Literature DB >> 29932447

European In-Situ Snow Measurements: Practices and Purposes.

Roberta Pirazzini1, Leena Leppänen2, Ghislain Picard3, Juan Ignacio Lopez-Moreno4, Christoph Marty5, Giovanni Macelloni6, Anna Kontu7, Annakaisa von Lerber8, Cemal Melih Tanis9, Martin Schneebeli10, Patricia de Rosnay11, Ali Nadir Arslan12.   

Abstract

In-situ snow measurements conducted by European institutions for operational, research, and energy business applications were surveyed in the framework of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action ES1404, called "A European network for a harmonised monitoring of snow for the benefit of climate change scenarios, hydrology, and numerical weather prediction". Here we present the results of this survey, which was answered by 125 participants from 99 operational and research institutions, belonging to 38 European countries. The typologies of environments where the snow measurements are performed range from mountain to low elevated plains, including forests, bogs, tundra, urban areas, glaciers, lake ice, and sea ice. Of the respondents, 93% measure snow macrophysical parameters, such as snow presence, snow depth (HS), snow water equivalent (SWE), and snow density. These describe the bulk characteristics of the whole snowpack or of a snow layer, and they are the primary snow properties that are needed for most operational applications (such as hydrological monitoring, avalanche forecast, and weather forecast). In most cases, these measurements are done with manual methods, although for snow presence, HS, and SWE, automatized methods are also applied by some respondents. Parameters characterizing precipitating and suspended snow (such as the height of new snow, precipitation intensity, flux of drifting/blowing snow, and particle size distribution), some of which are crucial for the operational services, are measured by 74% of the respondents. Parameters characterizing the snow microstructural properties (such as the snow grain size and shape, and specific surface area), the snow electromagnetic properties (such as albedo, brightness temperature, and backscatter), and the snow composition (such as impurities and isotopes) are measured by 41%, 26%, and 13% of the respondents, respectively, mostly for research applications. The results of this survey are discussed from the perspective of the need of enhancing the efficiency and coverage of the in-situ observational network applying automatic and cheap measurement methods. Moreover, recommendations for the enhancement and harmonization of the observational network and measurement practices are provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  in-situ measurements; instruments; snow properties

Year:  2018        PMID: 29932447      PMCID: PMC6068717          DOI: 10.3390/s18072016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  5 in total

1.  Specific surface area of snow samples determined by CH4 adsorption at 77 K and estimated by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  F Dominé; A Cabanes; A S Taillandier; L Legagneux
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Retrieval of snow physical parameters using a ground-based spectral radiometer.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Kuchiki; Teruo Aoki; Tomonori Tanikawa; Yuji Kodama
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Snow-sensing fleet to unlock water's icy secrets.

Authors:  Alexandra Witze
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Changing Arctic snow cover: A review of recent developments and assessment of future needs for observations, modelling, and impacts.

Authors:  Stef Bokhorst; Stine Højlund Pedersen; Ludovic Brucker; Oleg Anisimov; Jarle W Bjerke; Ross D Brown; Dorothee Ehrich; Richard L H Essery; Achim Heilig; Susanne Ingvander; Cecilia Johansson; Margareta Johansson; Ingibjörg Svala Jónsdóttir; Niila Inga; Kari Luojus; Giovanni Macelloni; Heather Mariash; Donald McLennan; Gunhild Ninis Rosqvist; Atsushi Sato; Hannele Savela; Martin Schneebeli; Aleksandr Sokolov; Sergey A Sokratov; Silvia Terzago; Dagrun Vikhamar-Schuler; Scott Williamson; Yubao Qiu; Terry V Callaghan
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  A Critical Evaluation of Interlaboratory Data on Total, Elemental, and Isotopic Carbon in the Carbonaceous Particle Reference Material, NIST SRM 1649a.

Authors:  L A Currie; B A Benner; J D Kessler; D B Klinedinst; G A Klouda; J V Marolf; J F Slater; S A Wise; H Cachier; R Cary; J C Chow; J Watson; E R M Druffel; C A Masiello; T I Eglinton; A Pearson; C M Reddy; Ö Gustafsson; J G Quinn; P C Hartmann; J I Hedges; K M Prentice; T W Kirchstetter; T Novakow; H Puxbaum; H Schmid
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2002-06-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.