Jeffrey T Jensen1, William Schlaff2, Keith Gordon3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: keith.gordon@abbvie.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the available clinical evidence on the use of combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) agents (estrogen [E]-progestin combinations) for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain. DESIGN: A systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Derwent Drug File databases for prospective clinical studies. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Women with endometriosis diagnosed by validated means. INTERVENTION(S): Combined hormonal contraceptive agents, active comparators, placebo, or no treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Endometriosis-related pain (dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia). RESULT(S): Nine randomized controlled trials and nine observational studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of data was low: only two of the nine randomized trials were placebo controlled, and most trials were not blinded. The CHC agents were reported to significantly reduce dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia from baseline in most studies; continuous administration seemed to be more useful than cyclic administration. The effectiveness of CHC agents for pain reduction was similar to or less than that of oral progestins and GnRH agonists. CONCLUSION(S): The available literature suggests that CHC treatment is effective for relief of endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia; however, the supportive data are of low quality. Furthermore, insufficient data exist to reach conclusions about the overall superiority of any given CHC therapy, and the relative benefit in comparison to other approaches. Additional high-quality studies are needed to clarify the role of CHC agents and other treatments in women with endometriosis-related pain.
OBJECTIVE: To review the available clinical evidence on the use of combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) agents (estrogen [E]-progestin combinations) for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain. DESIGN: A systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Derwent Drug File databases for prospective clinical studies. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Women with endometriosis diagnosed by validated means. INTERVENTION(S): Combined hormonal contraceptive agents, active comparators, placebo, or no treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Endometriosis-related pain (dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia). RESULT(S): Nine randomized controlled trials and nine observational studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of data was low: only two of the nine randomized trials were placebo controlled, and most trials were not blinded. The CHC agents were reported to significantly reduce dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia from baseline in most studies; continuous administration seemed to be more useful than cyclic administration. The effectiveness of CHC agents for pain reduction was similar to or less than that of oral progestins and GnRH agonists. CONCLUSION(S): The available literature suggests that CHC treatment is effective for relief of endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia; however, the supportive data are of low quality. Furthermore, insufficient data exist to reach conclusions about the overall superiority of any given CHC therapy, and the relative benefit in comparison to other approaches. Additional high-quality studies are needed to clarify the role of CHC agents and other treatments in women with endometriosis-related pain.
Authors: Kerstin Becker; Klaas Heinemann; Bruno Imthurn; Lena Marions; Sabine Moehner; Christoph Gerlinger; Marco Serrani; Thomas Faustmann Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Nicholas Leyland; Stephanie J Estes; Bruce A Lessey; Arnold P Advincula; Hugh S Taylor Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 2.681