| Literature DB >> 29937266 |
Nicole Eichert1, Lennart Verhagen2, Davide Folloni2, Saad Jbabdi3, Alexandre A Khrapitchev4, Nicola R Sibson4, Dante Mantini5, Jerome Sallet2, Rogier B Mars6.
Abstract
Evolutionary adaptations of the human brain are the basis for our unique abilities such as language. An expansion of the arcuate fasciculus (AF), the dorsal language tract, in the human lineage involving left lateralization is considered canonical, but this hypothesis has not been tested in relation to other architectural adaptations in the human brain. Using diffusion-weighted MRI, we examined AF in the human and macaque and quantified species differences in white matter architecture and surface representations. To compare surface results in the two species, we transformed macaque representations to human space using a landmark-based monkey-to-human cortical expansion model. We found that the human dorsal AF, but not the ventral inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFO), is left-lateralized. In the monkey AF is not lateralized. Moreover, compared to the macaque, human AF is relatively increased with respect to IFO. A comparison of human and transformed macaque surface representations suggests that cortical expansion alone cannot account for the species differences in the surface representation of AF. Our results show that the human AF has undergone critical anatomical modifications in comparison with the macaque AF. More generally, this work demonstrates that studies on the human brain specializations underlying the language connectome can benefit from current methodological advances in comparative neuroanatomy.Entities:
Keywords: Arcuate fasciculus; Comparative neuroanatomy; Cortical tract representation; Diffusion-weighted MRI; Neuroecology
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29937266 PMCID: PMC6699597 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cortex ISSN: 0010-9452 Impact factor: 4.027
Fig. 1Tractography results (a) Tractogram of the left human AF projected on a standard brain (MNI). Shown is the result thresholded at .3 of the log-transformed and normalized group average (n = 25). Seed and target masks are shown in dark blue. (b) Surface representation of the human AF. Shown is the group average of smoothed representations thresholded at .9 of the log-transformed and normalized data (n = 25). (c) Tractogram of the average macaque AF projected on a standard brain (F99) (n = 5). Seed and target masks are shown in dark blue. The posterior mask is located at x = −13 and here projected to x = −17 for visualization. (d) Average surface representation of the macaque AF (n = 5) projected on a single individual macaque surface. The display parameters for the results in (c) and (d) are the same as in (a) and (b), respectively.
Fig. 2Species differences (a) Lateralization indices in human (H) and macaque (M) volume data for AF (red) and IFO (blue). (b) Lateralization indices in human and macaque surface data. (c) Interhemispheric differences of the human AF representations (Cohen's d) mapped onto the left hemisphere of a standard brain (Left-lateralization: red, right-lateralization: black). (d) Dorsal/ventral index in human and macaque volume data. (e) Dorsal/ventral index in human and macaque surface data.
Fig. 3Landmark-based transformation (a) Regions of interest in the standard macaque brain surface (F99). Left panel: TPO selected based on macaque reference atlas. Right panel: Thresholded (.9) average surface representation of the left macaque AF, displayed as described in Fig. 1. (b) Regions of interest mapped onto the human standard brain surface by applying the Caret transformation (Van Essen & Dierker, 2007). (c) Species comparison can be performed with regions of interest in the same space. Shown is the thresholded (.9) average surface representation of the human AF, displayed as described in Fig. 1, overlaid with the macaque region of interest (black outline).