Literature DB >> 29930373

Customised fixed appliance systems and treatment duration.

Margarita Papakostopoulou1, Dominic Hurst1.   

Abstract

DesignRandomised controlled trial.InterventionPatients aged 12-30 years requiring fixed orthodontic treatment were eligible and were randomly allocated to treatment with the Insignia customised orthodontic system or the Damon Q noncustomised orthodontic system.Outcome measureThe primary outcome measure was treatment duration. Secondary outcomes were quality of treatment result; the degree of improvement graded using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) score; number of visits from the first visit after bonding to debonding; number of loose brackets; time required for treatment planning; and number of complaints.ResultsOne hundred and eighty patients entered the trial. Four were lost to follow-up and two did not complete treatment, so 174 were analysed. Treatment duration was 1.29 ± 0.35 years in the customised group and 1.24 ± 0.37 years in the noncustomised group. The PAR did not differ significantly between groups. However, the orthodontist had a significant effect on treatment duration, quality of treatment outcome and number of visits (P < 0.05). Compared to the noncustomised group, the customised group had more loose brackets, a longer planning time and more complaints.ConclusionsThe customised orthodontic system was not associated with significantly reduced treatment duration, and treatment quality was comparable between the two systems.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29930373     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Dent        ISSN: 1462-0049


  3 in total

1.  The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity.

Authors:  S Richmond; W C Shaw; K D O'Brien; I B Buchanan; R Jones; C D Stephens; C T Roberts; M Andrews
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Clinical effectiveness and efficiency of customized vs. conventional preadjusted bracket systems.

Authors:  Dennis J Weber; Lorne D Koroluk; Ceib Phillips; Tung Nguyen; William R Proffit
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2013-04

3.  Do customized orthodontic appliances and vibration devices provide more efficient treatment than conventional methods?

Authors:  Abdullah M Aldrees
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 1.372

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Antibacterial properties and abrasion-stability: Development of a novel silver-compound material for orthodontic bracket application.

Authors:  Hannah Denis; Richard Werth; Andreas Greuling; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Meike Stiesch; Viktoria Meyer-Kobbe; Katharina Doll
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.341

Review 2.  Robotic Applications in Orthodontics: Changing the Face of Contemporary Clinical Care.

Authors:  Samar Adel; Abbas Zaher; Nadia El Harouni; Adith Venugopal; Pratik Premjani; Nikhilesh Vaid
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.