| Literature DB >> 29930975 |
Richard T Waldron1,2, Hsin-Yuan Su1, Honit Piplani1, Joseph Capri3, Whitaker Cohn3, Julian P Whitelegge3, Kym F Faull3, Sugunadevi Sakkiah1, Ravinder Abrol1, Wei Yang1, Bo Zhou1, Michael R Freeman1,2, Stephen J Pandol1,2, Aurelia Lugea1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Heavy alcohol drinking is associated with pancreatitis, whereas moderate intake lowers the risk. Mice fed ethanol long term show no pancreas damage unless adaptive/protective responses mediating proteostasis are disrupted. Pancreatic acini synthesize digestive enzymes (largely serine hydrolases) in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where perturbations (eg, alcohol consumption) activate adaptive unfolded protein responses orchestrated by spliced X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1). Here, we examined ethanol-induced early structural changes in pancreatic ER proteins.Entities:
Keywords: %-ox, percentage oxidized; ATPase, adenosine triphosphatase; Alcohol Pancreatitis; Carboxyl Ester Lipase; Cel, carboxyl ester lipase; DTT, dithiothreitol; Disulfide Bond; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ERAD, endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation; FAEE, fatty acid ethyl esters; FP, fluorophosphonate; ICAT, isotope-coded affinity tags; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; MW, molecular weight; RER, rough ER; UPR, unfolded protein response; Unfolded Protein Response; WT, wild type; sXBP1, spliced X box-binding protein 1
Year: 2018 PMID: 29930975 PMCID: PMC6009017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.01.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2352-345X
Figure 7The pancreatic ER proteome. WT and Xbp1+/- mice were fed control (con) or ethanol (EtOH) diet for 5–6 weeks. At the end of the feeding period, pancreata were harvested and proteomic analysis was performed on ER fractions. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlap in proteins associated with each experimental group. (B) Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the shared genes between all 4 groups. The major Gene ontology terms of Biological Processes and Gene Functions and KEGG pathways are shown according to log10 of the P value. (C) Model depicting protein folding and packaging, mediated by chaperones and oxidoreductases. Ethanol promotes a pathway for which protective modifications and oxidative/nitrosative (putative signaling modifications) exist and damage ultimately occurs, leading to protein aggregation and degradation. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
Figure 4Changes in pancreas ER protein levels shown by proteomic data. In-gel digests were performed to identify FP-desthiobiotin–labeled peptides (shown in Supplementary Table 4), and many unlabeled proteins, as described in the Results and Materials and Methods sections. Spectral counts of all unmodified proteins identified in flow-through of the OXICAT experiment (see Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 for modified peptides) also were incorporated into this analysis. (A) Spectral counts of combined Xbp1+/- vs WT mice pancreas ER proteins were quantitated label-free by spectral counting (shown in Supplementary Table 5) and subjected to DAVID analysis to identify gene ontology changes. (B) Spectral counts of combined ethanol- vs control-fed mice pancreas ER proteins were quantitated by spectral counting (shown in Supplementary Table 6) and subjected to DAVID analysis. (C) Gene ontologic changes obtained by comparison of ethanol-fed Xbp1+/- with ethanol-fed WT mice by spectral counting and DAVID analysis. (D) Cytoscape interaction network. An interaction network was established among 6 ER stress response proteins significantly increased in ethanol-fed Xbp1+/- vs ethanol-fed WT mice (P4hb, Pdia3, Pdia4, Pdia6, Sel1l, and Eef2), within the context of the larger network of compared proteins obtained by LC-MS/MS. Legends show the fold-change of each protein as a color range from green (decreased) to red (increased), and by a range of text sizes from small (decreased) to large (increased). GTP, guanosine triphosphate; SRP, signal recognition particle; tRNA, transfer RNA.
Figure 1Study design. EtOH, ethanol diet; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Figure 2Comparison of %-ox proteins by mouse genotype and diet. (A) Data of %-ox proteins were compared between ER proteome samples obtained from WT and Xbp1+/- mice fed control or ethanol (EtOH) diet. Average ratios of Xbp1+/- to WT were computed and log10 values were plotted vs peptide number for each peptide detected at least 3 times. (B) Comparison of %-ox data between control- and EtOH-fed ER samples. Average ratios of EtOH- to control-fed were computed and log10 values plotted vs peptide number for each peptide detected at least 3 times. (C) Histograms (fractional distributions) of peptide %-ox values plotted according to treatment condition. ER peptides from control-fed Xbp1+/- mice (pink) are shifted toward more reducing %-ox compared with WT (grey). Peptides from EtOH-fed WT mice (green) are more oxidized, and those from Xbp1+/- mice (yellow) are even more severely oxidized because the initial shift toward reduced status exposes more sulfhydryls to the oxidizing conditions associated with ethanol feeding. P values were as follows: 1.0 × 10-37Xbp1+/- control vs WT control; 2.3 × 10-62 WT EtOH vs WT control; and 1.1 × 10-6Xbp1+/- EtOH vs WT EtOH. (D) Graphic illustration of the shifts in peptide redox status associated with different conditions. Average fold-changes and P values for individual comparisons are shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Figure 3Quantitative effects of ethanol and (A) Representative detection by anti-biotin Western blot of Cel monomers and dimers and minor bands in ER fractions. (B) Quantitation of individual 70-kilodalton and 140-kilodalton Cel bands. (C) Comparison of Cel dimer/monomer ratio. Bands obtained in 4 experiments as shown in panel A were quantitated by densitometry, and the ratio of the upper band/lower band was calculated and plotted as means ± SEM, n = 3. (D) Densitometric quantitation of relative levels of minor individual gel bands (marked with black bars in panel A) from ER fractions obtained from control- and ethanol-fed mice. (E) Changes in aggregate values of 6 minor serine hydrolase bands assessed in panel D mediated by ethanol-feeding and XBP1 deficiency, calculated and plotted as means ± SEM, n = 3. con, control; L, lower; U, upper.
Figure 5Cel protein is differentially distributed among subcellular fractions and total pancreas tissue from ethanol-fed Pancreas tissue was harvested and fractionated as in Figure 1, from WT or Xbp1+/- mice fed control (con) or ethanol (EtOH) diets for 5–6 weeks. Fractions were obtained by centrifugation at (1) 1500 × g; (2) 10,000 × g; and (3) 85,000 × g. (A) Cel (70 kilodalton) protein was analyzed by Western blot (upper panels), and quantitated in the different fractions (20 μg/lane) in the graph (lower panels) (optical density, means ± SEM, n = 3). A Cel protein fragment of ∼48 kilodaltons also was detected in the fractions. (B) Cel protein expression is enhanced in total pancreas tissue upon EtOH feeding or in the Xbp1+/- mice. Pancreas tissue was harvested from control- or EtOH-fed WT or Xbp1+/- mice, and total proteins extracted with RIPA buffer without further fractionation. Cel protein and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 as a loading control were analyzed by Western blot in tissue extract (40 μg/lane). In the graph, the optical density of Cel bands was quantitated relative to total extracellular signal-regulated kinase protein; data indicate means ± SEM, n = 3. (C) AR42J cells were cultured for 48 hours in control medium (K12 medium supplemented with 12% fetal bovine serum) alone or with 100 mmol/L EtOH. ER membrane fractions were obtained by centrifugation of hypotonically lysed cells at (1) 150 × g; (2) 750 × g; (3) 1300 × g; (4) 5000 × g; (5) 12,000 × g; and (6) 100,000 × g. Cel protein in the fractions (10 mg/lane) was analyzed by Western blot. Arrows indicate the following: (A) Rat Cel, ∼70 kilodaltons; and (B) Cel fragments, ∼40–60 kilodaltons. (D) Ethanol-induced aggregate formation in AR42J cells. Cells were kept untreated or treated with 100 mmol/L EtOH for 48 hours, and then cellular aggresomes were visualized in a confocal microscope using the PROTEOSTAT Aggresome detection kit (ENZ-51035; Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY). Red fluorescence (left panels) indicates aggresomes; corresponding differential interference contrast microscopy images are shown (right panels). ∗, P value less than .05 by student's t test.
Figure 6Cel structure responds to Cys266 disulfide disruption by stabilizing activity and dimers. (A) Monomeric and dimeric 3-dimensional structures of the WT and reduced forms of Cel. The upper pair of structures illustrate that disruption of the disulfide bond, Cys266–Cys277, in Cel is consistent with preservation of catalytic activity because it has little to no effect on the residue spacing within the catalytic triad. The lower pair of structures depict the enhanced interaction at the protomer–protomer interface that result from disrupting the Cys266–Cys277 disulfide bond in Cel, consistent with enhanced formation of a Cel–Cel dimer. (B) His–Asp and Ser–His distance plots in WT and reduced dimer (a) without Ca2+; and (b) with Ca2+.