| Literature DB >> 29934379 |
Xiaoling Huang1,2, Wen Chen1,2, Yanwei Lin1,2, Qi Zhang2,3, Li Ling1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between acculturation and body weight status among internal migrant children in China. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1154 pairs of migrant children aged 11-17 years and their primary caregivers in Guangzhou, China, from April to May 2016. MEASURES: Migrant children's body weight status was measured by body mass index. Acculturation was measured by a questionnaire, developed and validated by the research team. The questionnaire had three dimensions with five factors, namely language, social interaction, custom, dressing and diet. Social anxiety was measured by Social Anxiety Scale for Children. Food intake was measured by the food frequency table that was developed from a previous study. Logistic regression was performed to examine the association between acculturation and overweight/obesity while controlling for migrant children's and their caregivers' demographic characteristics, children's social anxiety and food intake.Entities:
Keywords: China; acculturation; migrant children; obesity; overweight
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29934379 PMCID: PMC6020954 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
The acculturation scale for migrant children in Guangzhou, China, in 2016*
| Dimension | Factor | Item | Valuation |
| Language | Language | (1) Can you understand Cantonese? | 1=don’t understand completely; 2=understand partly; 3=understand mostly; 4=fully understand. |
| (2) How about do you speak Cantonese? | 1=can’t; 2=not well; 3=better; | ||
| (3) Did you watch Cantonese TV show? | 1=never; 2=once in a while; 3=sometimes; 4=often. | ||
| 4) Did you listen to the Cantonese songs? | 1=never; 2=once in a while; 3=sometimes; 4=often. | ||
| Social interaction | Social interaction | (1) Where did your good friends come from? | 1=most of them were non-local friends; 2=half were non-local friends and half were local friends; 3=most of them were local friends. |
| (2) If it is up to you, where do you hope your classmates come from? | |||
| Preferences in life | Custom | (1) If it is up to you, would you like to go to hometown for the Spring Festival? | 1=yes, I would; 2=it doesn’t matter; 3=no, I would not. |
| (2) If it is up to you, do you hope how to spend the Spring Festival? | 1=completely in way of hometown; 2=most of way like hometown; 3=half like hometown and half like Guangzhou; 4=most of way like Guangzhou; 5=completely in way of Guangzhou. | ||
| Dressing | (1) Compared with your hometown, do you think people’s dressing in Guangzhou is good looking? | 1=not good looking; 2=no difference/unaware; 3=good looking. | |
| (2) If it’s up to you, what kind of dressing do you wear? | 1=completely in way of hometown; 2=most of way like hometown; 3=half like hometown and half like Guangzhou; 4=most of way like Guangzhou; 5=completely in way of Guangzhou. | ||
| Diet | (1) What kind of food do you usually eat? | 1=all dishes like hometown; 2=most of dishes like hometown; 3=half like hometown and half like Guangzhou; 4=most of dishes like Guangzhou; 5=all dishes like Guangzhou. | |
| (2) What kind of dishes do you like? | 1=hometown dishes; 2=local dishes; 3=foreigner dishes. |
*The Cronbach’s alpha of reliability analysis on the acculturation scale for children was 0.70.
Characteristics of 1154 migrant children and their primary caregivers in Guangzhou, China, in 2016
| Characteristic | Overweight/obesity | ||
| No† | Yes‡ | Total | |
| Children’s characteristic | |||
| Gender (n=1154), n (%) | |||
| Male | 566 (87.5) | 81 (12.5) | 647 (56.1)*** |
| Female | 476 (93.9) | 31 (6.1) | 507 (43.9) |
| Age (n=1154) (years), mean±SD | 13.8±0.9 | 13.4±0.9 | 13.7±0.9*** |
| 11–13, n (%) | 410 (86.1) | 66 (13.9) | 476 (41.2) |
| 14–17, n (%) | 632 (93.2) | 46 (6.8) | 678 (58.8) |
| Years of residence in Guangzhou (n=1103), n (%) | |||
| <6 | 238 (91.5) | 22 (8.5) | 260 (23.6) |
| 6–10 | 289 (91.2) | 28 (8.8) | 317 (28.7) |
| 11–16 | 470 (89.4) | 56 (10.6) | 526 (47.7) |
| Social Anxiety Scale for Children (n=1108), mean±SD | 14.2±3.9 | 14.5±3.9 | 14.2±3.9 |
| Fear of negative evaluation | 8.5±2.6 | 8.6±2.5 | 8.5±2.6 |
| Social avoidance and distress | 5.7±1.9 | 5.9±1.8 | 5.7±1.9 |
| Food intake (n=1131), mean±SD | 67.1±21.9 | 66.4±22.5 | 67.0±21.0 |
| Carbohydrate-based food | 14.9±3.7 | 14.5±4.1 | 14.9±3.7 |
| Animal food | 29.7±13.6 | 29.4±14.4 | 29.7±13.7 |
| Milk, beans and products | 14.0±6.9 | 14.3±6.8 | 14.1±6.9 |
| Vegetables and fruits | 8.5±1.6 | 8.3±2.0 | 8.4±1.6 |
| Primary caregivers’ characteristic | |||
| Caregivers’ education (n=1100), n (%) | |||
| Primary school and below (<grade 6) | 151 (92.1) | 13 (7.9) | 164 (14.9) |
| Middle school (grades 7–9) | 573 (90.5) | 60 (9.5) | 633 (57.5) |
| High/vocational school (grades 10–12) | 218 (90.0) | 27 (11.0) | 245 (22.3) |
| Junior college and above (grade 12–) | 53 (91.4) | 5 (8.6) | 58 (5.3) |
| Caregivers’ type of migration (n=1140), n (%) | |||
| Rural-to-urban migration | 872 (91.3) | 83 (8.7) | 955 (83.8)* |
| Urban-to-urban migration | 158 (85.4) | 27 (14.6) | 185 (16.2) |
| Household monthly income per person (n=1140), n (%) | |||
| ≤3500 RMB | 259 (90.9) | 26 (9.1) | 285 (25.0) |
| 3501–5000 RMB | 306 (87.9) | 42 (12.1) | 348 (30.5) |
| 5001–8000 RMB | 225 (90.4) | 24 (9.6) | 249 (21.8) |
| ≥8001 RMB | 240 (93.0) | 18 (7.0) | 258 (22.7) |
| Number of children in family (n=1133), n (%) | |||
| 1 | 121 (87.7) | 17 (12.3) | 138 (12.2) |
| 2 | 459 (89.6) | 53 (10.4) | 512 (45.2) |
| ≥3 | 445 (92.1) | 38 (7.9) | 483 (42.6) |
Comparison the prevalence of overweight/obesity between different subgroups of each categorical variable. *P<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
†BMI: mean=17.8, SD=2.1.
‡BMI: mean=25.0, SD=3.0.
BMI, body mass index.
Acculturation score and scores of dimensions and factors of acculturation among 1154 migrant children in Guangzhou, China, in 2016
| Acculturation | Overweight/obesity, mean±SD |
|
| ||
| No | Yes | Total | |||
| Acculturation | 42.0±14.7 | 39.4±13.5 | 41.8±14.6 | 0.067 | − |
| Language | 48.3±22.2 | 44.7±23.4 | 47.9±22.3 | 0.095 | − |
| Social interaction | 42.4±21.4 | 42.8±20.4 | 42.4±21.3 | 0.607 | − |
| Preferences in life | 47.5±14.0 | 45.6±12.4 | 47.3±13.9 | 0.294 | − |
| Custom | 27.6±19.2 | 27.1±18.9 | 27.6±19.2 | 0.852 | − |
| Dressing | 61.9±16.7 | 59.9±15.8 | 61.7±16.6 | 0.194 | − |
| Diet | 45.2±18.4 | 43.6±19.6 | 45.0±18.5 | 0.483 | − |
| Differences between dimensions ( | |||||
| Language: social interaction | 5.9±30.6 | 1.9±30.7 | 5.5±30.6 | 0.207 | <0.001 |
| Language: preferences in life | 0.8±26.0 | −0.9±27.5 | 0.6±23.2 | 0.414 | 0.430 |
| Preferences in life: social interaction | 5.1±25.5 | 2.8±24.6 | 4.9±25.4 | 0.390 | <0.001 |
| Differences between factors ( | |||||
| Language: social interaction | 5.9±30.6 | 1.9±30.7 | 5.5±30.6 | 0.207 | <0.001 |
| Language: custom | 20.6±29.5 | 17.6±29.8 | 20.3±29.6 | 0.222 | <0.001 |
| Language: dressing | −13.6±27.7 | −15.2±28.1 | −13.7±27.7 | 0.547 | <0.001 |
| Language: diet | 3.1±28.4 | 1.1±33.0 | 2.9±28.8 | 0.544 | 0.001 |
| Social interaction: custom | 14.7±28.7 | 15.7±28.8 | 14.8±28.7 | 0.804 | <0.001 |
| Social interaction: dressing | −19.5±27.1 | −17.1±25.4 | −19.3±26.9 | 0.330 | <0.001 |
| Social interaction: diet | −2.8±28.2 | −0.8±29.1 | −2.6±28.3 | 0.546 | 0.003 |
| Custom: dressing | −34.2±25.3 | −32.8±25.6 | −34.1±25.3 | 0.575 | <0.001 |
| Custom: diet | −17.5±26.6 | −16.5±27.8 | −17.4±26.7 | 0.845 | <0.001 |
| Dressing: diet | 16.7±24.8 | 16.3±27.4 | 16.6±25.1 | 0.761 | <0.001 |
P 1 is the significance of the comparison between overweight/obesity migrant children and normal weight migrant children.
P 2 is the significance of pairwise comparisons among dimensions or factors of acculturation. Bonferroni was used to adjust α (α′) to pairwise compare.
Logistic model on the association between acculturation and overweight/obesity among 1154 migrant children in Guangzhou, China, 2016
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
| OR (95% CI) | P values | aOR (95% CI) | P values | |
| Acculturation | 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) | 0.078 | 0.98 (0.97 to 1.00) | 0.030 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male (reference) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Female | 0.46 (0.30 to 0.70) | <0.001 | 0.43 (0.25 to 0.74) | 0.002 |
| Age (years) | ||||
| 11–13 (reference) | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14–17 | 0.45 (0.30 to 0.67) | <0.001 | 0.41 (0.25 to 0.66) | <0.001 |
| Caregivers’ type of migration | ||||
| Rural-to-urban migration (reference) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Urban-to-urban migration | 1.80 (1.13 to 2.86) | 0.014 | 2.07 (1.16 to 3.69) | 0.014 |
| Years of residence in Guangzhou | 1.15 (0.89 to 1.48) | 0.287 | 1.25 (0.91 to 1.73) | 0.166 |
| Fear of negative evaluation | 1.01 (0.94 to 1.09) | 0.743 | 0.95 (0.85 to 1.05) | 0.306 |
| Social avoidance and distress | 1.07 (0.96 to 1.20) | 0.216 | 1.12 (0.96 to 1.30) | 0.149 |
| Carbohydrate based food | 0.97 (0.92 to 1.03) | 0.298 | 0.95 (0.88 to 1.02) | 0.145 |
| Animal food | 1.00 (0.98 to 1.01) | 0.798 | 0.99 (0.97 to 1.02) | 0.602 |
| Milk to beans and products | 1.01 (0.98 to 1.03) | 0.749 | 1.02 (0.98 to 1.07) | 0.312 |
| Vegetables and fruits | 0.94 (0.84 to 1.05) | 0.283 | 0.91 (0.78 to 1.06) | 0.225 |
| Caregivers’ education | 1.10 (0.84 to 1.44) | 0.473 | 0.99 (0.71 to 1.38) | 0.951 |
| Household monthly income per person | 0.90 (0.75 to 1.08) | 0.259 | 0.89 (0.71 to 1.12) | 0.330 |
| Number of children in family | 0.77 (0.58 to 1.03) | 0.076 | 1.06 (0.74 to 1.52) | 0.755 |
Model 1 was a bivariate logistic regression model. Model 2 was a multivariate logistic model adjusted for gender, age, years of residence in Guangzhou, caregivers’ education, caregivers’ type of migration, household monthly income per person, number of children in family, FNE, SAD and four categories of food intake.
The interaction effect between acculturation and migrant children’s gender/caregiver’s type of migration were not significant. The model with the interaction was not reported in the table 4.
aOR, adjusted OR; FNE, fear of negative evaluation; SAD, social avoidance and distress.