Literature DB >> 29931281

Characteristics and outcomes of emergency interhospital transfers from subacute to acute care for clinical deterioration.

Julie Considine1,2, Maryann Street1,2, Tracey Bucknall1,3, Helen Rawson1,4, Anastasia F Hutchison1,5, Trisha Dunning1,6, Mari Botti1,5, Maxine M Duke1,7, Mohammadreza Mohebbi8, Alison M Hutchinson1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics and outcomes of emergency interhospital transfers from subacute to acute hospital care and develop an internally validated predictive model to identify features associated with high risk of emergency interhospital transfer.
DESIGN: Prospective case-time-control study.
SETTING: Acute and subacute healthcare facilities from five health services in Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Cases were patients with an emergency interhospital transfer from subacute to acute hospital care. For every case, two inpatients from the same subacute care ward on the same day of emergency transfer were randomly selected as controls. Admission episode was the unit of measurement and data were collected prospectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and admission characteristics, transfer characteristics and outcomes (cases), serious adverse events and mortality.
RESULTS: Data were collected for 603 transfers in 557 patients and 1160 control patients. Cases were significantly more likely to be male, born in a non-English speaking country, have lower functional independence, more frequent vital sign assessments and experience a serious adverse event during first acute care or subacute care admissions. When adjusted for health service, cases had significantly higher inpatient mortality, were more likely to have unplanned intensive care unit admissions and rapid response team calls during their entire hospital admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who require an emergency interhospital transfer from subacute to acute hospital care have hospital admission rates and in-hospital mortality. Clinical instability during the first acute care admission (serious adverse events or increased surveillance) may prompt reassessment of patient suitability for movement to a separate subacute care hospital.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse events < patient safety; elderly < specific populations; mortality) < measurement of quality; patient outcomes (health status; quality of life; readmissions < complications; risk management < patient safety

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29931281     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  3 in total

Review 1.  Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards.

Authors:  Jennifer McGaughey; Dean A Fergusson; Peter Van Bogaert; Louise Rose
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-22

2.  Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in long-term care facilities for people with epilepsy.

Authors:  Simona Balestrini; Matthias J Koepp; Sonia Gandhi; Hannah M Rickman; Gee Yen Shin; Catherine F Houlihan; Jonny Anders-Cannon; Katri Silvennoinen; Fenglai Xiao; Sara Zagaglia; Kirsty Hudgell; Mariusz Ziomek; Paul Haimes; Adam Sampson; Annie Parker; J Helen Cross; Rosemarie Pardington; Eleni Nastouli; Charles Swanton; Josemir W Sander; Sanjay M Sisodiya
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.937

3.  Nursing homes and COVID-19: We can and should do better.

Authors:  Patricia M Davidson; Sarah L Szanton
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.036

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.