Literature DB >> 29937000

Comparability of histological outcomes in rats and humans in a hernia model.

Leontine C L van den Hil1, Ruben R M Vogels2, Kevin W Y van Barneveld2, Marion J J Gijbels3, Carine J Peutz-Kootstra4, Jack P M Cleutjens4, Marc H F Schreinemacher5, Nicole D Bouvy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed operations. In search of the ideal mesh for hernia repair, animal research is required. Although rats are most often used in experimental mesh experiments, no correlation with clinical findings in humans has ever been shown. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate whether adhesion formation and foreign body reactions to meshes in rats are comparable with the reactions in humans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fixed type of mesh was implanted intraperitoneally in a group of 10 rats and 10 patients undergoing elective, temporary stoma formation. In case of the latter, meshes were placed around the stoma. After a follow-up period of 12 wk in rats and after a median follow-up of 6 mo in humans, samples of the mesh were collected. Adhesion assessments were performed, and (immuno-) histochemical evaluation was performed by a specialized experimental pathologist and an experienced clinical pathologist.
RESULTS: After the follow-up period, adhesion formation did not differ significantly between rats and humans. Moreover, general inflammation scores were comparable, although granulocytes and giant cells were more present in rats, compared with humans. On the other hand, the presence of fibrosis was more evident in humans compared with rats.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study, which showed that a specific animal model, namely a rat model, correlates with adhesion formation and the foreign body reaction to meshes in humans. It can be recommended to use rats in future experimental mesh for incisional hernia research.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adhesions; Comparability; Hernia model; Human; Rat

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29937000     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

1.  Prevention of incisional hernia using different suture materials for closing the abdominal wall: a comparison of PDS, Vicryl and Prolene in a rat model.

Authors:  S van Steensel; L C L van den Hil; A Bloemen; M J Gijbels; S O Breukink; J Melenhorst; K Lenaerts; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Examination of lipid profiles in abdominal fascial healing using MALDI-TOF to identify potential therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Jianhua Cao; Benjamin Balluff; Audrey C H M Jongen; Marion J Gijbels; Jarno Melenhorst; Ron M A Heeren; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab       Date:  2021-06-08

Review 3.  Comparison of coated meshes for intraperitoneal placement in animal studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Liu; S van Steensel; M Gielen; T Vercoulen; J Melenhorst; B Winkens; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  The experimental methodology and comparators used for in vivo hernia mesh testing: a 10-year scoping review.

Authors:  T Whitehead-Clarke; R Karanjia; J Banks; V Beynon; S Parker; D Sanders; V Mudera; A Windsor; A Kureshi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.