| Literature DB >> 29937850 |
Eman Abd Elmohsin Dawoud1, Elshahat Ibrahem Ismail2, Soheir Abdel-Gaber Eltoukhy3, Ayman El-Saeed El-Sharabasy2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate audiological and vestibular functions via basic audiological evaluation, otoacoustic emissions and videonystagmography (VNG) in vitiligo patients.Entities:
Keywords: Otoacoustic emissions; Videonystagmography; Vitiligo
Year: 2017 PMID: 29937850 PMCID: PMC5963464 DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2017.07.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Otol ISSN: 1672-2930
Fig. 1Rule of nine (LIoyd and Rodgers, 2012).
Dermatological results of study group as regards type of vitiligo, percent of body surface area involved and duration of vitiligo.
| No. | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Acrofacial | 8 | 26.7 |
| Mixed | 22 | 73.3 |
| Less than 25% | 20 | 66.7 |
| 25-50% | 10 | 33.3 |
| Less or equal 18 months | 13 | 43.33 |
| More than 18 months | 17 | 56.66 |
Comparison between the study and control groups as regard to pure tone audiometry and speech discrimination scores.
| Frequency Hz | Ear | Study (n = 30 patients) | Control (n = 30 subjects) | T | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 250 | Right | 16.67 ± 5.92 | 13.33 ± 3.56 | 2.643∗ | 0.011∗ |
| Left | 16.0 ± 4.98 | 12.33 ± 2.54 | 3.592∗ | 0.001∗ | |
| 500 | Right | 14.33 ± 4.69 | 13.50 ± 3.51 | 0.780 | 0.439 |
| Left | 16.0 ± 4.43 | 13.0 ± 2.82 | 3.128∗ | 0.003∗ | |
| 1000 | Right | 15.0 ± 4.91 | 13.17 ± 3.59 | 1.650 | 0.104 |
| Left | 13.83 ± 4.49 | 14.0 ± 3.57 | 0.159 | 0.874 | |
| 2000 | Right | 17.33 ± 5.53 | 13.83 ± 3.13 | 3.017∗ | 0.004∗ |
| Left | 15.67 ± 5.37 | 15.50 ± 4.22 | 0.134 | 0.894 | |
| 4000 | Right | 21.17 ± 9.62 | 14.67 ± 3.70 | 3.454∗ | 0.001∗ |
| Left | 20.0 ± 10.42 | 16.67 ± 4.61 | 1.602 | 0.117 | |
| 8000 | Right | 22.33 ± 10.65 | 14.83 ± 4.45 | 3.560∗ | 0.001∗ |
| Left | 19.67 ± 11.59 | 16.33 ± 4.14 | 1.483 | 0.147 | |
| DS% | Right | 99.73 ± 1.01 | 99.60 ± 1.61 | 0.384 | 0.703 |
| Left | 99.87 ± 0.73 | 99.20 ± 2.20 | 1.573 | 0.125 |
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05. There were statistically significant differences at some frequencies in pure tone audiometry.
Comparison of transient otoacoustic emissions signal to noise ratio (SNR) in study and control groups.
| Frequency Hz | Study (60 ears) | Control (60 ears) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | Median | IQR | ||
| 1000 | 3.05 | 0.85–6.40 | 8.05 | 5.75–10.05 | <0.001* |
| 1500 | 6.00 | 3.20–11.80 | 9.45 | 6.00–12.90 | 0.007* |
| 2000 | 8.50 | 4.55–12.40 | 9.10 | 5.85–11.10 | 0.7 |
| 3000 | 8.10 | 2.30–11.00 | 9.40 | 5.60–11.50 | 0.085 |
| 4000 | 8.15 | 6.10–11.35 | 7.9s20 | 5.45–11.25 | 0.99 |
Test used: Mann–Whitney *statistically significant. There were statistically significant differences at 1000 and 1500 Hz between study and control groups.
Comparison of distortion otoacoustic emissions SNR in study and control groups.
| F2 frequency Hz | Study (60 ears) | Control (60 ears) | P | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Percentile 25 | Percentile 75 | Median | Percentile 25 | Percentile 75 | ||
| 750 | 1.80 | −3.35 | 8.45 | 9.50 | 7.90 | 11.60 | <0.001* |
| 984 | 6.60 | −1.05 | 10.55 | 9.70 | 8.10 | 13.50 | <0.001* |
| 1500 | 9.00 | −0.30 | 15.80 | 11.05 | 8.70 | 14.60 | 0.01* |
| 2016 | 10.15 | 5.10 | 16.95 | 10.75 | 8.70 | 16.80 | 0.16 |
| 3000 | 13.40 | 9.15 | 18.80 | 12.00 | 9.00 | 17.80 | 0.98 |
| 3984 | 11.45 | 7.10 | 18.70 | 11.55 | 9.00 | 18.70 | 0.4 |
| 6000 | 8.35 | 0.25 | 12.60 | 11.40 | 8.30 | 15.40 | 0.001* |
| 7969 | 6.80 | 3.10 | 10.20 | 9.90 | 7.70 | 12.90 | <0.001* |
Test used: Mann Whitney test. *statistically significant. There were statistically significant differences at most frequencies between study and control groups.
Fig. 2Vestibular test results in study group. Fig. 2 showed 10 (33%) patients VN, 5 (17%) pcBPPV and 15 (50%) with normal vestibular function in vitiligo patients.
Fig. 3Comparison of caloric test in study and control groups. Fig. 3 showed caloric weakness in study and control groups.