Carol Sukhn1, Johnny Awwad2, Akram Ghantous3, Ghazi Zaatari4. 1. Environment Core Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 3. Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 4. Environment Core Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon. zaatari@aub.edu.lb.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human exposure to environmental pollutants is widespread. It was suggested that exposure to non-essential heavy metals may adversely affect semen development in men. PURPOSE: To evaluate associations between non-essential heavy metals in blood and seminal fluid and semen quality parameters in men. METHODS: Male partners of heterosexual couples were included. The following elements were measured in blood and seminal fluid: lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), barium (Ba), mercury (Hg), and uranium (U) using ion-coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. SETTING: The fertility clinic at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Semen quality parameters (volume, concentration, total count, progressive motility, viability, and normal morphology). RESULTS: We found that participants with low-quality semen had significantly higher Cd and Ba concentrations in the seminal fluid than participants with normal-quality semen. We also observed significant associations between low sperm viability and higher blood Cd and Ba, as well as higher seminal Pb, Cd, Ba, and U. Furthermore, U concentrations in the seminal fluid were associated with increased odds ratios for below-reference progressive sperm motility and normal morphology. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental exposures to Pb, Cd, Ba, and U appear to adversely influence sperm development in men. In non-occupationally exposed men, measurements of heavy metals in the seminal fluid may be more predictive of below-reference sperm quality parameters than in blood.
BACKGROUND:Human exposure to environmental pollutants is widespread. It was suggested that exposure to non-essential heavy metals may adversely affect semen development in men. PURPOSE: To evaluate associations between non-essential heavy metals in blood and seminal fluid and semen quality parameters in men. METHODS: Male partners of heterosexual couples were included. The following elements were measured in blood and seminal fluid: lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), barium (Ba), mercury (Hg), and uranium (U) using ion-coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. SETTING: The fertility clinic at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Semen quality parameters (volume, concentration, total count, progressive motility, viability, and normal morphology). RESULTS: We found that participants with low-quality semen had significantly higher Cd and Ba concentrations in the seminal fluid than participants with normal-quality semen. We also observed significant associations between low sperm viability and higher blood Cd and Ba, as well as higher seminal Pb, Cd, Ba, and U. Furthermore, U concentrations in the seminal fluid were associated with increased odds ratios for below-reference progressive sperm motility and normal morphology. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental exposures to Pb, Cd, Ba, and U appear to adversely influence sperm development in men. In non-occupationally exposed men, measurements of heavy metals in the seminal fluid may be more predictive of below-reference sperm quality parameters than in blood.
Entities:
Keywords:
Environmental pollution; Male infertility; Non-essential heavy metals; Semen quality
Authors: Trevor G Cooper; Elizabeth Noonan; Sigrid von Eckardstein; Jacques Auger; H W Gordon Baker; Hermann M Behre; Trine B Haugen; Thinus Kruger; Christina Wang; Michael T Mbizvo; Kirsten M Vogelsong Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 15.610
Authors: Niraj Pant; A B Pant; P K Chaturvedi; M Shukla; N Mathur; Y K Gupta; D K Saxena Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Jaime Mendiola; José M Moreno; Manuela Roca; Nuria Vergara-Juárez; María J Martínez-García; Antonio García-Sánchez; Belén Elvira-Rendueles; Stella Moreno-Grau; José J López-Espín; Jorge Ten; Rafael Bernabeu; Alberto M Torres-Cantero Journal: Environ Health Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Paige L Williams; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Susan A Korrick; Mary M Lee; Bora Plaku-Alakbarova; Jane S Burns; Luidmila Smigulina; Yury Dikov; Ramy Abou Ghayda; Russ Hauser; Oleg Sergeyev Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Aldo Di Nunzio; Antonella Giarra; Maria Toscanesi; Angela Amoresano; Marina Piscopo; Elisabetta Ceretti; Claudia Zani; Stefano Lorenzetti; Marco Trifuoggi; Luigi Montano Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 4.614