Literature DB >> 29933169

Six subphenotypes in septic shock: Latent class analysis of the PROWESS Shock study.

Bengt Gårdlund1, Natalia O Dmitrieva2, Carl F Pieper3, Simon Finfer4, John C Marshall5, B Taylor Thompson6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Septic shock is a highly heterogeneous condition which is part of the challenge in its diagnosis and treatment. In this study we aim to identify clinically relevant subphenotypes of septic shock using a novel statistic al approach.
METHODS: Baseline patient data from a large global clinical trial of septic shock (n = 1696) was analysed using latent class analysis (LCA). This approach allowed investigators to identify subgroups in a heterogeneous population by estimating a categorical latent variable that detects relatively homogeneous subgroups within a complex phenomenon.
RESULTS: LCA identified six different, clinically meaningful subphenotypes of septic shock each with a typical profile: (1) "Uncomplicated Septic Shock, (2) "Pneumonia with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)", (3) "Postoperative Abdominal", (4) "Severe Septic Shock", (5): "Pneumonia with ARDS and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS)", (6) "Late Septic Shock". The 6-class solution showed high entropy approaching 1 (i.e., 0.92), indicating there was excellent separation between estimated classes.
CONCLUSIONS: LCA appears to be an applicable statistical tool in analysing a heterogenous clinical cohort of septic shock. The results may lead to a better understanding of septic shock complexity and form a basis for considering targeted therapies and selecting patients for future clinical trials.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical illness; Intensive care; Latent class analysis; Sepsis; Septic shock; Subphenotypes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29933169     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  17 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence in intensive care: are we there yet?

Authors:  Matthieu Komorowski
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Septic Shock: Phenotypes and Outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandre Cereuil; Romain Ronflé; Aurélien Culver; Mohamed Boucekine; Laurent Papazian; Laurent Lefebvre; Marc Leone
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.070

3.  Identification of Trajectory-Based Acute Kidney Injury Phenotypes Among Cardiac Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Andrew; Carl F Pieper; Anne D Cherry; Jane F Pendergast; Jamie R Privratsky; Joseph P Mathew; Mark Stafford-Smith
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.102

4.  A neutrophil subset defined by intracellular olfactomedin 4 is associated with mortality in sepsis.

Authors:  Kirsten N Kangelaris; Regina Clemens; Xiaohui Fang; Alejandra Jauregui; Tom Liu; Kathryn Vessel; Thomas Deiss; Pratik Sinha; Aleksandra Leligdowicz; Kathleen D Liu; Hanjing Zhuo; Matthew N Alder; Hector R Wong; Carolyn S Calfee; Clifford Lowell; Michael A Matthay
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 5.  Prognostic and predictive enrichment in sepsis.

Authors:  Natalja L Stanski; Hector R Wong
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  COVID-19 Clinical Phenotypes: Presentation and Temporal Progression of Disease in a Cohort of Hospitalized Adults in Georgia, United States.

Authors:  Juliana F da Silva; Alfonso C Hernandez-Romieu; Sean D Browning; Beau B Bruce; Pavithra Natarajan; Sapna B Morris; Jeremy A W Gold; Robyn Neblett Fanfair; Jessica Rogers-Brown; John Rossow; Christine M Szablewski; Nadine Oosmanally; Melissa Tobin D'Angelo; Cherie Drenzek; David J Murphy; Julie Hollberg; James M Blum; Robert Jansen; David W Wright; William Sewell; Jack Owens; Benjamin Lefkove; Frank W Brown; Deron C Burton; Timothy M Uyeki; Priti R Patel; Brendan R Jackson; Karen K Wong
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.835

7.  Bacteremic sepsis leads to higher mortality when adjusting for confounders with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Lisa Mellhammar; Fredrik Kahn; Caroline Whitlow; Thomas Kander; Bertil Christensson; Adam Linder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  ARDS Subphenotypes: Understanding a Heterogeneous Syndrome.

Authors:  Jennifer G Wilson; Carolyn S Calfee
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Individualized fluid administration for critically ill patients with sepsis with an interpretable dynamic treatment regimen model.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Bin Zheng; Nan Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Individualized resuscitation strategy for septic shock formalized by finite mixture modeling and dynamic treatment regimen.

Authors:  Penglin Ma; Jingtao Liu; Feng Shen; Xuelian Liao; Ming Xiu; Heling Zhao; Mingyan Zhao; Jing Xie; Peng Wang; Man Huang; Tong Li; Meili Duan; Kejian Qian; Yue Peng; Feihu Zhou; Xin Xin; Xianyao Wan; ZongYu Wang; Shusheng Li; Jianwei Han; Zhenliang Li; Guolei Ding; Qun Deng; Jicheng Zhang; Yue Zhu; Wenjing Ma; Jingwen Wang; Yan Kang; Zhongheng Zhang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.