Literature DB >> 29935660

Comparison of pregnancy rates for poor responders using IVF with mild ovarian stimulation versus conventional IVF: a guideline.

.   

Abstract

Mild-stimulation protocols with in vitro fertilization (IVF) generally aim to use less medication than conventional IVF. This guideline evaluates pregnancy and live-birth rates in patients expected to be poor responders using mild ovarian stimulation and natural-cycle protocols vs conventional IVF.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29935660     DOI： 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN： 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

Review 1.  Testosterone therapy for women with poor ovarian response undergoing IVF: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Marco Noventa; Amerigo Vitagliano; Alessandra Andrisani; Mija Blaganje; Paola Viganò; Enrico Papaelo; Marco Scioscia; Francesco Cavallin; Guido Ambrosini; Mauro Cozzolino
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Protocols Alter Endometrial Histomorphology and Gene Expression Profiles.

Authors:  John L Wu; Patrick Keller; Mohammed Kanchwala; Chao Xing; Samir N Babayev; Bruce R Carr; Orhan Bukulmez; R Ann Word
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Minimal ovarian stimulation is an alternative to conventional protocols for older women according to Poseidon's stratification: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzolino; Gustavo Nardini Cecchino; Ernesto Bosch; Juan Antonio Garcia-Velasco; Nicolás Garrido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 4.  Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4.

Authors:  Thor Haahr; Carlos Dosouto; Carlo Alviggi; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Accumulation of embryos over 3 natural modified IVF (ICSI) cycles followed by transfer to improve the outcome of poor responders.

Authors:  A K Datta; S Campbell; N Felix; G Nargund
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2019-03

Review 6.  What Is the Best Regimen for Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders in ART/IVF?

Authors:  Zeev Blumenfeld
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF is the smartest way forward.

Authors:  G Nargund; B C J M Fauser
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Live Birth Rates in Poor Responders' Group after Previous Treatment with Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Compared with Poor Responders Used Only Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Before in Vitro Fertilization.

Authors:  Snezhana Stojkovska; Gligor Dimitrov; Nikoleta Stamenkovska; Makuli Hadzi-Lega; Zoran Petanovski
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-14

Review 9.  The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment.

Authors:  Polina Giannelou; Mara Simopoulou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Evangelos Makrakis; Adamantia Kontogeorgi; Agni Pantou; Dionysios Galatis; Theodoros Kalampokas; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Konstantinos Pantos; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11

10.  Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adrija Kumar Datta; Abha Maheshwari; Nirmal Felix; Stuart Campbell; Geeta Nargund
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 15.610
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.