Literature DB >> 29934248

Altered selection during language processing in individuals at high risk for psychosis.

Teresa Vargas1, Hannah Snyder2, Marie Banich3, Rae Newberry3, Stewart A Shankman4, Gregory P Strauss5, Vijay Anand Mittal6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Performance in the executive function (EF) domain has been linked to symptoms and functional outcomes in psychosis. Studies have found that UHR populations have difficulty with verbal fluency, which involves multiple facets of EF. Two potentially implicated EF facets were examined to explore whether these could be dissociated in UHR populations: selection among alternatives (measured by selection costs) and retrieval from semantic memory retrieval (measured by retrieval costs).
METHODS: A total of 45 UHR individuals and 46 healthy controls (HVs) were assessed with a verb generation task. Differences in selection cost (RT difference between high and low selection demand conditions) and retrieval cost (RT difference between high and low retrieval demand conditions) were examined and participants were also assessed for clinical symptoms.
RESULTS: The UHR group showed greater selection costs relative to HVs, F (1, 91) = 4.39, p = 0.039. However, there were no group differences on retrieval cost, F (1, 91) = 0.63, p = 0.43. A positive association (r = 0.41) was found between disorganized and negative symptoms and selection costs (but not retrieval costs) in the UHR group. There was no significant association between selection costs and positive symptoms. DISCUSSION: Increased selection costs may reflect impaired performance in the neural inhibition domain of EF in the UHR population, potentially underlying a mechanistically distinct EF subdomain that affects the group's ability to efficiently select between competing options. Findings suggest that UHR individuals may exhibit impairment in selecting among alternatives, but not in retrieval from semantic memory.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Executive function; High risk; Psychosis; Selection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29934248      PMCID: PMC6289728          DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  51 in total

1.  From paragraph to graph: latent semantic analysis for information visualization.

Authors:  Thomas K Landauer; Darrell Laham; Marcia Derr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A practical prototypic system for psychiatric diagnosis: the ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines.

Authors:  Michael B First
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions.

Authors:  Tara A Niendam; Angela R Laird; Kimberly L Ray; Y Monica Dean; David C Glahn; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The Beck Anxiety Inventory: reexamination of factor structure and psychometric properties.

Authors:  A Osman; B A Kopper; F X Barrios; J R Osman; T Wade
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-01

5.  Social cognition and neurocognition as predictors of conversion to psychosis in individuals at ultra-high risk.

Authors:  Hee Sun Kim; Na Young Shin; Joon Hwan Jang; Euitae Kim; Geumsook Shim; Hye Yoon Park; Kyung Sue Hong; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Letter and category fluency in schizophrenic patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christina E Bokat; Terry E Goldberg
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Individual differences in the balance of GABA to glutamate in pFC predict the ability to select among competing options.

Authors:  Alejandro de la Vega; Mark S Brown; Hannah R Snyder; Debra Singel; Yuko Munakata; Marie T Banich
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The initial prodrome of schizophrenia: different duration, different underlying deficits?

Authors:  Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Stephan Ruhrmann; Carolin Hoyer; Joachim Klosterkötter; F Markus Leweke
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 3.735

9.  Challenges and Opportunities in Studies of Cognition in the Prodrome to Psychosis: No Detail Is Too Small.

Authors:  Abraham Reichenberg; Josephine Mollon
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 10.  Neuroimaging studies of GABA in schizophrenia: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Egerton; G Modinos; D Ferrera; P McGuire
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  1 in total

1.  Associations between symptom and neurocognitive dimensions in clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Ingvild Aase; Johannes H Langeveld; Inge Joa; Jan Olav Johannessen; Ingvild Dalen; Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad
Journal:  Schizophr Res Cogn       Date:  2022-06-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.