| Literature DB >> 29930450 |
Dhanashree Ratra1, Durgasri Jaishankar1, Ramya Sachidanandam1, Hatim Yusufali1, Vineet Ratra2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stargardt disease, a juvenile retinal dystrophy, may show secondary changes in the choroid which may have importance while considering future treatments such as stem cell transplant.Entities:
Keywords: Choriocapillaris atrophy; Stargardt disease; macular degeneration; optical coherence tomography; photoreceptor degeneration
Year: 2018 PMID: 29930450 PMCID: PMC5991054 DOI: 10.4103/ojo.OJO_21_2017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oman J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0974-620X
Figure 1(a) Fundus picture of a 16 year old patient diagnosed as Stargardt disease shows beaten metal appearance of macular degeneration. The optic disc and vessels are normal. There are no flecks in this patient. (b) Autofluorescence (fundus autofluorescence) of the same eye reveals absent fundus autofluorescence at the macula. (c) Fluorescein angiography of the same eye shows patchy hyperfluorescence at the macula due to transmission defect secondary to retinal pigment epithelial atrophy
Figure 2Measurement of choroidal thickness in Stargardt group
Figure 3Automated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study choroidal thickness map in control eye
Figure 4Measurement of choroidal thickness in normal group
Mean of average choroidal thickness (μ) at 9 sectors in 3 concentric circles of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid of normal group and Stargardt group
Mean retinal and choroidal layer thickness at 1000 μ from fovea in normal and Stargardt group
Mean thickness (μ) of various layers of retina and choroid at the edge of the lesion, 500 μ inside the lesion, and 500 μ outside the lesion measured from the nasal border of lesion in Stargardt group
Figure 5Change in mean thickness of retinal and choroidal layers in three regions of retina with respect to nasal border of lesion in Stargardt group
Figure 6Linear regression analysis between average diameter of the lesion and visual acuity (in logMAR)
Mean value (μ) of parameters with statistically significant difference between groups of flecks
Figure 7Average diameter of lesion in each group of flecks