Amir M Bassam Elnagar1,2, Abdelnasser Ibrahim3,4, Amro Mohamed Soliman5. 1. Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt. 2. Department of Pathology, Insaniah University, Kuala Ketil Kedah, Darul Aman, Malaysia. 3. Forensic Unit, Department of Pathology, National University of Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaakob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 4. Department of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. 5. Department of Anatomy, National University of Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaakob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic Address: dramrsoliman@yahoo.com.
Titanium dioxide (TiO2), also recognized as titaniumoxide or titania, is a naturally occurring oxide of titanium
which is commonly used as a colouring pigments to
provide a white colour in products such as dyes, plastic,
paper, and foods (1). TiO2 either alone or in mixtures,
is broadly used for a wide range of medical procedures.
However, in case of imbalanced biological conditions
such as low pH, TiO2 devices can release enormous
amounts of particles at both micrometer and nanometer
levels (2).The lethal effects of nanoparticles can be accredited to
their small size and hence outsized surface area which
results in increased rates of chemical reaction and infiltration
into the cells interfering with numerous subcellular
physiological mechanisms (3). For instance, studies
presented that nanoparticles may infiltrate into nuclei and
later may interfere with the organization and functions of
DNA (4). Furthermore, TiO2 nanoparticles may produce
reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting in cell toxicity
(5). Previous studies reported that TiO2 nanoparticles elicited
different antagonistic cellular properties including
DNA injury (6).Previous studies have established that TiO2.
cles may pass into the cells of the reproductive system
and induce damage (7). Takeda et al. (8) declared that
TiO2 nanoparticles were found in the testes and brain,
which indicated that TiO2 nanoparticles may penetrate
both blood-testis and blood-brain barriers. Komatsu et al.
(9) confirmed that TiO2 nanoparticles were absorbed in
Leydig’s cells leading to disruption of cellular proliferation
and dysregulation of the expression of heme oxygenase-
1 (HO-1), a steroidogenic regulatory protein, which
regulates mitochondrial cholesterol transfer. This implies
that long-period exposure to small doses of TiO2 nanoparticles
should not be ignored and the possible risks that
these particles may impose to reproductive health should
be considered, particularly in those who are occupationally
exposed to TiO2 nanoparticles.N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is an antioxidant and free-radical
scrounger. It acts as a cysteine contributor and upholds
or even upsurges the intracellular levels of glutathione
(GSH) (a tripeptide which guards cells against toxins).
NAC is characterized by its antioxidant ability through
releasing sulfhydryl groups which in turn, reduce ROS
levels and possess the ability to reduce oxidative stress
directly, suppress the nuclear factor kappa b (NF-.B) inflammation
pathway and inflammatory cytokines secretion,
and enhance the GSH production (10). NAC was
proven to fight oxidative stress-induced injury in several
tissues. For instance, administration of NAC suppressed
oxidative stress-induced cellular damage in different injury
models including head injury, endotoxin-induced lung
damage, liver injury, and heart disorders (11). In order to
explore the reproductive toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles,
the present study was conducted. The toxic effects of orally
administered TiO2 nanoparticles were evaluated in the
testes of adult albino rats through histopathological, ultrastructural
examinations, immunohistochemical detection
of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a, measurement of total
testosterone and oxidative stress levels, and comet assay.
Moreover, the possible protective effects of co-administration
of NAC and TiO2 nanoparticles were assessed.
Materials and Methods
The current experimental study was carried out in Animal
Laboratory, Zagazig University. TiO2 nanoparticles
(Titanos, China) were nanopowder of 21 nm size with
=99.5% purity dissolved in gum acacia solution. NAC was
purchased from SEDICO, Egypt. Fifty male albino rats
weighing 150-200 g were obtained from the Animal House,
Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University. The study was
conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Ethics
Committee for Research of Zagazig University. The rats
were divided into 5 groups. Group I was the control group
that received no treatment. Group II was treated with 1 ml
of 5% gum acacia solution (the solvent used for titanium
dioxide) by oral gavage once daily for 12 weeks. Group
III was orally treated with 100 mg/kg of NAC once daily
for 12 weeks. Group IV was orally treated with 1200 mg/
kg of TiO2 nanoparticles once daily for 12 weeks. Group
V was orally treated with a combination of 100 mg/kg of
NAC and 1200 mg/kg of TiO2 nanoparticles once daily for
12 weeks.For histopathological analysis, the left testis was fixed
in Bouin’s solution and the tissue was processed and embedded
in paraffin blocks for preparation of 5-µm thick
sections. Sections were stained with Haematoxylin and
Eosin and examined by light microscopy. Ultrastructural
examination of the left testis was conducted using the
Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM). The analysis
was performed according to the method described by
Glauret and Lewis (12). The stained sections were examined
by TEM in Electron Microscope Center in the
department of histology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig
University. Immunohistochemistry of the left testis was
performed using labeled streptavidin-biotin (LSAB) technique.
The deparaffinized sections were incubated with
hydrogen peroxide to block the endogenous peroxidase.
Then, sections were incubated with primary antibodies
for TNF-a (rabbit polyclonal TNF-a antibody). Then, sections
were incubated with the secondary antibodies and
peroxidase-labeled streptavidin. Staining was completed
by incubation with substrate chromogen, which resulted
in the brown-colored precipitates at the antigen sites.Blood was collected from the tail vein then it was centrifuged
to collect serum. Total testosterone level was
measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Malondialdehyde (MDA) was estimated by the thiobarbituric
acid assay. Estimation of reduced GSH level
was done using 5, 5’-dithiobis nitro benzoic acid assay.
The comet assay was performed according to the method
of Singh et al. (13) to evaluate the in vivo genotoxic potential
of TiO2 nanoparticles in rats using the single-cell
gel electrophoresis. Cells fixed in agarose were lysed to
form nucleoids containing the DNA material. Electrophoresis
at high pH results in comets which were detected
by fluorescence microscopy. Based on the integrity of the
comet tail and the head, we determined the number of
DNA breaks.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences software (SPSS version 22.0, IBM, USA).
Differences between multiple means (quantitative variables)
were evaluated by one way ANOVA test, followed
by LSD. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Macroscopic examinations of the left testis in terms of
color, testis to body weight ratio, and infarction of treated
groups revealed no significant changes compared to the control
group. Histopathological examination of groups I, II,
and III showed the same histological features without any
abnormal histopathological finding such as dark nuclei, hyaline
fluids, and blood extravasation into the interstitial spaces
(Fig .1A, B). Meanwhile, histological examination of group
IV showed disorganized seminiferous tubules, spermatogenic
cells with dark pyknotic nuclei, separation of basement
membranes, hyaline fluids, vacuolation, and extravasation
of blood in the interstitial tissue. Moreover, some tubules
showed thin layers of spermatogonia and sperms (Fig .1C). In
Group V, there was a minimal separation of basement membranes
with hyaline exudates in the interstitium (Fig .1D).
Fig.1
Photomicrograph showing histology of seminiferous tubules. A. Group I,
II, and B. Group III showing normal seminiferous tubules lined by spermatogonia
(Sg) close to the basal membrane (arrow), spermatogenic cells (Sc) with
many mitotic figures (M) and Sertoli cells (arrow head). Seminiferous tubules lumen
containing spermatid (Sp) with normal interstitial tissue (Ic) in between, C.
Group IV showing marked disorganization, spermatogenic cells with dark pyknotic
nuclei (tailed arrow), interstitial cells (Ic), basement membrane separation
in many areas (arrow), extensive area between seminiferous tubules, hyaline
exudate (H), and extravasation of blood (RBCs) in the interstitium, and D. Group
V showing: separation of basement membrane of seminiferous tubules (arrow)
and hyaline exudate (H) in the interstitium (H&E: ×200).
Photomicrograph showing histology of seminiferous tubules. A. Group I,
II, and B. Group III showing normal seminiferous tubules lined by spermatogonia
(Sg) close to the basal membrane (arrow), spermatogenic cells (Sc) with
many mitotic figures (M) and Sertoli cells (arrow head). Seminiferous tubules lumen
containing spermatid (Sp) with normal interstitial tissue (Ic) in between, C.
Group IV showing marked disorganization, spermatogenic cells with dark pyknotic
nuclei (tailed arrow), interstitial cells (Ic), basement membrane separation
in many areas (arrow), extensive area between seminiferous tubules, hyaline
exudate (H), and extravasation of blood (RBCs) in the interstitium, and D. Group
V showing: separation of basement membrane of seminiferous tubules (arrow)
and hyaline exudate (H) in the interstitium (H&E: ×200).Photomicrograph showing electron microscopy of a seminiferous tubule.
A, B. Group I, II ×4000, ×8000, C, and D. group III ×4000, showing spermatogenic
cells (Sc) with its euchromatic nucleus (N). The cytoplasm contains mitochondria
(M) and lysosomes (Ly); spermatogonia (Sg) resting on the basement
membrane (Bm) with adjacent blood capillary (Bc) and interstitial cell (ISC); and
a spermatid (Sr) with its acrosomal cap (A) and numerous vesicles (Vs).Photomicrograph showing electron microscopy of a seminiferous tubule. A, B. Group IV ×4000 showing irregular and thickened basement membrane (Bm), multi-folded euchromatic nuclei (N) with marked indentation (waved arrow), marked cytoplasmic vacuolation, mitochondria (M), lysosomes (Ly) and blood capillary (Bc), C, and D. Group V ×4000 showing vacuolation (V), spermatogonia (Sg) early spermatids (Sr) with their euchromatic nuclei and numerous vesicles (Vs), flattened myoid cell (My) and collagen fibers deposition (square) in the basement membrane (Bm).Using TEM, groups I, II, and II showed normal ultrastructures
including normal seminiferous tubules lined
with spermatogonia close to the basal membrane, spermatogenic
cells with many mitotic figures and sertoli
cells (Fig .2A-D). Group IV revealed signs of inflammatory
damage in the form of thickened irregular wavy
basement membrane with collagen fiber deposition,
many abnormal multi-folded euchromatic nuclei with
marked indentation, marked cytoplasmic vacuolation,
and swollen mitochondria (Fig .3A, B). Cytoplasmic
vacuolations with mild deposition of collagen fibers in
the basement membrane were observed in spermatid and
spermatogonia cells in group V (Fig .3C, D). Groups I,
II, and III showed a relatively low TNF-a immunoreactivity
(Fig .4A, B). On the other hand, a strong positive
TNF-a immunoreaction was detected in group IV
(Fig .4C) compared to group V which showed weaker
immunoreaction (Fig .4D).
Fig.2
Photomicrograph showing electron microscopy of a seminiferous tubule.
A, B. Group I, II ×4000, ×8000, C, and D. group III ×4000, showing spermatogenic
cells (Sc) with its euchromatic nucleus (N). The cytoplasm contains mitochondria
(M) and lysosomes (Ly); spermatogonia (Sg) resting on the basement
membrane (Bm) with adjacent blood capillary (Bc) and interstitial cell (ISC); and
a spermatid (Sr) with its acrosomal cap (A) and numerous vesicles (Vs).
Fig.3
Photomicrograph showing electron microscopy of a seminiferous tubule. A, B. Group IV ×4000 showing irregular and thickened basement membrane (Bm), multi-folded euchromatic nuclei (N) with marked indentation (waved arrow), marked cytoplasmic vacuolation, mitochondria (M), lysosomes (Ly) and blood capillary (Bc), C, and D. Group V ×4000 showing vacuolation (V), spermatogonia (Sg) early spermatids (Sr) with their euchromatic nuclei and numerous vesicles (Vs), flattened myoid cell (My) and collagen fibers deposition (square) in the basement membrane (Bm).
Fig.4
Photomicrograph showing immunohistochemistry of seminiferous
tubules. A. Group I, II, B. group III showing weak TNF-a immuno-reactivity,
C. Group IV showing strong positive TNF-a immunoreaction (arrow), and
D. Group V showing decreased TNF-a immuno-reactivity (×200).
Photomicrograph showing immunohistochemistry of seminiferous
tubules. A. Group I, II, B. group III showing weak TNF-a immuno-reactivity,
C. Group IV showing strong positive TNF-a immunoreaction (arrow), and
D. Group V showing decreased TNF-a immuno-reactivity (×200).There was an insignificant difference in total testosterone
level among groups I, II, and III. However, the total
testosterone level of group IV displayed a significant decrease
compared to groups I, II, and III. Total testosterone
level was significantly decreased in group V compared to
groups I, II, and III . Meanwhile, there was a significant
increase in total testosterone level of group V compared
to group IV (Table 1). GSH values were insignificantly
different among groups I, II, and III. However, there was
a significant decrease in GSH level of group IV when
compared with groups I, II, and III. Also, there was a significant
increase in GSH level of group V compared to
groups I, II, and III. Furthermore, there was a significant
increase in GSH level of group V compared to group IV
(Table 1). Additionally, there was a significant increase in
MDA level of group IV compared to groups I, II, and III
in addition to a significant increase in MDA level of group
V compared to groups I, II, and III. On the other hand,
there was a significant decrease (P<0.05) in MDA level of
group V compared to group IV (Table 1).
Table 1
Total testosterone, serum reduced glutathione (GSH), and serum malondialdehyde (MDA)
Biochemical parameters
Group I
Group II
group III
Group IV
Group V
Total testosterone (nmol/L)
23.8 ± 8.8bc
21.2 ± 8.6bc
26.2 ± 8.8bc
0.38 ± 0.0ac
15.4 ± 6.0ab
GSH (nmol/L)
50.2 ± 4.0bc
49.1 ± 3.9bc
52.8 ± 4.7bc
31.8 ± 5.7ac
61.9 ± 3.5ab
MDA (nmol/L)
74.9 ± 3.5bc
75.0 ± 3.9bc
73.9 ± 3.4bc
136.3 ± 21ac
85.7 ± 6.6ab
Values are referred as mean ± SD. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
a; significance with group I ,II and III, b; significance with group IV, and c; Significance with the group V.
Total testosterone, serum reduced glutathione (GSH), and serum malondialdehyde (MDA)Values are referred as mean ± SD. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.a; significance with group I ,II and III, b; significance with group IV, and c; Significance with the group V.Photomicrograph of comet test showing nuclei of testes cells. A. Group I, II, B. group III showing almost normal
condensed type nuclei and undamaged cells, C. Group IV showing abnormal tailed nuclei and damaged cells (white
arrow), and D. Group V showing less number of abnormal tailed nuclei and damaged cells.According to comet assay results, cells nuclei of group IV
showed a significant increase in percentage (%) of tailed nuclei,
tail length, tail DNA% and unit tail moment compared
to groups I, II, and III. Co-administration of NAC and TiO2
nanoparticles caused a significant decrease in DNA damage
parameters in group V compared to group IV. However,
there was a significant increase (P<0.05) in % of tailed nuclei,
tail length, tail DNA % and unit tail moment of group V
compared to groups I, II, and III (Fig .5).
Fig.5
Photomicrograph of comet test showing nuclei of testes cells. A. Group I, II, B. group III showing almost normal
condensed type nuclei and undamaged cells, C. Group IV showing abnormal tailed nuclei and damaged cells (white
arrow), and D. Group V showing less number of abnormal tailed nuclei and damaged cells.
Discussion
Prevalent applications of nanomaterial cause a huge
potential for human exposure to these compounds. However,
many experts and establishments have upstretched
the environmental and toxicological concerns regarding
nanotechnology (14). TiO2 nanoparticles have the ability
to drift through diverse paths and accumulate in body
tissues, which may lead to inflammation and apoptosis,
resulting in various organ damages. The present study
showed that TiO2 nanoparticles induced several histopathological
alterations in the testes compared to the
control group. Administration of NAC along with TiO2
nanoparticles showed improvements with minimal alterations
in seminiferous tubules. Gao et al. (7) showed that
nanoparticles-induced testicular injury and inhibition of
spermatogenesis may attribute to changes in male sex
hormone levels and testicular gene expression.Our results are supported by data reported by Takeda et
al. (8) which showed that exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles
resulted in disrupted seminiferous tubules and tubule lumens
with few mature sperms. Moreover, They observed
aggregates of nanoparticles in Leydig’s cells, sertoli cells,
and spermatids. Guo et al. (15) demonstrated a reduction
in sperm density and motility in mice injected with TiO2
nanoparticles. On the other hand, Wang et al. (16) reported
no abnormal pathological changes in the testes following
acute toxicity induced by nano-sized TiO2 particles. The inconsistencies
among these studies may be due to the differences in experimental conditions such as the animal model
as well as administered dose, exposure duration, and the
physicochemical characteristics of TiO2.In the present study, examination of the testis sections
of TiO2 nanoparticles-treated group revealed signs of inflammatory
damage in the testicular tissue. For instance,
administration of NAC along with TiO2 nanoparticles
showed partial improvement in testicular tissue, which was
found by histological and immunohistochemical examination.
However, cytoplasmic vacuolation was still observed
with mild collagen fibers deposition in the basement membrane.
From an ultrastructural point of view, variable sized
intercellular spaces were observed. El Ghazzawy et al. (17)
stated that intercellular spaces represented advanced degenerative
alterations damaging the cell membrane integrity as
a result of oxidative stress. ROS induce oxidative phosphorylation
of cell membranes resulting in interruption of
the integrity of the intercellular junctional complex. These
results are in accordance with those reported by Fouad et
al. (18) which were obtained based on electron microscopy
investigation of testicular tissues exposed to ROS and inflammatory
cytokines measurements.Co-administration of NAC and TiO2 nanoparticles led to
a reduction in TNF-a immunoreactivity. Our results are in
accordance with those indicated by Park et al. (19). Furthermore,
there was a significant increase in testosterone level of
the NAC+TiO2-treated group. A previous study found that
sex hormone balance in the male reproductive system was
disrupted by TiO2 nanoparticles exposure as the amount of
testosterone was greatly reduced which led to suppressed
spermatogenesis (7). Furthermore, EL-Sharkawy et al. (20)
detected lowered testosterone levels in rats administered
with TiO2; authors stated that reduction in testosterone secretion
may be due to the high level of NO, which led to hypospermatogenesis,
testicular inflammation, and disturbance of
gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion.Co-administration of NAC and TiO2 resulted in a significant
increase in GSH. These results showed a time-dependent
reduction in GSH level in TiO2 nanoparticles-treated
rats. Similar findings were reported by Long et al. (21)
who observed GSH exhaustion and an upsurge in the lipid
peroxidation levels after exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles.
ROS generation was suggested as a probable mechanism
involved in the toxicity of nanoparticles (5). Jeon et al. (22)
speculated that a part of the ROS generation may be due to
the catalytic properties of nanosized-TiO2. GSH level was
remarkably decreased in the TiO2-treated group. However,
it is worthy to say that GSH level was higher in NAC and
TiO2 treated-group compared to NAC-treated group which
was supposed to be decreased by TiO2. This may be explained
by the ability of NAC to induce antioxidant effects
in injury models rather than normal models (11, 23).There was a significant rise in MDA level in TiO2 nanoparticles-
treated group compared to the group treated
with NAC+TiO2. However, MDA levels in NAC+TiO2
nanoparticles-treated group were significantly higher than
those of the control group. Significant changes in MDA
levels suggest that induction of pathological lesions is
probably mediated through the oxidative stress enhanced
by the dumped nanoparticles. These results were consistent
with those reported by Attia et al. that showed a time-
dependent significant release of oxidative stress in the liver
as evident by increased MDA and reduced GSH levels
(24). Furthermore, Gurr et al. (5) revealed an exponential
increase in the MDA production caused by TiO2, and they
attributed this increase in lipid peroxidation to excessive
ROS generation.The comet assay is a broadly used assay for investigation
of DNA damage and repair, genotoxic properties of
chemicals and pharmaceuticals, environmental biomonitoring,
and also human monitoring. However, comet assay
has been used for determination of the toxicity of
highly reactive nanoparticles and several studies used it
to test the potential toxicity of manufactured nanoparticles
by assessing DNA strand breaks or oxidative DNA
lesions (25). In the present study, results of in vivo comet
assay showed that oral administration of TiO2 resulted in
an increase in DNA damage in the testes. These results are
in accordance with those noted by Shukla et al. (26) indicating
that TiO2 nanoparticles generate ROS and cause
DNA damage and genotoxicity in mammalian cells. The
direct association between ROS generation and oxidative
DNA damage further proposes that oxidative stress can
act as a significant path through which, TiO2 nanoparticles
cause DNA damage. Previous studies showed that TiO2
nanoparticles caused DNA injury indirectly through inflammation
(27) and generation of ROS (5).Furthermore, TiO2 nanoparticles in aqueous suspension
release free radicals which can result in DNA damage
by oxidation, nitration, methylation or deamination
reactions (28). Since TiO2 nanoparticles prompt inflammatory
reactions and DNA injury, it was suggested that
TiO2 nanoparticles act an indirect genotoxicity inducer
as suggested by Dankovic et al. (29). Previous studies
reported DNA damage caused by TiO2 nanoparticles using
in vitro (5, 16) and in vivo comet assays (30). On
the other hand, negative results were reported concerning
TiO2 nanoparticles-induced DNA damage in studies
using in vitro experiments (31) and in vivo comet assays
(32). Tao and Kobzik (33) suggested that discrepancies
among studies may be due to irregular TiO2 release, particle
size, the extent of accumulation, and incubation
circumstances, suggesting that additional studies should
be done to determine the situations in which TiO2 nanoparticles
genotoxicity arises.NAC acts as an antioxidant through expanding the synthesis
of endogenous GSH which is frequently exhausted
as a result of augmented oxidative stress (23). Additionally,
NAC performs as a direct scavenger of free radicals
(34). Together, these antioxidant activities of NAC can attribute
to guard against oxidative stresses. These results
are consistent with those mentioned in El-Kirdasy et al.
(35) study. The protective effects of NAC on testicular
damage and dysfunction, were also demonstrated by other studies (36). NAC has been shown to have significant
effects on testicular dysfunction. Consistent with the decrease
in TNF-a immunoreactivity in the current study,
Dick et al. (37) reported that NAC pretreatment stops
TNF-a production in alveolar macrophages treated with
nickel particles. Attia et al. (24) stated that co-treatment
with NAC and TiO2 restored MDA and liver cells GSH
levels. Furthermore, Xue et al. (10) detailed that NAC
powerfully repressed ROS production in TiO2-treated
cells and blocked nano-TiO2 induced lipid peroxidation,
and apoptosis. The diminished level of DNA damage in
nuclei of the testes following treatment with NAC was in
accordance with results reported by Shi et al. (38) which
showed that NAC administration suppressed the level of
TiO2 nanoparticles-induced DNA injury in human lymphocytes.
The suppressive effect of NAC on ROS formation
in cells exposed to TiO2 was also noted by Xue et
al. (10). Moreover, NAC showed significant effects on
the volume and motility of semen by increasing the antioxidant
level and reducing peroxide and oxidative stress
index when compared to the control group, in a clinical
trial. This was explained by NAC ability to diminish ROS
and reduce the viscosity of the semen (39).
Conclusion
Oral administration of TiO2 nanoparticles induced toxic
effects and DNA damage in the testes and these adverse
effects may be attributed to induction of oxidative stress.
Administration of NAC along with TiO2 nanoparticles,
protected against TiO2 damaging effect.
Authors: Robert Landsiedel; Lan Ma-Hock; Ben Van Ravenzwaay; Markus Schulz; Karin Wiench; Samantha Champ; Stefan Schulte; Wendel Wohlleben; Franz Oesch Journal: Nanotoxicology Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 5.913
Authors: Ali Cay; Ahmet Alver; Murat Küçük; Osman Işik; M Selçuk Eminağaoğlu; S Caner Karahan; Orhan Değer Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2006-01-18 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Amr A Fouad; Habib A Qureshi; Ali Ibrahim Al-Sultan; Mohamed T Yacoubi; Abdellah Abusrie Ali Journal: Toxicology Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Maged Younes; Gabriele Aquilina; Laurence Castle; Karl-Heinz Engel; Paul Fowler; Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez; Peter Fürst; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Rainer Gürtler; Trine Husøy; Melania Manco; Wim Mennes; Peter Moldeus; Sabina Passamonti; Romina Shah; Ine Waalkens-Berendsen; Detlef Wölfle; Emanuela Corsini; Francesco Cubadda; Didima De Groot; Rex FitzGerald; Sara Gunnare; Arno Christian Gutleb; Jan Mast; Alicja Mortensen; Agnes Oomen; Aldert Piersma; Veronika Plichta; Beate Ulbrich; Henk Van Loveren; Diane Benford; Margherita Bignami; Claudia Bolognesi; Riccardo Crebelli; Maria Dusinska; Francesca Marcon; Elsa Nielsen; Josef Schlatter; Christiane Vleminckx; Stefania Barmaz; Maria Carfí; Consuelo Civitella; Alessandra Giarola; Ana Maria Rincon; Rositsa Serafimova; Camilla Smeraldi; Jose Tarazona; Alexandra Tard; Matthew Wright Journal: EFSA J Date: 2021-05-06
Authors: Mohamed M A Hussein; Emad Gad; Mona M Ahmed; Ahmed H Arisha; Hasnaa F Mahdy; Ayman Abdel-Aziz Swelum; Hammed A Tukur; Islam M Saadeldin Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.223