Literature DB >> 29936547

Sprouting of paradormant and endodormant grapevine buds under conditions of forced growth: similarities and differences.

Francisco J Pérez1, Ximena Noriega2.   

Abstract

MAIN
CONCLUSION: Bud-break assays under forced growth conditions suggest that a drop in ABA content and an increase in sugars are common features in the sprouting of paradormant (PD) and endodormant (ED) grapevine buds. However, increases in cell division and in respiration are unique characteristics of the ED budding. In tropical and subtropical regions where the variations in day length and temperatures are minor throughout the year, the rupture of grapevine buds can be achieved during the current growing season given rise to a double-cropping system annually. However, it is unknown whether the breaking buds are in the paradormancy (PD) or endodormancy (ED) stage. In this study, we compared the breakage of PD and ED buds under conditions of forced growth. To do this, the expression of genes related to the metabolism of phytohormones and sugars, and of relevant physiological functions such as respiration and cell division was analyzed temporally throughout the incubation period in both types of buds. An early fall in the expression of the ABA biosynthesis gene (VvNCED1) and increases in genes related to sugar metabolism and transports were observed during the incubation period in both types of buds. However, while in the PD buds, the genes related to respiration and the cell cycle did not undergo significant changes in their expression during the incubation period, in the ED buds, the expression of these genes together with those related to auxin and cytokinin biosynthesis experienced a large increase. The results suggest that a drop in ABA content and an increase in sugars are early signals for the onset of bud break in both PD and ED vines, while the increase in respiration and cell division are unique characteristics of the ED buds, which reflect its transition from a resting state to a state of active growth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bud break; Bud dormancy; Bud respiration; Cell cycle; Grapevines; Phytohormones; Vitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29936547     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-018-2941-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  29 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Cyclin D1 determines mitochondrial function in vivo.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Sakamaki; Mathew C Casimiro; Xiaoming Ju; Andrew A Quong; Sanjay Katiyar; Manran Liu; Xuanmao Jiao; Anping Li; Xueping Zhang; Yinan Lu; Chenguang Wang; Stephen Byers; Robert Nicholson; Todd Link; Melvin Shemluck; Jianguo Yang; Stanley T Fricke; Phyllis M Novikoff; Alexandros Papanikolaou; Andrew Arnold; Christopher Albanese; Richard Pestell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Cytokinin and the cell cycle.

Authors:  G Eric Schaller; Ian H Street; Joseph J Kieber
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 4.  On the language and physiology of dormancy and quiescence in plants.

Authors:  Michael J Considine; John A Considine
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 5.  Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms.

Authors:  Filip Rolland; Elena Baena-Gonzalez; Jen Sheen
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 26.379

6.  Carbohydrate uptake from xylem vessels and its distribution among stem tissues and buds in walnut (Juglans regia L.).

Authors:  Marc Bonhomme; Médéric Peuch; Thierry Ameglio; Rémy Rageau; Agnès Guilliot; Mélanie Decourteix; Georges Alves; Soulaiman Sakr; André Lacointe
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.196

7.  Differences in respiration between dormant and non-dormant buds suggest the involvement of ABA in the development of endodormancy in grapevines.

Authors:  Francisca Parada; Ximena Noriega; Débora Dantas; Ricardo Bressan-Smith; Francisco J Pérez
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.549

8.  The dormancy-breaking stimuli "chilling, hypoxia and cyanamide exposure" up-regulate the expression of α-amylase genes in grapevine buds.

Authors:  Sebastián Rubio; Amanda Donoso; Francisco J Pérez
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.549

9.  Sucrose (JrSUT1) and hexose (JrHT1 and JrHT2) transporters in walnut xylem parenchyma cells: their potential role in early events of growth resumption.

Authors:  Mélanie Decourteix; Georges Alves; Marc Bonhomme; Mederic Peuch; Khaoula Ben Baaziz; Nicole Brunel; Agnès Guilliot; Rémy Rageau; Thierry Améglio; Gilles Pétel; Soulaïman Sakr
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Abscisic acid (ABA) regulates grape bud dormancy, and dormancy release stimuli may act through modification of ABA metabolism.

Authors:  Chuanlin Zheng; Tamar Halaly; Atiako Kwame Acheampong; Yumiko Takebayashi; Yusuke Jikumaru; Yuji Kamiya; Etti Or
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ascorbate glutathione-dependent H2O2 scavenging is an important process in axillary bud outgrowth in rosebush.

Authors:  Alexis Porcher; Vincent Guérin; Françoise Montrichard; Anita Lebrec; Jérémy Lothier; Alain Vian
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Integrated analysis of miRNAs and their targets reveals that miR319c/TCP2 regulates apical bud burst in tea plant (Camellia sinensis).

Authors:  Shengrui Liu; Xiaozeng Mi; Ran Zhang; Yanlin An; Qiying Zhou; Tianyuan Yang; Xiaobo Xia; Rui Guo; Xuewen Wang; Chaoling Wei
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Ascorbate-glutathione pathways mediated by cytokinin regulate H2O2 levels in light-controlled rose bud burst.

Authors:  Alexis Porcher; Vincent Guérin; Nathalie Leduc; Anita Lebrec; Jérémy Lothier; Alain Vian
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  The bud dormancy disconnect: latent buds of grapevine are dormant during summer despite a high metabolic rate.

Authors:  Yazhini Velappan; Tinashe G Chabikwa; John A Considine; Patricia Agudelo-Romero; Christine H Foyer; Santiago Signorelli; Michael J Considine
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Insight into Carbohydrate Metabolism and Signaling in Grapevine Buds during Dormancy Progression.

Authors:  Valeria De Rosa; Rachele Falchi; Erica Moret; Giannina Vizzotto
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09

6.  Hydrogen Peroxide Increases during Endodormancy and Decreases during Budbreak in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Buds.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Pérez; Ximena Noriega; Sebastián Rubio
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.