Literature DB >> 29934714

Uroseptic Shock Can Be Reversed by Early Intervention Based on Leukocyte Count 2 h Post-operation: Animal Model and Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study.

Haiyang Wu1, Zhenghui Wang1, Shibin Zhu1, Dapang Rao2, Linyun Hu3, Ludong Qiao4, Yue Chen5, Jiajun Yan6, Xin Chen7, Shaw P Wan8, David A Schulsinger9, Gonghui Li10.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether early intervention based on leukocyte count (WBC) of less than 2.85 × 109/L obtained within 2 h post-operatively may ameliorate the uroseptic shock induced by upper urinary tract endoscopic lithotripsy (UUTEL). Urosepsis was induced in 30 rabbits and assigned to three groups: Control-I, WBC-I, and Shock-I. Control-I: Non-intervention control. WBC-I: Immediate resuscitation when there was a drastic drop of WBC within 2 h post-operatively but without signs or symptoms of shock. Shock-I: Resuscitation only when there were signs or symptoms of shock. In total, 107 patients whose WBC were less than 2.85 × 109/L within 2 h after UUTEL were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were assigned into two groups based on the time of the intervention. Shock-II included 59 patients who were started on the resuscitation bundle when there were signs or symptoms of shock. WBC-II included 48 patients who were started immediately on the resuscitation bundle when the WBC decreased drastically. All Control-I rabbits developed shock within 72 h and died. None of the WBC-I rabbits developed shock and all survived for 72 h. In total, 60% of Shock-I died within 72 h. Overall, 43 patients in Shock-II and six patients in WBC-II experienced uroseptic shock. The average lengths of hospitalization for Shock-II and WBC-II were 17.8 ± 9.7 days and 7 ± 4.2 days, respectively. Six patients in the Shock-II and none in WBC-II died of the uroseptic shock. Early intervention based on WBC measured within 2 h post-operatively might avert the uroseptic shock induced by UUTEL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic lithotripsy; initial intervention; leukocyte count; uroseptic shock

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29934714     DOI: 10.1007/s10753-018-0826-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inflammation        ISSN: 0360-3997            Impact factor:   4.092


  22 in total

1.  Pre- and Postoperative Predictors of Infection-Related Complications in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Marcelino Rivera; Boyd Viers; Patrick Cockerill; Deepak Agarwal; Ramila Mehta; Amy Krambeck
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Omer Koras; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tarik Yonguc; Tansu Degirmenci; Burak Arslan; Bulent Gunlusoy; Ozgu Aydogdu; Suleyman Minareci
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Procalcitonin Levels in Survivors and Nonsurvivors of Sepsis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shubhangi Arora; Prashant Singh; Preet Mohinder Singh; Anjan Trikha
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Complications of Flexible Ureteroscopic Treatment for Renal and Ureteral Calculi during the Learning Curve.

Authors:  Masatsugu Komori; Hirofumi Izaki; Kei Daizumoto; Megumi Tsuda; Yoshito Kusuhara; Hidehisa Mori; Junichiro Kagawa; Kunihisa Yamaguchi; Yasuyo Yamamoto; Tomoharu Fukumori; Masayuki Takahashi; Hiro-Omi Kanayama; Manabu Sakaki; Hiroyoshi Nakatsuji; Takumi Hamao; Hiroyasu Miura
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Significance of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio on predicting postoperative sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Volkan Sen; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Ozgu Aydogdu; Tarik Yonguc; Serkan Yarimoglu; Pinar Sen; Omer Koras; Tansu Degirmenci
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 7.  Epidemiology and medical management of stone disease.

Authors:  H-G Tiselius
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Clinical outcomes after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: matched pair comparison with elective ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Ramy F Youssef; Andreas Neisius; Zachariah G Goldsmith; Momin Ghaffar; Matvey Tsivian; Richard H Shin; Fernando Cabrera; Michael N Ferrandino; Charles D Scales; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Early drastic decrease in white blood count can predict uroseptic shock induced by upper urinary tract endoscopic lithotripsy: a translational study.

Authors:  Haiyang Wu; Shibin Zhu; Shicheng Yu; Guoqing Ding; Jun Xu; Tao Li; Ludong Qiao; Yue Chen; Jiajun Yan; Xin Cheng; Shaw P Wan; Gonghui Li
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Role of biomarkers in sepsis care.

Authors:  Ravi S Samraj; Basilia Zingarelli; Hector R Wong
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  2 in total

1.  Multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy as a day surgery for the treatment of complex renal stones: an initial experience.

Authors:  Huacai Zhu; Zhijian Zhao; Donglong Cheng; Xiangkun Wu; Gaoyuanzhi Yue; Yeci Lei; Zhilin Li; Guohua Zeng; Yongda Liu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The prognostic performance of Sepsis-3 and SIRS criteria for patients with urolithiasis-associated sepsis transferred to ICU following surgical interventions.

Authors:  Bowen Shi; Fei Shi; Ke Xu; Liuhui Shi; Haixiao Tang; Ning Wang; Yanyuan Wu; Jun Gu; Jie Ding; Yunteng Huang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.447

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.