Literature DB >> 29935402

Data value and care value in the practice of health systems: A case study in Uganda.

Eleanor Hutchinson1, Susan Nayiga2, Christine Nabirye2, Lilian Taaka2, Sarah G Staedke3.   

Abstract

In anthropology, interest in how values are created, maintained and changed has been reinvigorated. In this case study, we draw on this literature to interrogate concerns about the relationship between data collection and the delivery of patient care within global health. We followed a pilot study conducted in Kayunga, Uganda that aimed to improve the collection of health systems data in five public health centres. We undertook ethnographic research from July 2015 to September 2016 in health centres, at project workshops, meetings and training sessions. This included three months of observations by three fieldworkers; in-depth interviews with health workers (n = 15) and stakeholders (n = 5); and six focus group discussions with health workers. We observed that measurement, calculation and narrative practices could be assigned care-value or data-value and that the attempt to improve data collection within health facilities transferred 'data-value' into health centres with little consideration among project staff for its impact on care. We document acts of acquiescence and resistance to data-value by health workers. We also describe the rare moments when senior health workers reconciled these two forms of value, and care-value and data-value were enacted simultaneously. In contrast to many anthropological accounts, our analysis suggests that data-value and care-value are not necessarily conflicting. Actors seeking to make changes in health systems must, however, take into account local forms of value and devise health systems interventions that reinforce and enrich existing ethically driven practice.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Care giving; Data collection; Ethics; Health systems; Uganda; Value

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29935402     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  Barriers and enablers to routine register data collection for newborns and mothers: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study.

Authors:  Donat Shamba; Louise T Day; Joy E Lawn; Sojib Bin Zaman; Avinash K Sunny; Menna Narcis Tarimo; Kimberly Peven; Jasmin Khan; Nishant Thakur; Md Taqbir Us Samad Talha; Ashish K C; Rajib Haider; Harriet Ruysen; Tapas Mazumder; Md Hafizur Rahman; Md Ziaul Haque Shaikh; Johan Ivar Sæbø; Claudia Hanson; Neha S Singh; Joanna Schellenberg; Lara M E Vaz; Jennifer Requejo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Understanding the context of delays in seeking appropriate care for children with symptoms of severe malaria in Uganda.

Authors:  Arthur Mpimbaza; Susan Nayiga; Grace Ndeezi; Philip J Rosenthal; Charles Karamagi; Anne Katahoire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effectiveness of in-service training plus the collaborative improvement strategy on the quality of routine malaria surveillance data: results of a pilot study in Kayunga District, Uganda.

Authors:  Nelli Westercamp; Sarah G Staedke; Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi; Alex Ndyabakira; John Michael Okiring; Simon P Kigozi; Grant Dorsey; Edward Broughton; Eleanor Hutchinson; M Rashad Massoud; Alexander K Rowe
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.979

4.  Weak Data: The Social Biography of a Measurement Instrument and How It Failed to Ensure Accountability in Home Care.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Malene Bødker
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  2020-08-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.