Literature DB >> 29932934

Mapping the transmission risk of Zika virus using machine learning models.

Dong Jiang1, Mengmeng Hao2, Fangyu Ding3, Jingying Fu4, Meng Li5.   

Abstract

Zika virus, which has been linked to severe congenital abnormalities, is exacerbating global public health problems with its rapid transnational expansion fueled by increased global travel and trade. Suitability mapping of the transmission risk of Zika virus is essential for drafting public health plans and disease control strategies, which are especially important in areas where medical resources are relatively scarce. Predicting the risk of Zika virus outbreak has been studied in recent years, but the published literature rarely includes multiple model comparisons or predictive uncertainty analysis. Here, three relatively popular machine learning models including backward propagation neural network (BPNN), gradient boosting machine (GBM) and random forest (RF) were adopted to map the probability of Zika epidemic outbreak at the global level, pairing high-dimensional multidisciplinary covariate layers with comprehensive location data on recorded Zika virus infection in humans. The results show that the predicted high-risk areas for Zika transmission are concentrated in four regions: Southeastern North America, Eastern South America, Central Africa and Eastern Asia. To evaluate the performance of machine learning models, the 50 modeling processes were conducted based on a training dataset. The BPNN model obtained the highest predictive accuracy with a 10-fold cross-validation area under the curve (AUC) of 0.966 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.965-0.967], followed by the GBM model (10-fold cross-validation AUC = 0.964[0.963-0.965]) and the RF model (10-fold cross-validation AUC = 0.963[0.962-0.964]). Based on training samples, compared with the BPNN-based model, we find that significant differences (p = 0.0258* and p = 0.0001***, respectively) are observed for prediction accuracies achieved by the GBM and RF models. Importantly, the prediction uncertainty introduced by the selection of absence data was quantified and could provide more accurate fundamental and scientific information for further study on disease transmission prediction and risk assessment.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; Prediction uncertainty; Significant differences; Transmission risk; Zika virus

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29932934     DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


  15 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence: Review of Current and Future Applications in Medicine.

Authors:  L Brannon Thomas; Stephen M Mastorides; Narayan A Viswanadhan; Colleen E Jakey; Andrew A Borkowski
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-11

2.  Temporal and Spatiotemporal Arboviruses Forecasting by Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Clarisse Lins de Lima; Ana Clara Gomes da Silva; Giselle Machado Magalhães Moreno; Cecilia Cordeiro da Silva; Anwar Musah; Aisha Aldosery; Livia Dutra; Tercio Ambrizzi; Iuri V G Borges; Merve Tunali; Selma Basibuyuk; Orhan Yenigün; Tiago Lima Massoni; Ella Browning; Kate Jones; Luiza Campos; Patty Kostkova; Abel Guilhermino da Silva Filho; Wellington Pinheiro Dos Santos
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  Early prediction of coronavirus disease epidemic severity in the contiguous United States based on deep learning.

Authors:  I-Hsi Kao; Jau-Woei Perng
Journal:  Results Phys       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.476

4.  Artificial intelligence and medical education: A global mixed-methods study of medical students' perspectives.

Authors:  Hamza Ejaz; Hari McGrath; Brian Lh Wong; Andrew Guise; Tom Vercauteren; Jonathan Shapey
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  Assessment of the outbreak risk, mapping and infection behavior of COVID-19: Application of the autoregressive integrated-moving average (ARIMA) and polynomial models.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Pourghasemi; Soheila Pouyan; Zakariya Farajzadeh; Nitheshnirmal Sadhasivam; Bahram Heidari; Sedigheh Babaei; John P Tiefenbacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A dynamic neural network model for predicting risk of Zika in real time.

Authors:  Mahmood Akhtar; Moritz U G Kraemer; Lauren M Gardner
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 7.  The roles of machine learning methods in limiting the spread of deadly diseases: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rayner Alfred; Joe Henry Obit
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-23

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence and the future of global health.

Authors:  Nina Schwalbe; Brian Wahl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Utility of Artificial Intelligence Amidst the COVID 19 Pandemic: A Review.

Authors:  Agam Bansal; Rana Prathap Padappayil; Chandan Garg; Anjali Singal; Mohak Gupta; Allan Klein
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Identifying high risk areas of Zika virus infection by meteorological factors in Colombia.

Authors:  Lung-Chang Chien; Francisco Sy; Adriana Pérez
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.