient Inverted D:A1:A2 Ternary Blend Organic Photovoltaics Combining a Ladder-type Non-Fullerene Acceptor and a Fullerene Acceptor.

Authors:  Shao-Ling Chang; Fong-Yi Cao; Wen-Chia Huang; Po-Kai Huang; Chain-Shu Hsu; Yen-Ju Cheng
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 9.229

4.  Stretchable polymer solar cell fibers.

Authors:  Zhitao Zhang; Zhibin Yang; Jue Deng; Ye Zhang; Guozhen Guan; Huisheng Peng
Journal:  Small       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 13.281

5.  Fine-Tuned Photoactive and Interconnection Layers for Achieving over 13% Efficiency in a Fullerene-Free Tandem Organic Solar Cell.

Authors:  Yong Cui; Huifeng Yao; Bowei Gao; Yunpeng Qin; Shaoqing Zhang; Bei Yang; Chang He; Bowei Xu; Jianhui Hou
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Ternary-Blend Polymer Solar Cells Combining Fullerene and Nonfullerene Acceptors to Synergistically Boost the Photovoltaic Performance.

Authors:  Heng Lu; Jicheng Zhang; Jianya Chen; Qian Liu; Xue Gong; Shiyu Feng; Xinjun Xu; Wei Ma; Zhishan Bo
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  Conjugated Polymer-Small Molecule Alloy Leads to High Efficient Ternary Organic Solar Cells.

Authors:  Jianqi Zhang; Yajie Zhang; Jin Fang; Kun Lu; Zaiyu Wang; Wei Ma; Zhixiang Wei
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Ultrathin and lightweight organic solar cells with high flexibility.

Authors:  Martin Kaltenbrunner; Matthew S White; Eric D Głowacki; Tsuyoshi Sekitani; Takao Someya; Niyazi Serdar Sariciftci; Siegfried Bauer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  High-performance ternary blend polymer solar cells involving both energy transfer and hole relay processes.

Authors:  Luyao Lu; Wei Chen; Tao Xu; Luping Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Flexible, highly efficient all-polymer solar cells.

Authors:  Taesu Kim; Jae-Han Kim; Tae Eui Kang; Changyeon Lee; Hyunbum Kang; Minkwan Shin; Cheng Wang; Biwu Ma; Unyong Jeong; Taek-Soo Kim; Bumjoon J Kim
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent Progress in the Design of Fused-Ring Non-Fullerene Acceptors-Relations between Molecular Structure and Optical, Electronic, and Photovoltaic Properties.

Authors:  Bettina Schweda; Matiss Reinfelds; Petra Hofstadler; Gregor Trimmel; Thomas Rath
Journal:  ACS Appl Energy Mater       Date:  2021-10-26

2.  A New Wide Bandgap Donor Polymer for Efficient Nonfullerene Organic Solar Cells with a Large Open-Circuit Voltage.

Authors:  Yumin Tang; Huiliang Sun; Ziang Wu; Yujie Zhang; Guangye Zhang; Mengyao Su; Xin Zhou; Xia Wu; Weipeng Sun; Xianhe Zhang; Bin Liu; Wei Chen; Qiaogan Liao; Han Young Woo; Xugang Guo
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 16.806

3.  Characterization of optical manipulation using microlens arrays depending on the materials and sizes in organic photovoltaics.

Authors:  Dongwook Ko; Bongjun Gu; Yoohan Ma; Sungjin Jo; Dong Choon Hyun; Chang Su Kim; Hyeon-Ju Oh; Jongbok Kim
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  880 nm NIR-Triggered Organic Small Molecular-Based Nanoparticles for Photothermal Therapy of Tumor.

Authors:  Yunying Zhao; Zheng He; Qiang Zhang; Jing Wang; Wenying Jia; Long Jin; Linlin Zhao; Yan Lu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Digital printing of a novel electrode for stable flexible organic solar cells with a power conversion efficiency of 8.5.

Authors:  S Wageh; Mahfoudh Raïssi; Thomas Berthelot; Matthieu Laurent; Didier Rousseau; Abdullah M Abusorrah; Omar A Al-Hartomy; Ahmed A Al-Ghamdi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.